Piston Slap: Safe Thinking on Dry-Rotted Tires?

by Sajeev Mehta

Updated: April 11th, 2018 Published: June 28th, 2016

piston slap safe thinking on dry rotted tires

Jimmy writes:

Sajeev,

For years I traded in my Hondas and Toyotas within 18 months of purchase. However, I did not care for the newest Highlander, Pilot, and Camry, so I kept the old ones hoping the next versions would be more acceptable. While I have not had a single problem with these vehicles, with the exceptions of a few light bulbs, I’ve noticed Michelin Green X and the Continental ContiProContact have small cracks in the tread grooves. The tires have 40,000 and 55,000 miles on them with lots of tread left. I have asked tire stores and some say don’t worry while others say they are dangerous.

What is the rule for tire replacements when it comes to cracks in the tread grooves?

Sajeev answers:

A timely query: my once-new 2011 Ford Ranger is old enough for new rubber. I noticed those cracks, even with decent tread and “good” rubber between them and the wear bars. And, just like you, I certainly ain’t trading it in for a new Ranger anytime soon!

This indicates dry rotted tires, which means harder, slippery and unsafe rubber in wet/aggressive driving conditions. As the cracks grow, blow outs and tread separation failures are likely. Given the mileage, I assume your tires are also five-ish years old. Tire manufacturers have a hard stop on replacement after 10 years, while car makers (fearing Firestone-esque lawsuits?) recommend six-year replacement intervals. For a daily driven and/or primary vehicle, I’d lean closer to the six-year interval for safety concerns.

Depending on the climate (heat is the concern) and UV exposure (garaged?), I reckon we both need new tires soon. The top picture is the factory ContiTrac on my rig. The dry rot is closer to hairline cracks, not replicas of Grand Canyons. Given their admirable performance during Houston’s recent floods, these tires have several more months of life, but I’m rollin’ on borrowed time.

But looking at them up close?

Those are bigger than I remember from my last “wait for the oil to drain out” tire inspection. While I don’t see myself on a looong highway trip in the future, this is a cause for concern.

So will Sanjeev treat himself to 10 mm wider rubber so contact patch isn’t stretched so tightly and the speedo might read accurately? The autoblogosphere is dying to know!

Send your queries to sajeev@thetruthaboutcars.com. Spare no details and ask for a speedy resolution if you’re in a hurry…but be realistic, and use your make/model specific forums instead of TTAC for more timely advice.

Also, if your tires suck and you’re shopping for new tires, help support TTAC’s work by doing your research at TireReviewsandMore.com. — TTAC staff.

#DryRot #DryRotTires #DryRottedTires #Safety #Tires #TreadSeparation

Sajeev Mehta

More by Sajeev Mehta

Comments

Join the conversation

8 of 71 comments

Rpn453 on Jun 28, 2016

Those surface cracks wouldn't bother me. I've seen far worse. But I have a relatively high tolerance for risk. New tires certainly would be safer, allowing a much greater safety factor in an adverse situation such as an under-inflated tire at high speed. They'll also likely have considerably more grip. Structural problems - deformation or sidewall bubbles - are more of a concern to me. Tires with those issues should be replaced immediately. Slow right down and check things out if anything feels unusual. Any tire that's worthy of driving at highway speed should have no vibrations. The older a tire is, the more frequently and thoroughly it should be inspected.

Like Reply
Golden2husky on Jun 28, 2016

I have noticed that Michelin tires seem to be more prone to cracking that other brands. The MXV4s that I put on my station car had cracking between the treads after 7 years of being outside. Still had tread life but they failed inspection. Funny, my Michelin bicycle tires did the same thing...

Like Reply
- See 5 previous
- ToddAtlasF1 on Jun 29, 2016
  
  Michelins are the worst culprits for dry rotting, but they're also the tires most likely to still have tread and no wear pattern issues after years of use. That's the excuse Michelin partisans use in the industry, but I've seen cracking in Michelins with three year old DOT numbers.
  
  Like
- SPPPP on Jun 29, 2016
  
  The rubber compounds in use do vary quite a bit by tire manufacturer and by model. I think Michelin tends to use more natural rubber than some other brands, which may explain part of the tendency to crack. I actually just replaced two Michelins last year because they had sidewall cracks, even though the tread was still good and had no vibration. (This sounds exactly like what ToddAtlasF1 is describing, haha.) For what it's worth, I replaced them with the same exact model because I liked them so much in all other respects. (Michelin Primacy MXV4, now discontinued and replaced by the Premier A/S.) Michelin isn't the only tire brand I like, but it is my favorite so far.
  
