Subaru Viziv-7 Concept Revealed: Subaru's New Three-Row Flagship Is Huge

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain

Subaru has perched a three-row crossover atop its lineup before.

It didn’t work. (And not just because of some things TTAC may or may not have said about the general appearance of the B9 Tribeca.)

Set to be revealed today at the 2016 Los Angeles Auto Show, the Subaru Viziv-7 Concept previews the arrival of a genuinely large Subaru family crossover. Don’t expect the Viziv name to carry forward – that’s merely how Subaru tags its concepts. Do expect a production version loosely based on the design of the Viziv-7 Concept in the early stages of 2018.With a wheelbase stretching 117.7 inches and a bumper-to-bumper length of 204.7 inches, the Viziv-7 Concept’s wheelbase is a third-row-favoring 9.5 inches longer than the departed Tribeca’s. The whole vehicle is 13.2 inches longer than the Tribeca — a rare but indisputable flop for Subaru.

Nearly a decade of production produced only 76,774 Tribeca sales in the United States, or roughly the number of Ford Explorers sold every four months.

But the B9 Tribeca wasn’t just ugly — in fact, the Tribeca was rather innocuous after a MY2008 facelift. Cramped inside, overpriced, somewhat ponderous to drive — Subaru’s first three-row vehicle was undesirable for a number of reasons.

The Tribeca was also the three-row family crossover effort from a brand that owned just 1.2 percent of the market.

The production version of the LA auto show’s Viziv-7 Concept will fight on behalf of a Subaru brand that’s seen its market share triple since the B9 Tribeca hit the market. And if the concept’s dimensions are anything to go by, it shouldn’t be too cramped.

At 204.7 inches long, the Viziv-7 stretches two feet farther than the Forester, Subaru’s best-selling model. The concept is 15 inches longer than the Subaru Outback, Subaru’s biggest current model. The Viziv-7 is even longer than the Chevrolet Traverse and Dodge Durango, both big players in the three-row crossover segment.

We have more faith in the Viziv-7 Concept’s dimensions carrying forward to production than its styling. Historically, Subaru concepts have not accurately predicted production cars, even when the Viziv tag isn’t used. The Impreza Concept from last year’s Tokyo auto show (and then the Impreza Sedan Concept from last year’s LA auto show) is recognizable as an Imprezaesque car, but it’s wildly better looking than the humble production car. Subaru’s three-year-old Legacy Concept has themes that carried forward to the production Legacy sedan, but it’s in a whole different league.

So, this isn’t merely a matter of toning down the wheels and headlights. A production Subaru three-row crossover might not resemble this Viziv-7 in any meaningful way.

But for the growing legions of Subaru loyalists who need something bigger — a lot bigger — something good this way comes. Expect the production U.S.-built Subaru flagship to be called the Ascent.

[Images: Subaru via NASIOC Forum]

Timothy Cain is the founder of GoodCarBadCar.net, which obsesses over the free and frequent publication of U.S. and Canadian auto sales figures. Follow on Twitter @goodcarbadcar and on Facebook.

Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 41 comments
  • Slance66 Slance66 on Nov 18, 2016

    Am I the only one that see a giant Forester here from the looks department?

  • Kosmo Kosmo on Nov 18, 2016

    It's got to be giant, since I'm pretty sure the current Outback has grown to within a couple of inches of the old Tribecca.

  • Scrotie about 4 years ago there was a 1992 oldsmobile toronado which was a travtech-avis pilot car that had the prototype nav system and had a big antenna on the back. it sold quick and id never seen another ever again. i think they wanted like 13500 for it which was steep for an early 90s gm car.
  • SunnyGL I helped my friend buy one of these when they came in 2013 (I think). We tried a BMW 535xi, an Audi A6 and then this. He was very swayed by the GS350 and it helped a lot that Lexus knocked about $8k off the MSRP. I guess they wanted to get some out there. He has about 90k on it now and it's been very reliable, but some chump rear-ended it hard when it was only a few years old.From memory, liked the way the Bimmer drove and couldn't fathom why everyone thought Audi interiors were so great at that time - the tester we had was a sea of black.The GS350's mpg is impressive, much better than the '05 G35x I had which could only get about 24mpg highway.
  • Theflyersfan Keep the car. It's reliable, hasn't nickeled and dimed you to death, and it looks like you're a homeowner so something with a back seat and a trunk is really helpful! As I've discovered becoming a homeowner with a car with no back seat and a trunk the size of a large cooler, even simple Target or Ikea runs get complicated if you don't ride up with a friend with a larger car. And I wonder if the old VW has now been left in Price Hill with the keys in the ignition and a "Please take me" sign taped to the windshield? The problems it had weren't going to improve with time.
  • SPPPP I don't think it's a sign of pressure from external competition, but rather a healthy sign of letting practicality trump triumphalism on the assembly floor. Does a 1-piece casting make sense? Imagine the huge investment (no pun intended) in the tooling for that structure. Now imagine that a change in regulation or market conditions requires a change to the structure. You're going to build all the tooling all over again? Why not use "gigacasting" selectively, to build right-sized modules that can be assembled simply and repeatably? Changing 1/3 of the tooling is much less costly. Additionally, it makes the vehicles repairable, instead of being subject to total loss in a minor accident.
  • Formula m Oh my first Ford learning experience was with a sales manager who is a former stripclub manager with a Satan’s choice tattoo on his forearm… was very eye opening. You can imagine how he has contributed to Ottawa over his long tenure with Ford. Hopefully A.I. gives a different experience
Next