Ace of Base Redux: 1990 Toyota 4Runner

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

As the calendar flipped out of the coked-up 80s and into the next decade, the mash-up that was Diamond Star Motors cranked out all-wheel drive turbo coupes, Chevy unleashed the ZR-1 (with the hyphen, thank you very much), and we were watching Robert Duvall play an excellent portrayal of Harry Hyde.

Toyota, for its part, launched a new 4Runner sporting handsome and cleanly contoured sheetmetal, arriving at the perfect time to ride the wave of customers who were suddenly trading their cars for SUVs.


The 4Runner had been around since 1984, based off the Pickup/Hilux platform and providing off-road chops to challenge the original Cherokee. For its ’90 redesign (available in calendar year ’89), Toyota saw fit to depart from the agricultural roots of the OG 4Runner, which was essentially a pickup truck with a fiberglass cap grafted onto the box and some extra seats designed to skirt the chicken tax. Thankfully, Toyota retained the excellent fold-down tailgate.

Buyers would find the new-for-’90 4Runner had a remarkably high floor, ensuring folks who wanted an SUV simply for the image would take one look at the liftover height into the cargo area and make a beeline to the nearest Ford store, signing the note on one of those new Explorers. If a poser managed to make it past the jump-up-into-the-driver’s-seat cost of entry, at least we knew they were working for their social status. Making it up into the driver’s seat, buyers of base models were greeted by a full compliment of easy-to-read gauges, reclining cloth buckets, and a full fabric headliner. Hey, this was heady stuff back then.

If it appeared 4Runner drivers were especially sweaty, that probably meant they were either eating too many 3D Doritos (remember those?) or were wrangling a base model SR5, where power steering was not standard equipment. Yes, power steering was an option as late as 1990, but think of all the money drivers saved on a gym membership. P90X was still twenty years away.

Base 4Runners of this vintage were equipped with a five-speed stick and Toyota’s legendary 22RE fuel-injected SOHC four-cylinder. A 3.0-liter V6 was on offer, cranking out 150 horsepower compared to the smaller mill’s 116 hp, but the OHC six-pot proved to have head gasket issues down the road (cue the Toyota jihad that will point out gazillion-mile, trouble-free examples and proceed to burn effigies in my name). New vehicle buyers didn’t know that, of course.

Not yet swayed by today’s trend of offering vehicles with all the visual color of a Charlie Chaplin movie, the ’90 4Runner was available in no less than twelve different shades of paint and four distinct interior colors. These things look best in Cardinal Red, always have. Feel free to disagree. Feel free to be wrong.

I maintain that early 90s Toyota was peak Toyota, cranking out good looking, reliable machinery with well screwed together interiors. Asking price may have outstripped its competitors (witness a fully loaded ’90 4Runner for $25,779 or $43,943 in 2016 dollars) but, for once, buyers got what they paid for. Records show that base, rear-drive, four-door strippers checked in at close to $16,000 in 1990.

Bulletproof engine, baseball-bat shifter sticking out of the floor, rugged good looks, and some off-road chops. If that doesn’t check off the Ace of Base boxes, I don’t know what will.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
11 of 53 comments
  • Bumpy ii Bumpy ii on Oct 20, 2016

    This is my favorite 4Runner body, although the late-90s ones are better trucks. Japanese Classics had some holy-grail Hilux Surfs come in a while back: http://www.japaneseclassics.com/vehicle/1990-toyota-hilux-surf-ssr/ https://www.japaneseclassics.com/vehicle/1990-toyota-hilux/

    • See 6 previous
    • Gtem Gtem on Oct 21, 2016

      @Corey Lewis bumpy I drove our rental '94 Corolla like this but very beat up: sc01.alicdn.com/kf/HTB1clgBJFXXXXcQXXXXq6xXFXXXc/Toyota-Corolla-Van-Ee102.jpg when we visited in '04, RHD, a courier variant with a vinyl interior, 4spd stick, leaf spring rear end, steel bars protecting the inside of the cargo compartment glass and a factory "400kg" sticker on the hatch. I was just learning how to drive stick at the time, and I didn't find it very unusual at all to do the left hand shift. The pattern is oriented the same and your feet are still pressing the same pedals, it was no big deal IMO.

  • White Shadow White Shadow on Oct 20, 2016

    My buddy got one of these brand new the first year they came out. It was an underpowered pig even back then. Today, an old lady with a walker could outrun one. Yes, I know that it's not supposed to be fast, but it's so ridiculously slow that it's laughable.

    • See 1 previous
    • Carlson Fan Carlson Fan on Oct 20, 2016

      Well they aren't that bad at least with the 5 speed. But my biggest gripe with my '93 PU (3.0 V6/stick) was the lack of low end grunt when towing. With nothing hooked to the back it as plenty fast. It was great truck & I'd buy it all over again because every other compact truck at the time (foreign & domestic) sucked compared to that Toyota.

  • L&L I have a 2004 Xb right now the odometer reads 265,000 miles no mayor issues ,pay 14,500 . you don't need complaints about this lunch box the best .
  • Jeanbaptiste 2022 Tesla model 3 performance ~35000 miles tires - ~$1000ish. Several cabin filters ~$50
  • El scotto No rag-top, no rag-top(s) = not a prestigious car brand. Think it through. All of the high-end Germans and Lexus have rag-tops. Corvette is really its own brand.World-leading engines. AMG, M, S and well Lexus is third-world tough. GM makes one of the best V-8s in the world in Bowling Green. But nooooo, noooo, we're GM only Corvettes get Corvette engines. Balderdash! I say. Put Corvette engines in the top-tier Cadillacs. I know GM could make a world-class 3.5 liter V-6 but they don't or won't. In the interior everything that gets touched, including your butt, has to feel good. No exceptions.Some think that those who pay above MSRP and brag about it are idiots. Go the opposite direction, and offer an extended 10-year 100,000-mile factory warranty. At a reasonable price. That's Acura's current business model.
  • Carrera 2014 Toyota Corolla with 192,000 miles bought new. Oil changes every 5,000 miles, 1 coolant flush, and a bunch of air filters and in cabin air filters, and wipers. On my 4th set of tires.Original brake pads ( manual transmission), original spark plugs. Nothing else...it's a Toyota. Did most of oil changes either free at Toyota or myself. Also 3 batteries.2022 Acura TLX A-Spec AWD 13,000 miles now but bought new.Two oil changes...2006 Hyundai Elantra gifted from a colleague with 318,000 when I got it, and 335,000 now. It needed some TLC. A set of cheap Chinese tires ($275), AC compressor, evaporator, expansion valve package ( $290) , two TYC headlights $120, one battery ( $95), two oil changes, air filters, Denso alternator ( $185), coolant, and labor for AC job ( $200).
  • Mike-NB2 This is a mostly uninformed vote, but I'll go with the Mazda 3 too.I haven't driven a new Civic, so I can't say anything about it, but two weeks ago I had a 2023 Corolla as a rental. While I can understand why so many people buy these, I was surprised at how bad the CVT is. Many rentals I've driven have a CVT and while I know it has one and can tell, they aren't usually too bad. I'd never own a car with a CVT, but I can live with one as a rental. But the Corolla's CVT was terrible. It was like it screamed "CVT!" the whole time. On the highway with cruise control on, I could feel it adjusting to track the set speed. Passing on the highway (two-lane) was risky. The engine isn't under-powered, but the CVT makes it seem that way.A minor complaint is about the steering. It's waaaay over-assisted. At low speeds, it's like a 70s LTD with one-finger effort. Maybe that's deliberate though, given the Corolla's demographic.
Next