There's an Affordable International Engine of the Year Winner, If You Can Find It

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

If you want to own one of the world’s best engines (as ranked by a panel of multi-national auto journos), you don’t necessarily have to find a higher paying job or buy a plane ticket to Europe.

Most categories at the recently announced 2016 International Engine of the Year Awards were won by high-end powerplants and European mills you won’t find in North America — except for one entry dominated by Ford.

Winning the sub 1-liter class for the fifth year in a row was Ford’s 1.0-liter EcoBoost three-cylinder, an engine available in the Fiesta and Focus, but rarely talked about on these shores. (Unless you’re TTAC’s managing editor).

That tiny mill was lauded for its technology and power-to-displacement ratio. The automaker uses the 1.0-liter EcoBoost in a slew of European models, with one in five new Ford vehicles featuring the engine last year, according to the company.

The North American take up rate? Ever so drastically less.

In a wildly unshocking move, Tesla Motors won the “green engine” category for the lineup of drivetrains offered in the Model S and X.

Other winners available to drivers on this side of the Atlantic were BMW’s 1.5-liter three-cylinder hybrid powerplant, which powers the pricey i8 sportscar, and the turbocharged 2.0-liter four-cylinder in the Mercedes-AMG CLA45 and GLA45.

Going up the displacement scale, Audi’s turbocharged 2.5-liter five-cylinder (bound for the U.S. in the 2017 RS3) grabbed a top prize, as did Porsche’s turbocharged 3.0-liter flat six.

Winner of four categories, including the top “engine of the year” spot, “performance engine” and “new engine,” was Ferrari’s 3.9-liter biturbo V8, offered in the 488 GTB. After going gaga over small-displacement motors for the past several years, the panel went with a block that has more than four holes in it.

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 50 comments
  • 05lgt 05lgt on Jun 02, 2016

    What's with the displacement obsession? Power to mass, power to required underhood volume, power per fuel; these are what matters. 1.5l + 200lbs of plumbing and 3ft3 of extra space is worse than 2.5l NA. I'm sure they design to what matters, why must media and therefore marketers obsess on displacement?

  • Maserchist Maserchist on Jun 08, 2016

    Great juxtaposition of the Pratt & Whitney engine advertisement at the very end of the comments section FWIW...

  • Corey Lewis It's not competitive against others in the class, as my review discussed. https://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/cars/chevrolet/rental-review-the-2023-chevrolet-malibu-last-domestic-midsize-standing-44502760
  • Turbo Is Black Magic My wife had one of these back in 06, did a ton of work to it… supercharger, full exhaust, full suspension.. it was a blast to drive even though it was still hilariously slow. Great for drive in nights, open the hatch fold the seats flat and just relax.Also this thing is a great example of how far we have come in crash safety even since just 2005… go look at these old crash tests now and I cringe at what a modern electric tank would do to this thing.
  • MaintenanceCosts Whenever the topic of the xB comes up…Me: "The style is fun. The combination of the box shape and the aggressive detailing is very JDM."Wife: "Those are ghetto."Me: "They're smaller than a Corolla outside and have the space of a RAV4 inside."Wife: "Those are ghetto."Me: "They're kind of fun to drive with a stick."Wife: "Those are ghetto."It's one of a few cars (including its fellow box, the Ford Flex) on which we will just never see eye to eye.
  • Oberkanone The alternative is a more expensive SUV. Yes, it will be missed.
  • Ajla I did like this one.
Next