Alfa Romeo SUV Will Arrive in America With Baggage

by Matt Posky

Published: October 14th, 2016

alfa romeo suv will arrive in america with baggage

Fiat Chrysler Automobiles will introduce its all-new Alfa Romeo SUV at the Los Angeles Auto Show to a crowd of interested enthusiasts and wary prospective buyers.It’s called the Stelvio and while the model isn’t necessarily the cause of the wariness, Fiat’s handling of the brand is. With plenty of options in the premium compact SUV segment and no shortage of sales turmoil and delays within FCA’s Italian ranks, will buyers take a chance on Alfa?Alfa Romeo’s reintroduction to the North American market has been a mess. Fiat delayed the Giulia endlessly due to poor crash test ratings and being “ technically immature,” according to FCA CEO Sergio Marchionne. When the car finally came out last month, it sold just seven units in the U.S.The company also cancelled plans for a larger flagship sedan to compete with the BMW 5-Series. It stopped development on a roadster based on Fiat’s 124 Spider, and it is still deciding what platform to use for their compact Giulietta — not knowing if it should be front or rear-wheel drive. The only horse in Alfa’s stable with a clear course of action is the 4C, and that model is staying the course.Alfa Romeo, a supposedly premium brand, doesn’t even have its own showrooms. It’s forced to share space with Fiat, which has suffered a steady and fairly serious sales drop. Some standalone dealers have closed down, with leftover vehicles making their way to Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram dealerships. None of this seems fitting of a high-end luxury brand, and it does little to help FCA’s goal of raising the brand’s profile in the U.S.That doesn’t inspire a lot of faith in the brand’s U.S. future. While some enthusiasts may overlook this and buy a Giulia based on “passion” and automotive heritage, many more will be wooed by traditional brands. That’s the problem the Stelvio will have to overcome, no matter how good it looks come November.That said, SUVs have been the savior of many struggling premium automakers in the recent past, from Jaguar to Bentley and even Porsche. Time will tell if the public’s ravenous appetite for utility vehicles lifts Alfa’s fortunes.[Source: The Detroit News] [Image: The Car Spy/ Wikimedia Commons ( CC BY-SA 2.0)]

#AlfaRomeo #AlfaRomeoStelvio #CompactCrossovers #LAAutoShow #NewCars #Stelvio

Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 38 comments

RHD on Oct 17, 2016

How about the Swinger? It starts with S, has seven letters, will be understood by the age demographic that remembers that Alfa Romeo used to sell cars here, and will be seen by so few people that it won't matter that it's kind of silly.

Like Reply
A4kev on Oct 18, 2016

npaladin2000 Although I'm almost ready to concede that you are correct visa vi the manner in which the brand has been allowed to be tarnished, I must take issue with some of the previous comments that suggest that Alfa doesn't/hasn't made solid,safe really fun cars.I speak with a bit of experience with the brand.I'm an auto tech, retired garage owner and I own a 1986 GTV6.Almost sounds like an admission of guilt eh !-I'm Canadian. Anyway all that to say - I've worked on and owned more than a few.My GTV6 has probably seen >300k miles.It's done a lot of track time and I always drove to and from the track eg.Watkin's Glen 400miles each way and a wicked track.My car has always come home smiling.Have I done work on her ? Yes regular maintenance and a head rebuild, more because I was chasing 7 extra hp.than because it needed it.Engine was using a ltr.every 2k miles, valve seals, but now she's back to zero consumption.Guess the lower end,pistons & rings aren't too badly engineered, that's >300k miles. Alfas are great cars that are reliable in very important ways. They are also supremely safe in an intelligent fashion.They are really well balanced cars often 50/50 such as my GTV6.They have extraordinary brakes and Alfa figured out it was advantageous to fire the engine under the car in a head-on collision back in the late 60's So if the spirit off Alfa still lives within the Fiat organization, I believe it does, then we should give them a fare shake in N.A.until the evidence is in. If we don't we risk losing an opportunity to broaden our options in a market where cars/Suvs are becoming somewhat generic. Bye the way how about taking the Guilia Quadrifoglio with a 505-hp 2.9-liter twin-turbo V-6 and call the damn thing the Demon.Not a 340 Wedge but man does it ever act sacrilegiously !

