The Chevrolet Cruze Diesel's Mileage Potential Is All in the Gearing

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

There’s plenty of speculation that General Motors wants to launch the next-generation Chevrolet Cruze Diesel with a highly marketable 50 mile-per-gallon highway fuel economy figure.

“Hybrids are for wimps! Volkswagen just didn’t like you!” the automaker could claim. GM, of course, hasn’t exactly been silent on its grand plan to lure jilted TDI owners to the brand.

Now that specifications have been released for the upcoming oil burner, we can see that a “new” transmission added to the Cruze lineup will play a big role in chasing that mileage crown.

According to the newly released 2017 GM order guide and powertrain guide posted in the GMInsideNews Forum, the manual transmission variant is the one to provide that lofty highway figure.

Chevy will use its MZ4 six-speed manual transmission in the Cruze Diesel — an M32 variant that hasn’t been seen in the Cruze lineup, but came standard in Chevy Sonics equipped with the 1.4-liter turbo four-cylinder. The unit boasts a 0.61 top gear, the tallest in GM’s front-wheel-drive stable.

The MZ4’s upper gear ratios also appeared in the former Cruze Eco, which marketed a “triple overdrive” transmission capable of returning 42 mpg on the highway. As an owner, this writer can attest to that vehicle’s ridiculously tall gearing. (In top gear, the sedan picks up speed on barely perceptible inclines with your foot off the accelerator.)

In contrast, the Cruze Diesel’s 9T50 nine-speed automatic boasts a 0.62 top gear, but a lower final drive ratio. Expect a better combined MPG figure from this setup.

Unlike the previous Cruze Diesel, offered only in high-end trim with an automatic, the new model debuts in midrange “LT” trim, with few options available for the stick shift variant. GM has made it clear that it wants to cover a number of bases formerly covered by Volkswagen, so greater diversity is on the way. That includes an RS sport version.

Sourced from a plant in Hungary, the 1.6-liter turbodiesel — GM dubs it the “Whisper Diesel” — makes 137 horsepower and 240 lb-ft of torque. The mill also appears in the downsized 2018 Chevrolet Equinox. Available as a sedan or hatchback, the Cruze Diesel is due to appear next year as a 2018 model.

[Image: General Motors]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 39 comments
  • Rokop Rokop on Nov 07, 2016

    Maybe I could get a Cruze hatchback diesel with 6 speed manual....in brown.

    • See 1 previous
    • HotPotato HotPotato on Nov 07, 2016

      @brettc Pepperdust Metallic, aka iridescent beige/gray, is a seriously classy, expensive-looking color. And it darn well oughtta be, since you can option your spiffy new Cruze hatch north of 30 grand no sweat... But I too would prefer poo brown. For those who want a brown wagon, Ford offered a Kodiak Brown when they released the 2013 Escape (not sure if they still do). It looks black until sunlight hits it, and then it's got a shimmery root beer thing going on. Really slick.

  • Tinn-Can Tinn-Can on Nov 07, 2016

    At what speed? It seems like they do the gearing to game the EPA test cycle and once you get out on the 75mph real world highway MPGs fall off a cliff...

  • Mike-NB2 This is a mostly uninformed vote, but I'll go with the Mazda 3 too.I haven't driven a new Civic, so I can't say anything about it, but two weeks ago I had a 2023 Corolla as a rental. While I can understand why so many people buy these, I was surprised at how bad the CVT is. Many rentals I've driven have a CVT and while I know it has one and can tell, they aren't usually too bad. I'd never own a car with a CVT, but I can live with one as a rental. But the Corolla's CVT was terrible. It was like it screamed "CVT!" the whole time. On the highway with cruise control on, I could feel it adjusting to track the set speed. Passing on the highway (two-lane) was risky. The engine isn't under-powered, but the CVT makes it seem that way.A minor complaint is about the steering. It's waaaay over-assisted. At low speeds, it's like a 70s LTD with one-finger effort. Maybe that's deliberate though, given the Corolla's demographic.
  • Mike-NB2 2019 Ranger - 30,000 miles / 50,000 km. Nothing but oil changes. Original tires are being replaced a week from Wednesday. (Not all that mileage is on the original A/S tires. I put dedicated winter rims/tires on it every winter.)2024 - Golf R - 1700 miles / 2800 km. Not really broken in yet. Nothing but gas in the tank.
  • SaulTigh I've got a 2014 F150 with 87K on the clock and have spent exactly $4,180.77 in maintenance and repairs in that time. That's pretty hard to beat.Hard to say on my 2019 Mercedes, because I prepaid for three years of service (B,A,B) and am getting the last of those at the end of the month. Did just drop $1,700 on new Michelins for it at Tire Rack. Tires for the F150 late last year were under $700, so I'd say the Benz is roughly 2 to 3 times as pricy for anything over the Ford.I have the F150 serviced at a large independent shop, the Benz at the dealership.
  • Bike Rather have a union negotiating my pay rises with inflation at the moment.
  • Bike Poor Redapple won't be sitting down for a while after opening that can of Whiparse
Next