Plants, Parts and Pay on the Table as Fiat Chrysler Tries to Avert Midnight Strike

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Fiat Chrysler Automobiles must make some pricey commitments to head off a midnight strike by its Canadian autoworkers.

Bargaining teams from FCA and Unifor, which represents Detroit Three autoworkers in Canada, worked throughout the weekend to nail down a contract deal patterned on the recent General Motors agreement.

Without product commitment for its Brampton assembly plant and Etobicoke casting plant, among other sticking points, workers could walk off the job tonight.

As per tradition, FCA’s product timeline is set in Jello, not stone. Recent product delays have the Unifor team demanding a clearer future for its Windsor assembly plant, which produces the Dodge Grand Caravan and Chrysler Pacifica, as well as the Brampton plant, which makes FCA’s rear-drive cars.

According to the Windsor Star, workers are “cautiously optimistic” they can avoid strike duty.

“We have a lot of new workers and this is the first time they’ve ever been in this position,” said Frank Mosey, strike coordinator for Unifor Local 444. He added, “If the deal includes jobs and investment, there’s a good chance our members will ratify.”

The 1,200 new workers in Windsor heap costs if the deal is modeled on GM’s agreement, which includes pay increases for new hires (while keeping the 10-year pay grid), an overall pay bump for traditional employees, boosted signing bonuses and lump sum payments.

On the product front, Unifor wants something to fill the void left in Etobicoke by the canceled Chrysler 200 and Dodge Dart. The facility manufactures aluminum die castings, pistons, and various engine and transmission parts.

Brampton needs a new paint shop, as well as assurances for its future. The Dodge Challenger and Charger move to a new Alfa Romeo-sourced platform in 2018, while the Chrysler 300’s future remains hazy. FCA’s product pipeline calls for a potential 300 redesign in 2020.

Windsor has less to worry about. A full-size, Pacifica-based Chrysler crossover starts production in 2018, while the Grand Caravan should stay alive until the 2019 model year.

Meanwhile, FCA could stand to gain government cash in return for plant upgrades. A source close to the negotiations told the Star that officials from the automaker met with Ontario Economic Development Minister Brad Duguid and Environment Minister Glen Murray last week to discuss “a possible investment.”

Unifor saw its negotiations with GM sweetened by provincial and federal automotive funding programs, which could see the automaker recoup up to 40 percent of the $554 million (CAD) deal.

[Image: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 10 comments
  • Mikey Mikey on Oct 10, 2016

    12:01 AM .. Is Tuesday morning. I don't know if FCA Canada has an identical agreement to GM Canada. Thanksgiving Day {today} is a statutory holiday. The Friday before Thanksgiving , is a negotiated paid holiday. At GM you were required to be at work the day before , and the day after, to qualify for the Friday. Unauthorized absence could cost you 2 days pay ? I find it odd that UNIFOR would pick Oct 10. Of course ,it could be a done deal, and will settle around 11:45 PM : )

    • See 1 previous
    • JohnTaurus JohnTaurus on Oct 11, 2016

      @Lorenzo Mikey has a special way of looking , at things.

  • Mikey Mikey on Oct 11, 2016

    Tentative agreement reached , 11:56 PM , Who knew ? : ) They're will be lots of gnashing of teeth, and rhetoric , before ratification . It will ratify. Moving on to Ford ? The GM ,and now FCA agreement, will be a hard sell amongst the rank and file. For the past 8 years Ford workers have been told "we didn't need to be bailed out , like the other two did"..."We turned a profit, while the other two sucked on the government teat". i believe Ford Canada will settle , but ratification will be tight .

  • Slavuta CX5 hands down. Only trunk space, where RAV4 is better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Oof 😣 for Tesla.https://www.naturalnews.com/2024-05-03-nhtsa-probes-tesla-recall-over-autopilot-concerns.html
  • Slavuta Autonomous cars can be used by terrorists.
  • W Conrad I'm not afraid of them, but they aren't needed for everyone or everywhere. Long haul and highway driving sure, but in the city, nope.
  • Jalop1991 In a manner similar to PHEV being the correct answer, I declare RPVs to be the correct answer here.We're doing it with certain aircraft; why not with cars on the ground, using hardware and tools like Telsa's "FSD" or GM's "SuperCruise" as the base?Take the local Uber driver out of the car, and put him in a professional centralized environment from where he drives me around. The system and the individual car can have awareness as well as gates, but he's responsible for the driving.Put the tech into my car, and let me buy it as needed. I need someone else to drive me home; hit the button and voila, I've hired a driver for the moment. I don't want to drive 11 hours to my vacation spot; hire the remote pilot for that. When I get there, I have my car and he's still at his normal location, piloting cars for other people.The system would allow for driver rest period, like what's required for truckers, so I might end up with multiple people driving me to the coast. I don't care. And they don't have to be physically with me, therefore they can be way cheaper.Charge taxi-type per-mile rates. For long drives, offer per-trip rates. Offer subscriptions, including miles/hours. Whatever.(And for grins, dress the remote pilots all as Johnnie.)Start this out with big rigs. Take the trucker away from the long haul driving, and let him be there for emergencies and the short haul parts of the trip.And in a manner similar to PHEVs being discredited, I fully expect to be razzed for this brilliant idea (not unlike how Alan Kay wasn't recognized until many many years later for his Dynabook vision).
Next