Junkyard Find: 1989 Plymouth Reliant America

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

In last week’s Junkyard Find, I shared the first discarded BMW E30 I have photographed after nearly a decade of writing about junkyard vehicles. Yes, the E30 was a fine automobile (though right-thinking car experts recognize that its Alfa Romeo Milano competitor was faster, cheaper, and had a much better-sounding engine) and we should take a moment to appreciate this important piece of German automotive history.

Right, now that we’re done with that, let’s admire a piece of automotive history I find much more fascinating: an example of the final model year of Chrysler’s company-rescuing K-Car, photographed in a muggy, buggy, cocklebur-overgrown Minneapolis self-service yard.

Of course, we all know that various K-platform-derived and K-platform-related vehicles — influenced by the design of the Simca/Chrysler Europe Omnirizon platform, just to add some more branches to the K family tree — rolled off the showroom floors well into the 1990s, but the group of true K-Cars is limited to just the Dodge Aries, Dodge 400, Chrysler LeBaron, and Plymouth Reliant. Eventually, Renault DNA (via the Eagle Premier, after Chrysler’s absorption of American Motors) supplanted K-platform data in Chrysler’s genome. Still, the end of the line for the Plymouth Reliant was a bittersweet milestone for Chrysler.

Under the hood: a fuel-injected version of the versatile Chrysler 2.2-liter four-cylinder, in this case making 93 horsepower.

This one has “Reliant LE” emblems on the quarter windows, but there are no “LE” decklid badges and the build tag says it’s a base-model Reliant America. The ’89 Reliant America two-door listed at $6,995, which was way cheaper (and bigger) than the $9,057 Ford Tempo or the $8,849 Pontiac Sunbird. Car shoppers had lost their enthusiasm for the Reliant by that time, though.

My parents fled Minnesota in a new 1973 Chevy Beauville van when I was in the first grade, but I go back every so often to see relatives and experience rusty cars. This one is pretty solid for a 27-year-old Upper Midwest machine.

My personal experience with the Reliant has been pretty miserable, but I will refrain from any “worst car ever built” tirades here (anyway, the wretched X-body Pontiac Phoenix takes that prize in my book).

The pride is back!

[Images: © 2016 Murilee Martin/The Truth About Cars]





Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 48 comments
  • JLGOLDEN JLGOLDEN on Aug 26, 2016

    Summer of 1989: My first job, at age 16, was at a brand-new Chrysler-Plymouth dealer in Houston. I fondly recall these spanking-new '89 Reliants coming off the convoy truck. I'd remove the plastic wrapping from seats, install wheel covers, do a quick road test, and do much of the PDI. However, for not much more dinero, the all-new Acclaim looked and felt tremendously better.

    • See 1 previous
    • NoGoYo NoGoYo on Aug 27, 2016

      The Reliant must have felt absolutely horrid, my sister's Acclaim had zero steering feel (and plenty of play) and the non-reclining bench seat was uncomfortable.

  • Tsoden Tsoden on Aug 30, 2016

    Gotta dig that 8.9% financing of $500 cash back offer.... I learned to drive in an 84 Plymouth Voyager with the 2.6 L 4. Oh the memories of spoiled milkshake in the carpet, leaky power steering fluid on the lane-way, AC that was as cold as an osculating fan in a sauna, The bright burgundy interior with the complimentary silver streak paint and the mandatory wood grain vinyl strip on the LE models... My father acquired my grandmothers 13 year old 1985 Dodge Aries... It only had 36000 KM on it as it was driven in a small town of 1500 people. the longest trek was about 40 KM every couple weeks. I really loved that car. It had the 2.6L it was a real hoot to drive - quite a bit peppier than the Voyager. This car was silver with the gunmetal blue interior, AC that was actually cold, and front bucket seats which were really comfortable (how Chrysler lost its way with seat comfort over the years is beyond me). The only thing about this car was it tend to float over potholes and bumps and then rebound like a bouncy castle....perfect for making passengers sea sick.

  • Mike-NB2 This is a mostly uninformed vote, but I'll go with the Mazda 3 too.I haven't driven a new Civic, so I can't say anything about it, but two weeks ago I had a 2023 Corolla as a rental. While I can understand why so many people buy these, I was surprised at how bad the CVT is. Many rentals I've driven have a CVT and while I know it has one and can tell, they aren't usually too bad. I'd never own a car with a CVT, but I can live with one as a rental. But the Corolla's CVT was terrible. It was like it screamed "CVT!" the whole time. On the highway with cruise control on, I could feel it adjusting to track the set speed. Passing on the highway (two-lane) was risky. The engine isn't under-powered, but the CVT makes it seem that way.A minor complaint is about the steering. It's waaaay over-assisted. At low speeds, it's like a 70s LTD with one-finger effort. Maybe that's deliberate though, given the Corolla's demographic.
  • Mike-NB2 2019 Ranger - 30,000 miles / 50,000 km. Nothing but oil changes. Original tires are being replaced a week from Wednesday. (Not all that mileage is on the original A/S tires. I put dedicated winter rims/tires on it every winter.)2024 - Golf R - 1700 miles / 2800 km. Not really broken in yet. Nothing but gas in the tank.
  • SaulTigh I've got a 2014 F150 with 87K on the clock and have spent exactly $4,180.77 in maintenance and repairs in that time. That's pretty hard to beat.Hard to say on my 2019 Mercedes, because I prepaid for three years of service (B,A,B) and am getting the last of those at the end of the month. Did just drop $1,700 on new Michelins for it at Tire Rack. Tires for the F150 late last year were under $700, so I'd say the Benz is roughly 2 to 3 times as pricy for anything over the Ford.I have the F150 serviced at a large independent shop, the Benz at the dealership.
  • Bike Rather have a union negotiating my pay rises with inflation at the moment.
  • Bike Poor Redapple won't be sitting down for a while after opening that can of Whiparse
Next