Aston Martin Will Sell You a House … and a Boat

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

The Aston Martin Cygnet was just the beginning.

For those who thought the luxury automaker’s now-defunct rebadged Toyota city car was a weird idea (and that includes just about everyone), just wait. Aston Martin is now eager to sell you anything — your clothes, your baby stroller, and even your house.

The automaker just opened a retail store in one of London’s ritziest neighborhoods, tempting shoppers with every article you’d need to live the Aston Martin lifestyle. Well, not everything, but CEO Andy Palmer wants to see to that.

According to Bloomberg, the company’s Mayfair shopping district outlet sells a range of consumer goods, including fine china, a baby stroller, or weekend bags. (The stroller retails for $3,980, which could land someone a really decent used Cygnet.) The automaker, which is still independent and thus financially vulnerable, wants to expand its brand beyond luxury sport coupes.

Way beyond.

“Wouldn’t it be great if you’re down in a luxury harbor somewhere staying in an Aston Martin apartment, with your Aston Martin parked in the car park, and your Aston Martin boat harbored outside,” Palmer told Bloomberg at yesterday’s shop opening.

He’s not kidding. The first Aston Martin yacht sails to its first customer later this month.

A look inside No. 8 Dover Street – the newly opened Aston Martin brand experience boutique in Mayfair pic.twitter.com/W2GZGCnv49

— Aston Martin (@astonmartin) September 2, 2016

Selling branded merchandise is a growing trend among luxury automakers. Ferrari wants people to buy its lineup of swag, so why not Aston Martin? In Britain especially, the brand is already associated with the Savile Row suits and other designer duds worn by a DB5-driving Sean Connery. The connection is there.

Ferrari saw some backlash from fans and owners who didn’t like the brand cheapened by branded ball caps, but Palmer isn’t worried. First off, there aren’t many ball caps in the store.

“There is clearly a place for fans of the brand — they go into our dealer and they buy a t-shirt and that’s fine,” he told Bloomberg. “But this is an expression of what Aston stands for.”

Aston Martin wants its finances in order before it issues an IPO, and has a plan to return to profitability by 2018. Meanwhile, Palmer absolutely loves Brexit, because the lowered currency boosts the amount of money coming in from non-British sales.

“Whether it helps in the two years from now when we actually make an exit — if that’s when it is — I don’t know, but right now the weak pound is wonderful,” he said.

[Image: Aston Martin]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 20 comments
  • Inside Looking Out Inside Looking Out on Sep 04, 2016

    And you all were complained about Cadillac. So European brands are allowed to do that American not? BTW head of Cadillac is also European, you know.

  • Sprocketboy Sprocketboy on Sep 04, 2016

    We'll see how much Mr. Palmer likes Brexit when he has to start paying for those AMG engines from Germany, to say nothing of the Chinese accelerator pedals.

  • Teddyc73 As I asked earlier under another article, when did "segment" or "class" become "space"? Does using that term make one feel more sophisticated? If GM's products in other segments...I mean "space" is more profitable then sedans then why shouldn't they discontinue it.
  • Robert Absolutely!!! I hate SUV's , I like the better gas milage and better ride and better handling!! Can't take a SUV 55mph into a highway exit ramp! I can in my Malibu and there's more than enough room for 5 and trunk is plenty big enough for me!
  • Teddyc73 Since when did automakers or car companies become "OEM". Probably about the same time "segment" or "class" became "space". I wish there were more sedans. I would like an American sedan. However, as others have stated, if they don't sell in large enough quantities to be profitable the automakers...I mean, "OEMs" aren't going to build them. It's simple business.
  • Varezhka I have still yet to see a Malibu on the road that didn't have a rental sticker. So yeah, GM probably lost money on every one they sold but kept it to boost their CAFE numbers.I'm personally happy that I no longer have to dread being "upgraded" to a Maxima or a Malibu anymore. And thankfully Altima is also on its way out.
  • Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
Next