Mitsubishi Electric Fined Millions for Role in Auto Parts Bid-rigging Conspiracy

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

A major auto industry supplier has found itself on the receiving end of a multi-million-dollar fine north of the border, following an investigation into an international bid-rigging conspiracy.

The Ontario Superior Court of Justice leveled a fine of $13.4 million against Mitsubishi Electric on Tuesday for its role in the illegal agreement. The supplier pleaded guilty to three charges, making it only the most recent Japanese supplier to face expensive justice for landing a juicy — but dodgy — parts contract.

According to Canada’s Competition Bureau — an independent law enforcement body — Mitsubishi Electric joined a group of Japanese auto parts manufacturers in the conspiracy:

A Bureau investigation determined that Mitsubishi Electric entered into illegal agreements with a competing Japanese car parts manufacturer. The companies conspired to determine who would win certain calls for bids issued by Honda and Ford for the supply of alternators, and by General Motors for the supply of ignition coils. The calls for bids occurred between 2003 and 2006.

The Bureau first learned of the scheme in 2009 through its immunity program. That program provides immunity from prosecution to the first whistleblower involved an illegal corporate operation. Since 2013, the Bureau has issued a total of $84 million in fines to members of the conspiracy.

In April of that year, the Bureau fined Yazaki Corporation $30 million. The supplier has pleaded guilty to bid-rigging for its contract for wire harnesses supplied to Honda and Toyota for the 2006 Honda Ridgeline, 2006 Honda Civic and 2006 Toyota Corolla/Matrix models.

One year ago, the investigation saw a $13 million fine leveled against Showa Corporation. The company supplied electric power steering gears for Honda models produced in Canada between 2007 and 2008.

The same investigation has spilled over into the United States, where last year Nishikawa Rubber Company paid a $130 million fine after rigging bids for body sealing products. In that case, Nishikawa gained a contract with Toyota and Honda lasting from 2000 to 2012.

Eight other suppliers involved in scheme have seen fines from the Competition Bureau over the past four years, including Toyo Tire and Panasonic Corporation.

[Image: goodharbor/ Flickr ( CC BY-NC-ND 2.0)]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 12 comments
  • JohnTaurus JohnTaurus on Apr 28, 2017

    Boy, I tell ya, you can't go wrong with buying Japanese.

  • Ryoku75 Ryoku75 on Apr 28, 2017

    Based on some quick research this isn't a new thing with Japanese part makers, Denso, Yazaki, and others have been involved. What I'm curious about is how frequent these events are, and who else partakes.

    • See 2 previous
    • Lou_BC Lou_BC on Apr 28, 2017

      @Sceptic That is very true. Many wars and coups have been orchestrated for the profit of business.

  • JK Savoy Blue is a thing, but Sestriere White? Sestriere is a ski town near Turin, so I guess it meant to conjure up thoughts of snow. Pretty car. I hope Pininfarina has success. The industry in and around Turin has taken a big hit and is a shadow of its former self.
  • Ravenuer My 2023 CRV EX, 6 mo old, 4800 miles: $0.
  • TheEndlessEnigma My '16 FiST: Oil changes, tires, valve cover gasket (at 112k miles), coolant flush, brakes.....and that's itMy '19 Grand Caravan: Oil changes, coolant flush
  • John Clyne I own a 1997 GMC Suburban that I bought second hand. It was never smoked in but had lost the new car smell when I got it four years after it was sold new. I own a 2005 Chevrolet Avalanche & that still has the new car smell. I like the smell. I could never afford a new car until the Avalanche. It might be my last new car? Why do they build cars with fire retardant materials in them. Smoking rates are falling & if someone continues to smoke in this day & age is a fool especially with all the information out there.
  • Theflyersfan Non-performance models, probably the Civic based on the fact the interior feels and looks better in the Honda. Both of them are going to drive like adequate appliances with small engines and CVTs and get decent mileage, so this is based on where my butt will rest and things my hands and fingers will touch.Toyota doesn't have an answer to the Civic Si so the Honda wins by default.CTR vs GR Corolla. One dealer by me is still tacking on $10,000 markups for the CTR and good luck with the GR Corolla and the "allocation" system. There's that one dealer in Missouri that I pasted their ad a while back wanting $125,000 for a mid-level GR. Nope. But cars.com is still showing markups. Both of these cars will have little depreciation for a while, so the markups equal instant loss. It looks like Cincinnati-area dealers are done with CTR markups. So this is a tough choice. I don't like the Corolla interior. It looks and feels inexpensive. I'm glad Honda toned down the exterior but the excessive wing still looks immature for such an expensive car that 20-somethings likely cannot afford. FWD vs AWD. With price being an object, and long-term maintenance a thing, I'd go with the Honda with a side eye at the Golf R as a mature choice. All with stick shifts.
Next