Ace of Base: Mazda3 I Sport

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

Base model. What does that image conjure to mind? Vinyl seats? Tinny AM radio? A low rent penalty box on wheels? A few years ago, you’d be right on the money. Driving misery was available for voluntary purchase at the showrooms of just about every major car maker.

Now, though … it’s tougher to find, but there are entry-level vehicles out there that, in their cheapest guise, won’t make you cringe with each pull of the driver’s door handle. These base models? They’ve aced it. Here’s a good example.

Third instalments in a series are rarely the best, with the possible exception of Super Mario 3 on NES. The third-gen Mazda3 showed up in 2013 with Mazda’s snazzy KODO design language and a colour palette including hues other than grey, white, and black.

Allow me an aside here. It drives me to arson when manufacturers penalize the thrifty by only offering drab colours on their base models. Or, if we are deemed worthy of a vibrant shade, it often costs a few hundred dollars. At this end of the price spectrum, it adds a Texas-sized percentage to the MSRP. Weighted, a $300 paint option on a $17,485 car is roughly equal to paying $1,200 for paint on a fully loaded F-150 Limited (limited only, of course, to however many they can build). Mazda charges $0 for the Deep Crystal Blue Mica is shown here. Members of the Brown Car Appreciation Society may appreciate the $0 Titanium Flash Mica.

Keyless entry, Bluetooth, tilt and telescopic steering wheel … features once paid for dearly by Mercedes customers are now standard for us proles buying a base-model Mazda3. Air conditioning is along for the ride, as is cruise control and a backup camera.

Two optional equipment packages dot the options list: a $1,000 preferred equipment package brings heated body-color mirrors, electronic driving aids, and 16-inch alloys to the party. Buyers who spring for the $1,300 Appearance Package will find their Mazda3 i Sport adorned with a black front air dam and — what’s this? — a completely superfluous rear diffuser. A rear diffuser is about as necessary on a Mazda3 as condoms in a convent. Mazda’s 3 drives quite well for an economy car, but it ain’t a LaFerrari. Leaving these option packages on the shelf will net a sticker price of $17,845 plus a $835 destination fee.

Sure, Mazda is a sales Hindenburg right now, but that doesn’t mean the 3 is a bad car. As our own Tim Cain points out, popularity contests don’t provide a clear understanding of class leadership.

Not every base model has aced it. The ones which have? They help make the automotive landscape a lot better. Any others you can think of, B&B? Let us know in the comments. And of course, feel free to eviscerate today’s choice.

The model above is shown in American dollars with American options and trim — apple pie and bald eagles not included. As always, your dealer may sell for less. In the case of Mazda, they probably will.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 153 comments
  • Chiefmonkey Chiefmonkey on Aug 09, 2016

    Actually, every time I see one of these, I can't help but think how cheaply put together and generally cut rate they look; ie, absolutely horrific fit and finish (look at those panel gaps!) For true value one's best options at/near this price range might be a Jetta 1.4t or Verano 1SV

  • Sid SB Sid SB on Aug 09, 2016

    Base Mazda 3 Manual vs equivalent Civic 2.0l Manual and Golf Manuals would be a nice comparison to read about. We will see Si vs GTI vs ST comparisons everywhere, but what is the best bargain entry manual? Mazda 3i has a shot.

  • Make_light I like Subarus, and I often think they don't get enough credit for how they drive. Lots of people say it's the faux-rugged image that accounts for their popularity, but they also drive with a solidity and plantedness that's absent from a lot of the Japanese competition. That being said, this thing is ugly. I never felt that Subarus were as ugly as commenters claim they are. Boring, sure, but not necessarily ugly. But between this and the refreshed Legacy, it's like they're trying to make their vehicles look as incohesive and awkward as possible.
  • SCE to AUX I think the 2.2 was a pretty durable engine.
  • Rochester We'll probably be trading in our 2018 Touring Edition Forester for the next model, and are waiting to see what the Hybrid is all about. Would be nice if they disclose whether or not it will be a plug-in Hybrid.
  • CEastwood I have a friend who drives an early aughts Forrester who refuses to get rid of it no matter all it's problems . I believe it's the head gasket eater edition . He takes great pains regularly putting in some additive that is supposed prevent head gasket problems only to be told by his mechanic on the latest timing belt change that the heads are staring to seep . Mechanics must love making money off those cars and their flawed engine design . Below is another satisfied customer of what has to be one of the least reliable Japanese cars .https://www.theautopian.com/i-regret-buying-a-new-subaru/
  • Wjtinfwb 157k is not insignificant, even for a Honda. A lot would depend on the maintenance records and the environment the car was operated in. Up to date maintenance and updated wear items like brakes, shocks, belts, etc. done recently? Where did those 157k miles accumulate? West Texas on open, smooth roads that are relatively easy on the chassis or Michigan, with bomb crater potholes, snow and salt that take their toll on the underpinnings. That Honda 4 will run forever with decent maintenance but the underneath bits deteriorate on a Honda just like they do on a Chevy.
Next