A Curious Trim Level for New 2017 Mazda CX-5: Grand Select

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain

Sitting just $500 below the top-spec 2017 Mazda CX-5 Grand Touring is a new Grand Select trim.

Mazda spokesperson Jacob Brown tells CarsDirect, which spotted the addition, that the 2017 CX-5 Grand Select is an attempt by Mazda USA to examine consumer tastes.

Grand Select, Brown says, “will be offered for a limited time and will test the waters for customer options preferences in the marketplace.”

Like the CX-5 Grand Touring, the $29,835 Grand Select is a very well-equipped, premium-aping compact crossover. Unlike the CX-5 Grand Touring, the Grand Select lacks forward collision warning, adaptive cruise, auto high beams, lane departure warning, and lane keeping assist. A few years down the increasingly autonomous road, those are the kinds of features that might be a real boon to resale.

Sure you wanna save $500?

The CX-5 Grand Select sneaks in under the $30K marker but still includes some advanced safety tech: blind spot monitoring and cross-traffic alert, for example. And because the Grand Select is essentially a CX-5 Grand Touring without a few enhanced safety features, there are still 19-inch wheels, leather seating, Bose audio, power driver’s seat, and a sunroof.

Although it’s increasingly normal for auto writers to hop in and out of vehicles with steering wheels that turn by themselves, cars that periodically brake whether you want them to or not, and cruise control that slows behind dawdling traffic, consumers who haven’t driven a new car since they bought their first CX-5 in 2012 can be in for quite a shock.

With the 2017 CX-5 Grand Select, Mazda will be able to determine whether some of the consumers who want luxury content would rather not encounter any form of autonomous driving.

If Mazda is going to perform such a test, the CX-5 is the volume vehicle with which to do so.

Although Mazda’s company-wide volume remains unimpressive in the United States, the CX-5 is on track for its best year ever in 2017, continuing an unending growth streak for what is now the most popular Mazda. The current pace pegs U.S. CX-5 sales at 125,000 units in 2017, a 57-percent jump compared with 2013, the nameplate’s first full year. On a monthly basis, CX-5 sales have grown, year-over-year, in 43 of the last 52 months. 40 percent of the Mazdas sold in the United States in the first five months of 2017 were CX-5s.

As for other CX-5s, the basic 2017 CX-5 Sport starts at $24,985, including a $940 destination fee. The mid-grade Touring is $26,855. The Grand Touring is $30,335. All-wheel drive is a $1,300 option at each level. There are no manual transmissions.

[Image: Mazda]

Timothy Cain is a contributing analyst at The Truth About Cars and Autofocus.ca and the founder and former editor of GoodCarBadCar.net. Follow on Twitter @timcaincars.

Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 18 comments
  • Meat Meat on Jun 17, 2017

    I'm willing to bet that the discounted insurance premiums of the Grand Touring with the full package of aids and safety features will more than make up for the extra $500 over the course of a few years.

    • Stevelovescars Stevelovescars on Jun 18, 2017

      Really? I've never even heard of insurance companies asking if one has those features. Does it cost less to insure a Grand Touring example vs a base Sport? Personally, I'd prefer the nicer interior trim and sunroof without the ride-killing larger wheels and tires.

  • Meat Meat on Jun 18, 2017

    My insurance offers discounts for features like ABS, blind spot monitoring, back up cameras, and I'd presume others like lane holding and automatic braking. I was asked about those at the time of enrollment but I don't have those on my vehicles so I don't see that discount on my bill. At the very least I'd expect insurers to assess risk and resulting premiums not just on make and model but also trim level. One can reasonably hypothesize that buyer's of higher trim levels with more safety tech will make fewer claims. As it is, drivers of cheaper vehicles tend to be involved with more collisions than those driving newer and more expensive vehicles. Regarding the savings - if the average modern car buyer is financing for 60 months the insurance premium savings need only be $8/month to make up that additional expenditure on the higher trim level.

  • Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
  • GregLocock Car companies can only really sell cars that people who are new car buyers will pay a profitable price for. As it turns out fewer and fewer new car buyers want sedans. Large sedans can be nice to drive, certainly, but the number of new car buyers (the only ones that matter in this discussion) are prepared to sacrifice steering and handling for more obvious things like passenger and cargo space, or even some attempt at off roading. We know US new car buyers don't really care about handling because they fell for FWD in large cars.
  • Slavuta Why is everybody sweating? Like sedans? - go buy one. Better - 2. Let CRV/RAV rust on the dealer lot. I have 3 sedans on the driveway. My neighbor - 2. Neighbors on each of our other side - 8 SUVs.
  • Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.
  • Wjtinfwb Not proud of what Stellantis is rolling out?
Next