Like Reply

Recent Comments

FreedMike Not surprisingly, I have some ideas. What Cadillac needs, I think, is a statement. They don’t really have an identity. They’re trying a statement car with the Celestiq, and while that’s the right idea, it has the wrong styling and a really wrong price tag. So, here’s a first step: instead of a sedan, do a huge, fast, capable and ridiculously smooth and quiet electric touring coupe. If you want an example of what I’m thinking of, check out the magnificent Rolls-Royce Spectre. But this Cadillac coupe would be uniquely American, it’d be named “Eldorado,” and it’d be a lot cheaper than the $450,000 Spectre – call it a buck twenty-five, with a range of bespoke options for prospective buyers that would make each one somewhat unique. Make it 220 inches long, on the same platform as the Celestiq, give it retro ‘60s styling (or you could do a ‘50s or ‘70s throwback, I suppose), and at least 700 horsepower, standard. Why electric? It’s the ultimate throwback to ‘60s powertrains: effortlessly fast, smooth, and quiet, but with a ton more horsepower. It’s the perfect drivetrain for a dignified touring coupe. In fact, I’d skip any mention of environmental responsibility in this car’s marketing – sell it on how it drives, period.  How many would they sell? Not many. But the point of the exercise is to do something that will turn heads and show people what this brand can do.  Second step: give the lineup a mix of electric and gas models, and make Cadillac gas engines bespoke to the brand. If they need to use generic GM engine designs, fine – take those engines and massage them thoroughly into something special to Cadillac, with specific tuning and output. No Cadillac should leave the factory with an engine straight out of a Malibu or a four-banger Silverado. Third step: a complete line-wide interior redo. Stop the cheapness that’s all over the current sedans and crossovers. Just stop it. Use the Lyriq as a blueprint – it’s a big improvement over the current crop and a good first step. I’d also say Cadillac has a good blend of screen-controlled and switch-controlled user interfaces; don’t give into the haptic-touch and wall-to-wall screen thing. (On the subject of Caddy interiors – as much as I bag on the Celestiq, check out the interior on that thing. Wow.)Fourth step: Blackwing All The Things – some gas, others electric. And keep the electric/gas mix so buyers have a choice.Fifth step: be patient. That’s not easy, but if they’re doing a brand reset, it’ll take time. 
NJRide So if GM was serious about selling this why no updates for so long? Or make something truly unique instead of something that looked like a downmarket Altima?
Kmars2009 I rented one last fall while visiting Ohio. Not a bad car...but not a great car either. I think it needs a new version. But CUVs are King... unfortunately!
Ajla Remember when Cadillac introduced an entirely new V8 and proceeded to install it in only 800 cars before cancelling everything?
Bouzouki Cadillac (aka GM!!) made so many mistakes over the past 40 years, right up to today, one could make a MBA course of it. Others have alluded to them, there is not enough room for me to recite them in a flowing, cohesive manner.Cadillac today is literally a tarted-up Chevrolet. They are nice cars, and the "aura" of the Cadillac name still works on several (mostly female) consumers who are not car enthusiasts.The CT4 and CT5 offer superlative ride and handling, and even performance--but, it is wrapped in sheet metal that (at least I think) looks awful, with (still) sub-par interiors. They are niche cars. They are the last gasp of the Alpha platform--which I have been told by people close to it, was meant to be a Pontiac "BMW 3-series". The bankruptcy killed Pontiac, but the Alpha had been mostly engineered, so it was "Cadillac-ized" with the new "edgy" CTS styling.Most Cadillacs sold are crossovers. The most profitable "Cadillac" is the Escalade (note that GM never jack up the name on THAT!).The question posed here is rather irrelevant. NO ONE has "a blank check", because GM (any company or corporation) does not have bottomless resources.Better styling, and superlative "performance" (by that, I mean being among the best in noise, harshness, handling, performance, reliablity, quality) would cost a lot of money.Post-bankruptcy GM actually tried. No one here mentioned GM's effort to do just that: the "Omega" platform, aka CT6.The (horribly misnamed) CT6 was actually a credible Mercedes/Lexus competitor. I'm sure it cost GM a fortune to develop (the platform was unique, not shared with any other car. The top-of-the-line ORIGINAL Blackwing V8 was also unique, expensive, and ultimately...very few were sold. All of this is a LOT of money).I used to know the sales numbers, and my sense was the CT6 sold about HALF the units GM projected. More importantly, it sold about half to two thirds the volume of the S-Class (which cost a lot more in 201x)Many of your fixed cost are predicated on volume. One way to improve your business case (if the right people want to get the Green Light) is to inflate your projected volumes. This lowers the unit cost for seats, mufflers, control arms, etc, and makes the vehicle more profitable--on paper.Suppliers tool up to make the number of parts the carmaker projects. However, if the volume is less than expected, the automaker has to make up the difference.So, unfortunately, not only was the CT6 an expensive car to build, but Cadillac's weak "brand equity" limited how much GM could charge (and these were still pricey cars in 2016-18, a "base" car was ).Other than the name, the "Omega" could have marked the starting point for Cadillac to once again be the standard of the world. Other than the awful name (Fleetwood, Elegante, Paramount, even ParAMOUR would be better), and offering the basest car with a FOUR cylinder turbo on the base car (incredibly moronic!), it was very good car and a CREDIBLE Mercedes S-Class/Lexus LS400 alternative. While I cannot know if the novel aluminum body was worth the cost (very expensive and complex to build), the bragging rights were legit--a LARGE car that was lighter, but had good body rigidity. No surprise, the interior was not the best, but the gap with the big boys was as close as GM has done in the luxury sphere.Mary Barra decided that profits today and tomorrow were more important than gambling on profits in 2025 and later. Having sunk a TON of money, and even done a mid-cycle enhancement, complete with the new Blackwing engine (which copied BMW with the twin turbos nestled in the "V"!), in fall 2018 GM announced it was discontinuing the car, and closing the assembly plant it was built in. (And so you know, building different platforms on the same line is very challenging and considerably less efficient in terms of capital and labor costs than the same platform, or better yet, the same model).So now, GM is anticipating that, as the car market "goes electric" (if you can call it that--more like the Federal Government and EU and even China PUSHING electric cars), they can make electric Cadillacs that are "prestige". The Cadillac Celestique is the opening salvo--$340,000. We will see how it works out.