My $1.8 Million Fleet in 2016 - the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
Over the last year, the PR departments of 12 automobile manufacturers delivered 38 new vehicles to my driveway. Scheduling quirks and limited autumn availability saw that number slide from 2015, but week-long exposure to new vehicles was nevertheless extensive in 2016.
It’s a good gig. Sure, we work hard to maintain GoodCarBadCar.net — Mrs. Cain has even put in a fair number of hours since the October birth of our second baby boy — while I also contribute a couple of times per week to Autofocus.ca and work daily for The Truth About Cars. But in addition to our favored steed — the 2015 Honda Odyssey EX that we pay for with our own money — I get to drive (and fuel, and clean, and write two reviews about) a new automobile every week.
Those automobiles were collectively valued at $1.8 million in 2016, down from $2.2 million in 2015. The average price of the vehicles sent to GCBC Towers rose 4 percent to $46,671.
Every now and then, though less often than you’d think, I’d prefer a vehicle to hang around for an extra week. At least as often, I’d be content for vehicles to leave before their week was up. With the year now coming to a close, here are the best, the worst, the most surprising, the most disappointing, the most efficient, and the least economical vehicles I tested over the last year.
In 2016, Canada’s Maritime press fleet included one pickup truck, one roadster, two vans, seven sedans, three coupes, two wagons, eight hatchbacks, and 14 utility vehicles.
There were five hybrids, including a plug-in, and only four cars with manual transmissions. There was only one V8 engine; only seven V6s. 20 of the 38 powerplants were turbocharged.
Vehicles are hand-delivered to our driveway, but we don’t have any say in the selection or specification. It doesn’t work that way on Nova Scotia’s far flung east coast.
Best Of The Best: Mazda MX-5 Miata
It may be a painfully obvious choice, but the fourth-generation Mazda MX-5 Miata was by far the most fun I had all year. I’m in this business, rather than the business of measuring the linear feet of category space given to potato chips in grocery stores, because I enjoy driving. Over the last year, I drove vehicles with profoundly higher price tags than the MX-5’s. There was no shortage of cars with more power, more space, and more features.
But the Miata is better.
Honorable mentions: Volkswagen Golf R, Mercedes-Benz GLC300 4Matic, Audi A4
Biggest Surprise: Ford F-150 EcoBoost 2.7
Honorable mentions: Chevrolet Spark LS, Chevrolet Malibu 1.5T
Worst Of The Worst: Fiat 500X Trekking AWD
Honorable mentions: Honda HR-V EX-L and Audi Q3
Biggest Disappointment: Hyundai Veloster Turbo DCT
Honorable Mentions: Audi A3 e-Tron and Infiniti QX50
Most Efficient: Toyota Prius, 57 mpg
Ford C-Max SE (46 mpg) and Lincoln MKZ Hybrid Reserve (39 mpg)
Least Efficient: Acura MDX, 16 mpg
Honorable Mentions: GMC Yukon Denali (17 mpg) and Mercedes-Benz GLC300 4Matic (18 mpg)
THE CARS
Timothy Cain is the founder of GoodCarBadCar.net, which obsesses over the free and frequent publication of U.S. and Canadian auto sales figures. Follow on Twitter @goodcarbadcar and on Facebook.
More by Timothy Cain
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Bd2 Would be sweet on a Telluride.
- Luke42 When will they release a Gladiator 4xe?I don’t care what color it is, but I do care about being able to plug it in.
- Bd2 As I have posited here numerous times; the Hyundai Pony Coupe of 1974 was the most influential sports and, later on, supercar template. This Toyota is a prime example of Hyundai's primal influence upon the design industry. Just look at the years, 1976 > 1974, so the numbers bear Hyundai out and this Toyota is the copy.
- MaintenanceCosts Two of my four cars currently have tires that have remaining tread life but 2017 date codes. Time for a tire-stravaganza pretty soon.
- Lorenzo I'd actually buy another Ford, if they'd bring back the butternut-squash color. Well, they actually called it sea foam green, but some cars had more green than others, and my 1968 Mercury Montego MX was one of the more-yellow, less-green models. The police always wrote 'yellow' on the ticket.
Comments
Join the conversation
"Is the 3.5 EcoBoost even necessary?" You'd have to ask Ford engineers that question since the EB3.5 is their designated "go to" motor for any heavy lifting. It would be much more appropriate to ask, "Is the 3.5L Ti-VCT V6 or 5.0L Ti-VCT V8 even necessary?" The 5.0 (soon to be 4.8 V8) is necessary to keep the obnoxious driver and the aftermarket exhaust industry alive. LOL. The NA 3.5 is for the fleet industry. I doubt the 2.7 Turbo would fair well under the abuse of "I don't give a sh!t" fleet drivers and haphazard maintenance.
The general consensus appears to be that the MX5 is a super great car yet it's the only Mazda without The Schnoz. Significant?