Chevrolet Colorado ZH2: Clean, Green, Quiet Warfare Awaits

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

General Motors has rolled out a unique variant of its popular midsize Chevrolet Colorado pickup in advance of U.S. military trials scheduled to begin next year.

The Colorado ZH2, seemingly plucked from the set of a Mad Max sequel, has seen its frame and body stretched, reinforced and modified to within an inch of its life, and draws its power from a hydrogen fuel cell.

If this sounds like eco-nonsense, and you’re wondering when the U.S. Navy will announce a return to sail, hold on — there are tactical advantages to the vehicle’s powertrain.

Developed in collaboration with the U.S. Army Tank Automotive Research, Development and Engineering Center (TARDEC), the vehicle went from concept to test model within a year. Naturally, GM is quite proud of this.

The U.S. Army takes possession of the vehicle next year, where “extreme field testing” will give a thumbs up or down to the future use of hydrogen vehicles in military operations.

Riding on a lengthened frame, carried by 37-inch tires and a heavily modified suspension, the ZH2 has an immediate drawback. Simply, hydrogen is an incredibly scarce power source, despite being one of the most common elements on earth. Gasoline, diesel, and even electric power is infinitely easier to find, with infrastructure solidly in place.

It’s easy to scoff at the idea of a hydrogen-fueled vehicle waltzing onto a battlefield filled with flying ordnance, or smirk at the supposed benefits of lowering emissions during messy combat operations. The ZH2, however, isn’t taking the place of a main battle tank or light armored vehicle. It’s a specialized tool, with two big advantages: portable power, and near-silent operation.

Under its hood, the ZH2 packs a Exportable Power Take-Off unit (EPTO) that GM says “allows the fuel cell to power activity away from the vehicle, such as remote locations where electric power may otherwise be unavailable.”

To pass the Army’s test, the ZH2 needs to impress in several areas. On the evaluation checklist are: near-silent operation, reduced acoustic and thermal signatures, high wheel torque, low fuel consumption, and water by-product for field use.

For a specialized mission, the ZH2 would presumably tap into a limited reserve of hydrogen at the operating base, then proceed on its relatively quiet foray into the danger zone.

According to Defense One, the vehicle starts off-road testing in January, rotating through Fort Bragg, Fort Benning, and Quantico. Some technical testing will take place in Michigan.

[Image: General Motors]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 14 comments
  • Mike-NB2 This is a mostly uninformed vote, but I'll go with the Mazda 3 too.I haven't driven a new Civic, so I can't say anything about it, but two weeks ago I had a 2023 Corolla as a rental. While I can understand why so many people buy these, I was surprised at how bad the CVT is. Many rentals I've driven have a CVT and while I know it has one and can tell, they aren't usually too bad. I'd never own a car with a CVT, but I can live with one as a rental. But the Corolla's CVT was terrible. It was like it screamed "CVT!" the whole time. On the highway with cruise control on, I could feel it adjusting to track the set speed. Passing on the highway (two-lane) was risky. The engine isn't under-powered, but the CVT makes it seem that way.A minor complaint is about the steering. It's waaaay over-assisted. At low speeds, it's like a 70s LTD with one-finger effort. Maybe that's deliberate though, given the Corolla's demographic.
  • Mike-NB2 2019 Ranger - 30,000 miles / 50,000 km. Nothing but oil changes. Original tires are being replaced a week from Wednesday. (Not all that mileage is on the original A/S tires. I put dedicated winter rims/tires on it every winter.)2024 - Golf R - 1700 miles / 2800 km. Not really broken in yet. Nothing but gas in the tank.
  • SaulTigh I've got a 2014 F150 with 87K on the clock and have spent exactly $4,180.77 in maintenance and repairs in that time. That's pretty hard to beat.Hard to say on my 2019 Mercedes, because I prepaid for three years of service (B,A,B) and am getting the last of those at the end of the month. Did just drop $1,700 on new Michelins for it at Tire Rack. Tires for the F150 late last year were under $700, so I'd say the Benz is roughly 2 to 3 times as pricy for anything over the Ford.I have the F150 serviced at a large independent shop, the Benz at the dealership.
  • Bike Rather have a union negotiating my pay rises with inflation at the moment.
  • Bike Poor Redapple won't be sitting down for a while after opening that can of Whiparse
Next