U.S. Department of Transportation Proposes Mandatory 'Talking Car' Technology to Prevent Crashes

by Matt Posky

Published: December 13th, 2016

u s department of transportation proposes mandatory talking car technology to

The United States Department of Transportation has proposed a rule that would require vehicle-to-vehicle communication technology in all new cars.

Vehicle-to-vehicle systems allow cars to communicate information to each other that could be used to update drivers about potential accidents, possibly reducing the number of crashes on U.S. roadways. The basic technology uses short-range radios to send and receive vehicle data on location, speed, direction, and braking status. While extremely useful in the application of autonomous driving technology, a lot of the potential safety applications resulting from V2V has not yet been conceived.

“Advanced vehicle technologies may well prove to be the silver bullet in saving lives on our roadways,” NHTSA Administrator Mark Rosekind said in an official announcement. “V2V and automated vehicle technologies each hold great potential to make our roads safer, and when combined, their potential is untold.”

Early applications of the proposed system would revolve around currently available safety aids. Vehicles that contain automated driving functions — automatic braking or adaptive cruise control, for example — could further benefit from the use of V2V data.

The system could also provide drivers with enhanced abilities and complete situational awareness. For example, a driver could receive additional information to help them decide if it is safe to pass on a two-lane road, make a left turn across the path of oncoming traffic, or determine if a vehicle approaching an intersection appears to be on a collision course.

Of course, with the exchange of data comes the question of digital security. However, the proposal has considered personal privacy. The DOT says that no personal information about the driver or vehicle will be broadcast using V2V; the system only transmits generic safety information. Meanwhile the NHTSA is also working to ensure that the system is safe from digital attacks.

While the “rule” is only a proposal at the moment, the DOT has officially stated that it intends to make the technology a requirement on new light-vehicles. The notice of proposed rulemaking will be open for public comment for 90 days. Then, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration will review and alter the proposal before issuing a final ruling.

[Image: State Farm]

#DepartmentOfTransportation #NHTSA #Safety #Technology #V2V

Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments

Join the conversation

5 of 47 comments

Dantes_inferno on Dec 14, 2016

>The system could also provide drivers with enhanced abilities and complete situational awareness. Providing the dumbed-down driving populace with situational awareness abilities sounds like the ultimate oxymoron.

Like Reply
Tandoor on Dec 14, 2016

While we're at it can we please incorporate a way for my car to tell the car in front of it that the light is now green and please get a move on.

Like Reply
- See 2 previous
- Tandoor on Dec 14, 2016
  
  I know, the horn. Always feels kind of rude, though.
  
  Like
- GS 455 on Dec 14, 2016
  
  @Tandoor What we really need are car horns with two settings or levels including one that has a pleasant and polite tone that tells the other driver to get going without provoking the middle finger.
  
  Like
- Shaker on Dec 14, 2016
  
  @GS 455 "...provoking the middle finger." Or, the trigger finger... My Volt has a button on the end of the turn-signal stalk that makes the horn emit a one-second "warble" as a manual warning for pedestrians - even that is a little too loud if you're close - but it's good for "prodding" inattentive drivers.
  
  Like

Recent Comments

KOKing Kinda hate to say this but they need to be an American Land Rover sans the offroad image (and capability). Leave the Escalade alone and do a shrunken Escalade-esque lineup (the first time I saw a Hyundai Palisade I thought that was the XT6 that Cadillac shoulda made) and dump the alphabet soup models and trims.
Theflyersfan How to fix Cadillac? Blackwing.Now I know (because I've asked) dealers are still thinking they are selling Demons with the kinds of markups on Blackwings, but for enthusiast drivers in the know, those cars are legit. They get lost in the shuffle of M-this and AMG-that, but they hold their own. However, with rising CAFE standards and upcoming emissions requirements, along with European CO2 limits, they all can't be turbo V8s with no hybrid propulsion. So at least mild hybrid them to try to eke out another 8-10 mpg average. That's a good start. Do something with the Escalade. These aren't the early 2000s when they had the hip hop image and every corner had a jet black Escalade with chrome rims. In my area, you just don't see them any longer as money has moved to the Germans. If they want to compete with the Germans, they have to downsize it and crank the engine up to 11. It's still way too truckish to compete with the Q8, X7, and GLS. Even though they probably don't want to, keep the sedans. Don't give those up to the Germans, Japanese, and Koreans as well. And with all that, go all in with performance. Become what BMW was over 15 years ago. They tried that before and half assed it, but they have the tools to make it happen now. Try to appeal to the audience that BMW and Mercedes left behind and that Genesis and Acura are trying to claim (or reclaim). Good luck Cadillac...you'll need it.
SCE to AUX Introduce a modern V-16 and put it into a Celestiq-like vehicle instead of electric.
DungBeetle62 For where we're at in the product cycle, I think there are bigger changes afoot. With this generation debuting in 2018, and the Avalon gone, is the next ES to be Crown based? That'll be an interesting aesthetic leap.
Philip Precht When Cadillac stopped building luxury cars, with luxury looks, that is when they started their downward spiral. Now, they just look like Chevrolet knock-offs, not much luxury, no luxurious looks. Interiors are just generic. Nothing what they used to look like. Why should someone spend $80,000 on a Cadillac when they can spend a LOT less and get a comparable looking Chevrolet????