GM Executives Aren't Worried About Buick's Future After Opel Sale

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

General Motors’ sale of Opel to France’s PSA Group sparked much debate on what the European division’s loss would mean for Buick, which holds strong product ties with the German manufacturer.

The new Buick Regal, which bowed today in liftback and wagon bodystyles, shares its architecture with Opel’s new-for-2017 Insignia. At the 2018 model’s Detroit-area launch, GM’s executives downplayed the impact on its Buick division, claiming there’s no disruption in sight for the brand.

According to Car and Driver, GM’s vice president of global Buick and GMC, Duncan Aldred, isn’t concerned. “The sale of Opel will have no impact on the fresh new lineup Buick is building out,” he claimed.

GM stands to gain $2.3 billion from the completed sale of Opel, its UK subsidiary Vauxhall, a smattering of assembly plants across several countries, and its main engineering center. GM Financial’s European operations are also part of the deal.

Besides the Regal, which is built in Rüsselsheim, Germany, Buick draws its Cascada convertible directly from the Opel lineup. The Encore, badged as an Opel Mokka in Europe, comes to the U.S. by way of GM Korea, while the Envision sails from a factory in China (where the model first debuted). The LaCrosse sedan and full-size Enclave crossover, of course, are U.S.-built.

The sale comes at a significant time in the life of the Regal, but Mark Reuss, GM’s executive vice president of global product development, purchasing, and supply, said the model isn’t threatened by the sale. (Market direction is another matter.)

“This is very much part of our portfolio plan,” said Mark Reuss. “As we said, Opel and the engineering/production piece of this is very much intact for all of our global platforms. So, you know, no impact.”

While the deal isn’t complete, Reuss claimed that all product-related issues would be solved by the time GM officially hands off its operations to Opel. That would keep Opel-based Buicks flowing to U.S. dealers for the models’ current generation, at least. He wouldn’t say whether GM would pay PSA for development work in the future.

Buick has said in the past that utility vehicles — much like with other automakers — are a big part of its focus. It’s easy to see the Cascada being dropped at the end of this generation, leaving the Regal as the only major question mark. Still, the two automakers aren’t parting completely.

In a continent rapidly adopting new laws limiting the use of gasoline and diesel-powered vehicles, PSA needs electric vehicle technology. It had its eye on Chevrolet’s Bolt, sold in Europe as the Opel Ampera-e. Part of the deal between the two companies includes a collaboration on electrification projects designed to give both companies an edge in the expanding segment.

[Image: Opel]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 23 comments
  • Asdf Asdf on Apr 06, 2017

    Buick is synonymous with China already now, so no doubt it'll become GM's "Crap Made In China" brand for the next generation of vehicles, even in the US - that is, if anyone outside of China still cares about Buick at that point at all...

  • Armadamaster Armadamaster on Apr 07, 2017

    How Buick survived bankruptcy is still mindboggling to me. And it still looks like a Saturn, except now they look like ten year old Saturns.

  • Zerofoo As much as I want "free" markets - they no longer exist.China has declared an economic war on the west. They will prop up their own industries with our money and undermine western industries as a strategy to soften up their economic rivals.We allow them to do this at our own peril.I don't like the idea of protecting inefficient industries, but I like losing those industries entirely to foreign nations even less.
  • Zerofoo A person that can be enticed to become a cop by a flashy car should probably not be a cop.
  • FreedMike I like this car's tech, but I just can't get past the styling here.
  • 3-On-The-Tree Tassos, I’m have several different responses yeti your question.[list=1][*] I didn’t buy the corvette for the sole purpose of highway travail, I got it because my dad had a 57 Corvette with 2 four barrel carbs and. 283 V8. I wanted a corvette and a friend who has a custom car performance shop said to get the newest one you could afford.[/*][*]. Letting a car sit is the worst thing for it so it was my daily driver when I was still in the army 30 miles to the base round trip, 160 miles to Tucson form my doctors appointments and VA stuff. My POS 2014 F150 was constantly in the shop for both turbos, two rear main seals, timing chain, transmission. So I was in the process of selling that.[/*][*]But the most important point is that everyone has an opinion and it doesn’t matter what car a person buys or what they use it for.[/*][/list=1]
  • EBFlex About time the corpse does something right.I wonder where he got the idea....
Next