No Investigation After Senators Demand Probe Into Massive Takata Truck Blast

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

The company behind the massive recall of potentially explosive airbags won’t face a federal investigation after one of its trucks crashed and exploded on a Texas highway.

A transport truck carrying ammonium nitrate propellant and airbag inflators detonated last week, killing the occupant of a nearby home and leaving the truck in pieces. After two U.S. senators demanded a probe, the National Transportation Safety Board now claims that Takata followed the rules.

Earlier today, Reuters reported that two U.S. senators — Richard Blumenthal (D-Connecticut) and Edward Markey (D-Massachusetts) — called on the National Transportation Safety Bureau to investigate the accident. Their goal was to see if Takata, whose airbag inflators are linked to 14 deaths and 150 injuries, followed proper safety precautions.

Reuters has now reported that the NTSB has given Takata the all-clear. The agency claims it checked with parties involved in the explosion and determined the materials were transported in a safe manner.

The blast served to highlight the volatile nature of ammonium nitrate, the chemical at the heart of the Takata recall. Heat and humidity can break down the hard ammonium nitrate pellet in Takata airbag inflators, gradually giving it extra explosive power. The blasts can then rupture the airbag and send metal shrapnel into an occupant.

According to The New York Times, the explosion has raised concerns about volatile cargo being transported through American cities. Photos of the blast site published with their report, showing the smoking foundations of a leveled home and a truck frame split in half, will no doubt raise more.

The blast occurred in Quemado, Texas, near the Mexican border. In the early morning hours of August 22, the truck swerved off the road and crashed. A fire broke out, and the two drivers fled. The resulting explosion injured the drivers, the occupants of a nearby car, and killed Lucila Robles in a nearby home. Her remains were found two days later.

Takata’s distribution centre is in nearby Eagle Pass, Texas, and the propellant must be shipped from a supplier in Moses Lake, Washington. During the 36-hour trip, the trucks pass through Boise, Idaho; Salt Lake City, Utah; and Albuquerque, New Mexico. Drivers must be equipped with safety equipment, including fire-retardant clothing and goggles.

Even when shipped properly, any volatile cargo can pose a danger if an accident occurs. It’s an accepted risk, as goods need to be transported somehow.

Speaking to the New York Times, Glenn P. Wicks, managing director at D.C. law firm Wicks Group (specializing in hazmat transportation), said the force of the impact could have triggered an ammonium nitrate explosion all by itself.

[Image: Oregon National Guard/ Flickr]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 25 comments
  • Shortest Circuit Shortest Circuit on Sep 01, 2016

    Ammonium nitrate on its own is not that dangerous. Now if you would contaminate it with aluminium powder and store it in plastic drums, that is another matter altogether - solid rocket propellant. AN when heated can be dangerous on its own as around the same temperature as steel beams lose their structural rigidity, AN begins to dissociate to nitrogen and oxygen, essentially burning itself up. Now while burning it gets to the trucks aluminium cargo floor/wall... well then you have a problem which the drivers reacted with the appropriate reaction: *cue Chris Rock* RUN! And run quickly as it is pretty hard to put out an oxidizer fire.

  • NeilM NeilM on Sep 01, 2016

    "In the early morning hours of August 22, the truck swerved off the road and crashed." Bad truck! Bad, bad truck!

  • Jeanbaptiste 2022 Tesla model 3 performance ~35000 miles tires - ~$1000ish. Several cabin filters ~$50
  • El scotto No rag-top, no rag-top(s) = not a prestigious car brand. Think it through. All of the high-end Germans and Lexus have rag-tops. Corvette is really its own brand.World-leading engines. AMG, M, S and well Lexus is third-world tough. GM makes one of the best V-8s in the world in Bowling Green. But nooooo, noooo, we're GM only Corvettes get Corvette engines. Balderdash! I say. Put Corvette engines in the top-tier Cadillacs. I know GM could make a world-class 3.5 liter V-6 but they don't or won't. In the interior everything that gets touched, including your butt, has to feel good. No exceptions.Some think that those who pay above MSRP and brag about it are idiots. Go the opposite direction, and offer an extended 10-year 100,000-mile factory warranty. At a reasonable price. That's Acura's current business model.
  • Carrera 2014 Toyota Corolla with 192,000 miles bought new. Oil changes every 5,000 miles, 1 coolant flush, and a bunch of air filters and in cabin air filters, and wipers. On my 4th set of tires.Original brake pads ( manual transmission), original spark plugs. Nothing else...it's a Toyota. Did most of oil changes either free at Toyota or myself. Also 3 batteries.2022 Acura TLX A-Spec AWD 13,000 miles now but bought new.Two oil changes...2006 Hyundai Elantra gifted from a colleague with 318,000 when I got it, and 335,000 now. It needed some TLC. A set of cheap Chinese tires ($275), AC compressor, evaporator, expansion valve package ( $290) , two TYC headlights $120, one battery ( $95), two oil changes, air filters, Denso alternator ( $185), coolant, and labor for AC job ( $200).
  • Mike-NB2 This is a mostly uninformed vote, but I'll go with the Mazda 3 too.I haven't driven a new Civic, so I can't say anything about it, but two weeks ago I had a 2023 Corolla as a rental. While I can understand why so many people buy these, I was surprised at how bad the CVT is. Many rentals I've driven have a CVT and while I know it has one and can tell, they aren't usually too bad. I'd never own a car with a CVT, but I can live with one as a rental. But the Corolla's CVT was terrible. It was like it screamed "CVT!" the whole time. On the highway with cruise control on, I could feel it adjusting to track the set speed. Passing on the highway (two-lane) was risky. The engine isn't under-powered, but the CVT makes it seem that way.A minor complaint is about the steering. It's waaaay over-assisted. At low speeds, it's like a 70s LTD with one-finger effort. Maybe that's deliberate though, given the Corolla's demographic.
  • Mike-NB2 2019 Ranger - 30,000 miles / 50,000 km. Nothing but oil changes. Original tires are being replaced a week from Wednesday. (Not all that mileage is on the original A/S tires. I put dedicated winter rims/tires on it every winter.)2024 - Golf R - 1700 miles / 2800 km. Not really broken in yet. Nothing but gas in the tank.
Next