Company That Developed Exploding Batteries for Phones Reveals Powerful New Energy Cell for Electric Cars

by Matt Posky

Published: January 12th, 2017

company that developed exploding batteries for phones reveals powerful new energy

Earlier this week, Samsung’s SDI battery subsidiary announced a new cell designed for use in electric vehicles that will supposedly improve maximum range and possess a cutting-edge quick charge capacity.

Exhibited for the first time at the North American International Auto Show, the battery comes hot on the heels of Tesla and Panasonic’s own ultra-dense “2170 Cell” planned for use on the Model 3.

While Samsung didn’t elaborate on a specific testing platform, it claims the new battery should permit a range of 372 miles on a single charge, with an 80 percent restoration after a 20 minutes quick charge.

Korea’s tech giant also showcased an “integrated battery module” concept that, interestingly enough, makes use of the same cylindrical 21mm by 70mm format used by Tesla. This unverified tech is claimed to yield a 10-percent decrease in the number of units required, saving weight and offering better overall efficiency.

While Tesla makes its power cells in-house, Samsung plans to sell its new technology to “U.S. automobile startups,” meaning Lucid Motors and Faraday Future.

Still, the partially conceptual nature of the power application and the far-off mass production date of 2021 brings up a lot of questions regarding how convenient electric cars will be throughout this next generation.

Car companies have only recently started promising the swift normalization of electric vehicles on a global scale. In this year’s KPMG Global Automotive Executive Survey, 90 percent of car industry executives surveyed in the United Kingdom expected battery electric vehicles to dominate the automotive marketplace by 2025. With this battery technology potentially not rolling out until 2021, is it realistic to assume BEVs will be the new norm within the next decade? Doubtful.

However, assuming Samsung delivers, a shorter charging time and nearly 400 mile range could make battery-powered vehicles as convenient as their ICE counterparts. And, considering that you can plug your EV in at home, the biggest advantages of all-electric ownership are no longer mired by limited range and lengthy recharge times.

#Batteries #BatteryTechnology #Detroit #ElectricVehicles #NAIAS #NorthAmericanInternationalAutoShow #PowerCells #Samsung

Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 33 comments

APaGttH on Jan 12, 2017

I know you guys are run with no budget (shame on you Verticalscope, TTAC deserves more $$$) but you couldn't find a public domain picture of a Panasonic lithium-ion cell, or other Li battery, so you choose a lead acid car battery picture for this story. Our 140 character or less society doesn't read anymore and now thinks their regular lead-acid car battery is a time bomb from Samsung. I saw it on TTAC...

Like Reply
SCE to AUX on Jan 12, 2017

I haven't checked to see if this 372 mile claim is for the European cycle, or the EPA cycle. If it's for the European cycle, then the EPA equivalent would be about 257 miles. This battery might be around 100 kWh, which means it is charging at about 2X the rate of a Tesla Supercharger (120-150 kW), meaning 240 kW. This is somewhat lower than the proposed next-gen EV chargers, which are supposed to be 350 kW or maybe 500-600 kW. https://www.engadget.com/2016/12/26/tesla-supercharger-v3-teaser/

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Bd2 Lexus is just a higher trim package Toyota. ^^
Tassos ONLY consider CIvics or Corollas, in their segment. NO DAMNED Hyundais, Kias, Nissans or esp Mitsus. Not even a Pretend-BMW Mazda. They may look cute but they SUCK.I always recommend Corollas to friends of mine who are not auto enthusiasts, even tho I never owed one, and owned a Civic Hatch 5 speed 1992 for 25 years. MANY follow my advice and are VERY happy. ALmost all are women.friends who believe they are auto enthusiasts would not listen to me anyway, and would never buy a Toyota. They are damned fools, on both counts.
Tassos since Oct 2016 I drive a 2007 E320 Bluetec and since April 2017 also a 2008 E320 Bluetec.Now I am in my summer palace deep in the Eurozone until end October and drive the 2008.Changing the considerable oils (10 quarts synthetic) twice cost me 80 and 70 euros. Same changes in the US on the 2007 cost me $219 at the dealers and $120 at Firestone.Changing the air filter cost 30 Euros, with labor, and there are two such filters (engine and cabin), and changing the fuel filter only 50 euros, while in the US they asked for... $400. You can safely bet I declined and told them what to do with their gold-plated filter. And when I changed it in Europe, I looked at the old one and it was clean as a whistle.A set of Continentals tires, installed etc, 300 EurosI can't remember anything else for the 2008. For the 2007, a brand new set of manual rec'd tires at Discount Tire with free rotations for life used up the $500 allowance the dealer gave me when I bought it (tires only had 5000 miles left on them then)So, as you can see, I spent less than even if I owned a Lexus instead, and probably less than all these poor devils here that brag about their alleged low cost Datsun-Mitsus and Hyundai-Kias.And that's THETRUTHABOUTCARS. My Cars,
NJRide These are the Q1 Luxury division salesAudi 44,226Acura 30,373BMW 84,475Genesis 14,777Mercedes 66,000Lexus 78,471Infiniti 13,904Volvo 30,000*Tesla (maybe not luxury but relevant): 125,000?Lincoln 24,894Cadillac 35,451So Cadillac is now stuck as a second-tier player with names like Volvo. Even German 3rd wheel Audi is outselling them. Where to gain sales?Surprisingly a decline of Tesla could boost Cadillac EVs. Tesla sort of is now in the old Buick-Mercury upper middle of the market. If lets say the market stays the same, but another 15-20% leave Tesla I could see some going for a Caddy EV or hybrid, but is the division ready to meet them?In terms of the mainstream luxury brands, Lexus is probably a better benchmark than BMW. Lexus is basically doing a modern interpretation of what Cadillac/upscale Olds/Buick used to completely dominate. But Lexus' only downfall is the lack of emotion, something Cadillac at least used to be good at. The Escalade still has far more styling and brand ID than most of Lexus. So match Lexus' quality but out-do them on comfort and styling. Yes a lot of Lexus buyers may be Toyota or import loyal but there are a lot who are former GM buyers who would "come home" for a better product.In fact, that by and large is the Big 3's problem. In the 80s and 90s they would try to win back "import intenders" and this at least slowed the market share erosion. I feel like around 2000 they gave this up and resorted to a ton of gimmicks before the bankruptcies. So they have dropped from 66% to 37% of the market in a quarter century. Sure they have scaled down their presence and for the last 14 years preserved profit. But in the largest, most prosperous market in the world they are not leading. I mean who would think the Koreans could take almost 10% of the market? But they did because they built and structured products people wanted. (I also think the excess reliance on overseas assembly by the Big 3 hurts them vs more import brands building in US). But the domestics should really be at 60% of their home market and the fact that they are not speaks volumes. Cadillac should not be losing 2-1 to Lexus and BMW.
Tassos Not my favorite Eldorados. Too much cowbell (fins), the gauges look poor for such an expensive car, the interior has too many shiny bits but does not scream "flagship luxury", and the white on red leather or whatever is rather loud for this car, while it might work in a Corvette. But do not despair, a couple more years and the exterior designs (at least) will sober up, the cowbells will be more discreet and the long, low and wide 60s designs are not far away. If only the interiors would be fit for the price point, and especially a few acres of real wood that also looked real.