  Like
- Highdesertcat on Jun 29, 2016
  
  @SPPPP " Michelin isn’t the only tire brand I like, but it is my favorite so far." Yeah, me too! I try to put them on my vehicles when it is time to replace the tires. My 2016 Tundra TRD came standard with girthy Michelins. I've never had Michelins crack on me where I live in the high desert of NM, but Goodyears and Firestones have been the worst brands for me over the past 70 years I've been on this planet, because of a number of failures. Pirelli and Yokohama have done very well for me too. But I rarely keep tires more than 3-5 years and most of the time I replace them when the tread gets down to 1/16th of an inch.
  
  Like
- VoGo on Jun 29, 2016
  
  @highdesertcat We have this in common, at least. I am a sucker for French rubber. And if I may get on my soapbox, tires are the one area you should *not* be cheap. If they are worn (or cracked), replace them with high quality tires. No sense endangering yourself or your family for a few bucks.
  
  Like
- Highdesertcat on Jun 29, 2016
  
  @VoGo http://www.michelinman.com/US/en/why-michelin/about.html
  
  Like
- Turbo_awd on Mar 30, 2018
  
  @VoGo Agree - only drive Michelin these days. We don't drive that much, but I always get highest quality Michelin tires. This doesn't mean I would throw away other tires in good shape, but when it's time for new tires, only Michelin. That might change if/when I actually get to a track sometime and look for tires that are more suited to that scenario.
  
  Like

Recent Comments

Bd2 Hyundai is, of course, not on this list as a forefront leader in ethics and accountability. Meanwhile the egg is in Toyota's face yet again.
Jkross22 This is likely my final chime in/experience with our leased CX9 as the lease is up in less than a month. We're getting 19.5- 20.0 mpg combined over the last few months. That's with the legacy 2.5T with the 6 speed auto. Not great but it is a responsive drive train and there's a fuel penalty for that I suppose. If you're thinking about picking up a used CX9, Mazda settled a lawsuit that extends the warranty of the 2.5T for another 2 years/24k miles. Double check to make sure the 2.5T model you're looking at is covered by this. This had to do with an oil consumption issue. We did test drive the CX90 with the inline 6. It was nice, but not what I was expecting in terms of sound and smoothness. As others have said, it ain't no BMW inline 6. Power was ok, but oddly not as responsive as the 2.5T. Maybe they'll get that sorted in the next couple of years. The improved mpg has to be due to the hybrid system and shutting off at stops. Lastly, Mazda's lease return process is terrible. They're good at reminding us the end is nigh, but they outsourced the inspection process to AutoVin. AutoVin noted a scratch that AutoVin said is normal wear and tear, but Mazda says (in their lease end paperwork) exceeds normal wear and tear. I took it to the nearest dealer and the manager there claimed to have no say in the return process and was unable/unwilling to assist.I called the leasing dealer and they said they couldn't help either. I called Mazda Finance and they said they would send AutoVin out again for a 2nd look, and no one has followed up to do this. In fact, it's extraordinarily difficult to get anyone at Mazda Finance to answer a call. Abysmal customer support all around. I would not lease a vehicle from Mazda again.Mazda says that they can send a final bill to us within 60 days if they determine there is anything beyond normal wear and tear. I guess I'll repair the scratch, but customers shouldn't be left guessing or getting conflicting information from the inspection company and the manufacturer. And neutering your dealers in this process is counterproductive and foolish.
MaintenanceCosts Everyone at every stage of the supply chain lies. On the one hand OEMs should be vigilant, but on the other hand this sort of thing is going to happen once in a while no matter how careful an OEM is. It's hard to know from this report whether the OEMs cited here reasonably should have known of the issue or not.The real solution is for more countries to have and enforce laws against bad labor practices. We can help with that a bit through trade agreements but in the end the countries have to make the decision themselves to do it. Xi is not going to make that decision.
ToolGuy QOTD: Which chain has the best coffee on the interstate?(Tops for me right now is the robot dispenser at Pilot - grinds your choice of better-than-average beans and brews one cup at a time. Did back-to-back comparisons last week with the QuikTrip robot and it is not as good.)
Paul Alexander If there had been no Congressional ban on this type of practice, obviously it would be okay. I allow politicians to dictate my morality.