Chevrolet Hopes $37,495 Is Low Enough to Lure Buyers Into the Bolt

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

After revealing the 2017 Chevrolet Bolt’s surprising EPA-estimated range (238 miles), General Motors has now rolled out the price for its long-awaited electric car.

What will it take to get into Chevy’s EV? $37,495, which includes destination. A federal tax credit lowers that to $29,995, or five bucks below the “affordable car threshold” so sought after by EV builders.

GM touts the hatchback Bolt as the first affordable long-range electric vehicle, clearly enjoying the year-long lead it has on rival Tesla. The first Bolts should appear onto select dealer lots in December, while Tesla’s EV for the masses — the Model 3 — isn’t due until late next year.

In Canada, the Bolt carries an MSRP of $42,795, plus a $1,600 fright charge. Depending on the province, government EV incentives could lower that price significantly. In Ontario, the entry price would come to $33,034, including freight.

In the U.S., the federal tax credit only applies to the first 200,000 Bolts produced. GM would like the Bolt to do well, but EVs are still a niche market, despite the 373,000 reservations for the Model 3. Don’t feel the need to hurry to avoid missing out on that tax credit.

Contrasting the Bolt and its chief rival, which will be the second “affordable” long-range EV, the Bolt has the upper hand in range (238 miles versus the Model 3’s 215), but the Tesla undercuts it in price. Tesla CEO Elon Musk is adamant that the Model 3 will start around $35,000 before the tax credit.

That price could easily change, as could the Model 3’s range, as a lot can happen in the course of a year. Tesla claims its low-cost EV’s battery will be smaller than 60 kWh, which happens to be the size of the Bolt’s battery pack. It wouldn’t be a surprise to see Musk tack a few more miles onto his range estimate.

[Image: General Motors]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 84 comments
  • SCE to AUX It's a good thing automatic braking systems are being mandated. /s
  • Theflyersfan Here's where Mazda's lineup isn't making sense. I thought they said when the CX-50 was released that it was replacing the CX-5. Which makes sense - the 5 is older and the 50 is a redone 5. But they're not putting the hybrid into the newer car? And risking stealing sales from each other? This is like the odd CX-70/90 setup where they are the exact same vehicle, including the rear cup holders, except for a third row. Maybe they have a master plan...
  • FreedMike If the system on this model is as good as the one on the CX-90 PHEV, it would be well worth your time to check out.
  • FreedMike Soooo...who the hell came up with the name "Zoox"?
  • ChristianWimmer EV sales have crashed in Germany and Mercedes’ is feeling the heat. They were ready to drop the ICE and go full EV, but now they claim they will produce what the customer wants - and the customer in Germany/worldwide overwhelmingly wants internal combustion engines and not EVs.Personally I have no issue with the 4-cylinder AMG motor in the AMG C-Class or in the new SL since modern 4-cylinders are great in the NVH department. At least buyers now have a choice of a 4-cylinder, inline-6 or a V8. Bring back the V12 while they are it!!!!
Next