It's a Cash Bonanza for Diesel Owners as Volkswagen Unloads Up to $14.7 Billion in the U.S.

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Christmas is coming early for owners of polluting Volkswagen TDI models now that the automaker has agreed to pay up to $14.7 billion to settle claims in the diesel emissions scandal.

Volkswagen’s settlement with the federal government, owners and regulators will see it buy back some 475,000 2.0-liter diesel vehicles in the U.S. at pre-scandal values and offer their owners up to a cool $10,000 in extra compensation, according to figures reported by the New York Times.

Cash compensation varies depending on the age and model of the vehicle, but owners won’t see a payout of less than $5,100, the report said. Owners who ditched their TDI like a hot potato after the scandal became public are still eligible for compensation, but will only receive half of what’s being offered to existing owners.

Volkswagen will also forgive vehicle loans and pay off those acquired through third parties to the tune of 130 percent of what the owner would be eligible for under the buyback. Leases can be cancelled with no termination fee.

If they want to, owners of 2009-and-newer 2.0-liter diesel models can opt to have the manufacturer fix their vehicle to keep it on the road, though there could be drawbacks to that game plan. Older models would need fairly extensive work to bring the vehicle’s emissions levels into compliance, with power and fuel economy suffering as a result.

According to the settlement, the recall rate for the fix option must meet 85 percent. The Environmental Protection Agency hasn’t approved a mechanical fix for either the 2.0-liter or 3.0-liter diesels.

The EPA stated that owners will receive notices this fall, with the first buybacks occurring in October of this year.

Reaction to the settlement by lawmakers was strongly worded, to say the least. In a release from the EPA, Deputy Attorney General Sally Q. Yates stated, “By duping the regulators, Volkswagen turned nearly half a million American drivers into unwitting accomplices in an unprecedented assault on our atmosphere.”

She added, somewhat ominously (for Volkswagen), “This partial settlement marks a significant first step towards holding Volkswagen accountable for what was a breach of its legal duties and a breach of the public’s trust. And while this announcement is an important step forward, let me be clear, it is by no means the last.”

The massive price tag attached to the settlement — one of the costliest in U.S. history, and the largest for any automaker — tops early estimates by about $4.5 billion. Of the total cost of dealing with scandal fallout in the U.S., $10.03 billion will go towards the buyback and compensation program.

On the environmental front, the rest of Volkswagen’s settlement cash will be spent on remediation programs designed to make up for the air pollution emitted by its defeat device-fitted diesels since 2009. $2.7 billion goes to the EPA to create a fund for green projects, and $2 billion will be spent by the automaker on zero-emission vehicle projects.

If it creates marketable products, that could be money well spent for Volkswagen.

While the $14.7 billion wraps up the vehicle side of the scandal in the U.S. (reputation damage will take longer to fix), criminal penalties are still on the way. It’s a good thing the automaker set aside a larger amount of cash for the task at hand. The New York Times reports that penalties totaling $500 million could land on Volkswagen this week, the result of investigations by the Justice Department and the governments of 42 states, D.C. and Puerto Rico.

In a media release, Frank Witter, Volkswagen’s chief financial officer, stated, “Today’s announcement is within the scope of our provisions and other financial liabilities that we have already disclosed, and we are in a position to manage the consequences. It provides further clarity for our U.S. customers and dealers as well as for our shareholders. Settlements of this magnitude are clearly a very significant burden for our business.”

Financial regulators in the U.S. and the governments of various countries still haven’t asked for their pounds of flesh, so costs will continue to mount. The bulk of the company’s diesels went to European consumers, meaning settlements for untold amounts of money still loom. The wildly expensive U.S. settlement could embolden governments to take Volkswagen for all it has (or all it has left).

In Germany, authorities are investigating brand chief Herbert Diess and former CEO Martin Winterkorn to find out what they knew about the emissions cheating prior to the scandal.

[Image: Frankieleon/ Flickr]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
8 of 103 comments
  • Hummer Hummer on Jun 28, 2016

    So if the recall rate only has to hit 85%, then 15% of owners may be able to keep their VW operating in current condition, that'll be an interesting vehicle to have 20 years from now.

    • See 1 previous
    • Hummer Hummer on Jun 28, 2016

      @VoGo Oh heck no, but when you walk past it in a junkyard it will at least elicit a 'huh' reaction; that's about the best you can hope for with a 20 year old VW.

  • Markf Markf on Jun 28, 2016

    "unprecedented assault on our atmosphere" good grief, hyperbole much EPA? This episode just proves how useless these regulations are, VW skirts them and no one dies, the earth is not covered in badness and our atmosphere remains assaulted.....

  • Mike-NB2 This is a mostly uninformed vote, but I'll go with the Mazda 3 too.I haven't driven a new Civic, so I can't say anything about it, but two weeks ago I had a 2023 Corolla as a rental. While I can understand why so many people buy these, I was surprised at how bad the CVT is. Many rentals I've driven have a CVT and while I know it has one and can tell, they aren't usually too bad. I'd never own a car with a CVT, but I can live with one as a rental. But the Corolla's CVT was terrible. It was like it screamed "CVT!" the whole time. On the highway with cruise control on, I could feel it adjusting to track the set speed. Passing on the highway (two-lane) was risky. The engine isn't under-powered, but the CVT makes it seem that way.A minor complaint is about the steering. It's waaaay over-assisted. At low speeds, it's like a 70s LTD with one-finger effort. Maybe that's deliberate though, given the Corolla's demographic.
  • Mike-NB2 2019 Ranger - 30,000 miles / 50,000 km. Nothing but oil changes. Original tires are being replaced a week from Wednesday. (Not all that mileage is on the original A/S tires. I put dedicated winter rims/tires on it every winter.)2024 - Golf R - 1700 miles / 2800 km. Not really broken in yet. Nothing but gas in the tank.
  • SaulTigh I've got a 2014 F150 with 87K on the clock and have spent exactly $4,180.77 in maintenance and repairs in that time. That's pretty hard to beat.Hard to say on my 2019 Mercedes, because I prepaid for three years of service (B,A,B) and am getting the last of those at the end of the month. Did just drop $1,700 on new Michelins for it at Tire Rack. Tires for the F150 late last year were under $700, so I'd say the Benz is roughly 2 to 3 times as pricy for anything over the Ford.I have the F150 serviced at a large independent shop, the Benz at the dealership.
  • Bike Rather have a union negotiating my pay rises with inflation at the moment.
  • Bike Poor Redapple won't be sitting down for a while after opening that can of Whiparse
Next