Chevrolet Keeps a Tepid American Tradition Alive for 2017

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

The sport package, long associated with entry-level vehicles boasting questionable rear spoilers and not much else, remains a puzzling fixture in the automotive landscape.

For low-end imports — rebadged or otherwise — this package historically meant a swoopy graphic plastered along the bodyside, supposedly meant to alert bystanders to the vehicle’s blistering, paint-peeling speed. For others, it simply meant nicer wheels and a spoiler. Ideally a large one, so those same bystanders could ponder the downforce needed to keep a midsize, front-wheel-drive sedan’s tail planted. Rarely was there an addition of a single extra horsepower, and most lucid people knew this.

Chevrolet is keeping this tradition alive, resurrecting the sport package for its 2017 Malibu. However, while the current generation Malibu bowed to positive press, several changes coming for 2017 contain hidden downsides.

For starters, Chevrolet will ditch the 1LT and 2LT trim lines, replacing both with a simple, midrange LT model. That means the turbocharged 2.0-liter four, which makes 250 horsepower and 258 pounds-feet of torque, can only be had in uplevel Premier trim. That model ditches its eight-speed automatic in favor of a nine-speed unit, promising an extra mile per gallon on the highway (33 mpg) and unchanged city fuel economy.

Unfortunately for owners, the cost of feeding the engine stands to rise. While nothing has changed with the 2.0-liter between 2016 and 2017, General Motors now requires owners to fill up on premium fuel. For the 2016 model year, GM claimed premium fuel was recommended, but not required. This could certainly take away from the satisfaction that comes from achieving slightly higher fuel economy.

While the LT solders on as a single trim line, the availability of a sport package adds some visual appeal. The package, naturally, includes 18-inch wheels and a leather-wrapped steering wheel and shift knob, as well as a blast from the past. Yes, you’l be able to get a rear spoiler for the svelte, carefully styled Malibu. Listed as a “late availability,” we assume the spoiler will be of the subtle, lip variety, because Limp Bizkit isn’t on the charts and no one in Detroit would think a wing works in this day and age.

So, if an LT offers too little but a Premier is too pricey, the sport package could partially fill in the gap, though it can’t replace the extra horsepower once found in the 2LT. Now, about that turbocharged 1.5-liter four-cylinder found in the L, LS, and LT. The engine loses three horsepower compared to last year’s model, ringing in at 160 hp. Torque is unchanged at 184 lb-ft, so don’t expect to notice a difference.

While the lower trims lose horsepower, they do gain content. Apple Car Play and Android Auto are now standard on the LS and LT, as is a 7.0-inch touchscreen for the infotainment system.

[Image: General Motors]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 59 comments
  • Xantia10000 Xantia10000 on Oct 21, 2016

    Let me answer the "puzzling" question about Sport trim levels from an OEM standpoint: it's a great profit-booster. Some customers will happily pay a few thousands extra for bigger wheels, more aggressive bumpers. spoilers, sunroofs, etc. They are relatively inexpensive and easy to make vs. upgraded engines/transmissions/diffs/etc. As companies that like to make money and make normal customers happy, 'cheesy' add-ons like these ones are a win-win.

  • Dougjp Dougjp on Oct 22, 2016

    Meanwhile the competing Ford uses the Sport name properly. GM has given up.

  • El scotto No rag-top, no rag-top(s) = not a prestigious car brand. Think it through. All of the high-end Germans and Lexus have rag-tops. Corvette is really its own brand.World-leading engines. AMG, M, S and well Lexus is third-world tough. GM makes one of the best V-8s in the world in Bowling Green. But nooooo, noooo, we're GM only Corvettes get Corvette engines. Balderdash! I say. Put Corvette engines in the top-tier Cadillacs. I know GM could make a world-class 3.5 liter V-6 but they don't or won't. In the interior everything that gets touched, including your butt, has to feel good. No exceptions.Some think that those who pay above MSRP and brag about it are idiots. Go the opposite direction, and offer an extended 10-year 100,000-mile factory warranty. At a reasonable price. That's Acura's current business model.
  • Carrera 2014 Toyota Corolla with 192,000 miles bought new. Oil changes every 5,000 miles, 1 coolant flush, and a bunch of air filters and in cabin air filters, and wipers. On my 4th set of tires.Original brake pads ( manual transmission), original spark plugs. Nothing else...it's a Toyota. Did most of oil changes either free at Toyota or myself. Also 3 batteries.2022 Acura TLX A-Spec AWD 13,000 miles now but bought new.Two oil changes...2006 Hyundai Elantra gifted from a colleague with 318,000 when I got it, and 335,000 now. It needed some TLC. A set of cheap Chinese tires ($275), AC compressor, evaporator, expansion valve package ( $290) , two TYC headlights $120, one battery ( $95), two oil changes, air filters, Denso alternator ( $185), coolant, and labor for AC job ( $200).
  • Mike-NB2 This is a mostly uninformed vote, but I'll go with the Mazda 3 too.I haven't driven a new Civic, so I can't say anything about it, but two weeks ago I had a 2023 Corolla as a rental. While I can understand why so many people buy these, I was surprised at how bad the CVT is. Many rentals I've driven have a CVT and while I know it has one and can tell, they aren't usually too bad. I'd never own a car with a CVT, but I can live with one as a rental. But the Corolla's CVT was terrible. It was like it screamed "CVT!" the whole time. On the highway with cruise control on, I could feel it adjusting to track the set speed. Passing on the highway (two-lane) was risky. The engine isn't under-powered, but the CVT makes it seem that way.A minor complaint is about the steering. It's waaaay over-assisted. At low speeds, it's like a 70s LTD with one-finger effort. Maybe that's deliberate though, given the Corolla's demographic.
  • Mike-NB2 2019 Ranger - 30,000 miles / 50,000 km. Nothing but oil changes. Original tires are being replaced a week from Wednesday. (Not all that mileage is on the original A/S tires. I put dedicated winter rims/tires on it every winter.)2024 - Golf R - 1700 miles / 2800 km. Not really broken in yet. Nothing but gas in the tank.
  • SaulTigh I've got a 2014 F150 with 87K on the clock and have spent exactly $4,180.77 in maintenance and repairs in that time. That's pretty hard to beat.Hard to say on my 2019 Mercedes, because I prepaid for three years of service (B,A,B) and am getting the last of those at the end of the month. Did just drop $1,700 on new Michelins for it at Tire Rack. Tires for the F150 late last year were under $700, so I'd say the Benz is roughly 2 to 3 times as pricy for anything over the Ford.I have the F150 serviced at a large independent shop, the Benz at the dealership.
Next