Roll With It: FCA Voluntarily Recalls 1.1 Million Models With Confusing Gear Selector

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Like an unoccupied Dodge Charger stuck in “Drive,” Fiat Chrysler Automobiles’ gear selector controversy was rapidly building momentum before yesterday’s announcement.

Responding to numerous instances of runaway vehicles and an expanding National Highway Traffic Safety Administration investigation, FCA voluntarily recalled 811,586 vehicles in the U.S. and 52,144 in Canada, and a further 265,473 in Mexico and overseas.

The recalled models — certain 2012-2014 Dodge Chargers and Chrysler 300s, and 2014-2015 Jeep Grand Cherokees — were equipped with the company’s eight-speed automatic transmission and featured a gear selector that bewildered many owners. Some drivers exited their vehicles after mistakenly believing the selector was in “Park,” leading to 41 known injuries.

In a statement, FCA said the accidents were due to driver error, and emphasized that the gear selectors — though confusing — functioned as designed:

The vehicles affected by this recall are equipped with electronic shift levers that return to the same position after each manipulation. Gear-selection is conveyed to the driver by multiple sets of indicator lights, not gear-selector position, and unless due care is taken, drivers may draw erroneous conclusions about the status of their vehicles.

The automaker stopped using the gear selector after complaints piled up. The NHTSA began investigating those complaints last summer.

FCA said a warning chime sounds when the affected vehicle’s engine is running, the driver’s side door is ajar and the gear selector is out of Park, but that warning will be upgraded.

Other safety measures are planned, though the automaker remains vague on exactly what the fix will be. In their words, “The enhancements will combine warnings with a transmission-shift strategy to automatically prevent a vehicle from moving, under certain circumstances, even if the driver fails to select “PARK.”

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 91 comments
  • Dukeisduke Dukeisduke on Apr 26, 2016

    "In a statement, FCA said the accidents were due to driver error, and emphasized that the gear selectors — though confusing — functioned as designed:" Blaming the owners? Sergio Marchionne is a jerk.

  • Pwrwrench Pwrwrench on May 20, 2016

    The "Shifter for Automatic Transmission" has a long history of problems. I'm just old enough to remember the PNDLR on the column, I think those were GMs. Apparently there was a detent to get into Reverse, pull back on the lever, but it was subject to wear. A significant number of drivers got R when they wanted D or L. The results were sometimes bad. Next one I recall was the Ford Reverse detent failure of the 1970s. Many cars slid out of P into R due to wear, vibration, and overall bad design of the mechanism. Again more bad endings. Then came the Audi 5000 "unintended acceleration"/"pedal misapplication". Out of that came the interlock between the brake and the shift lever. Could not shift out of Park without stepping on the brake. Next there was the system to prevent removal of the ignition key unless the shifter was in P. Most, if not all, cars and trucks with these devices had a method to bypass them if something failed so the car could be driven, but what happened when someone with no knowledge of this (and the owners manual is long gone) was stuck somewhere? Now we have cars without any keys so all these 'safety' systems are handled electronically. Of course, those systems NEVER have problems. I have not seen anything with the shifter described here. From what some have written there may not be a mechanical Parking Brake on some of these vehicles. This all seems lot a lot of trouble just waiting to happen. Anyone that leaves a vehicle without setting the Parking Brake (the lever or pedal that actuates some of the brake system) deserves what they get. I recall hearing, on a call in radio show, from someone that wanted to know if he could sue the car manufacturer because on the vehicle in question, from the 80s, the key could be removed without the shifter being in Park. According to the caller, the car, on two different occasions, rolled away and crashed into things when he left it. I stand with my statement about using the Parking Brake. And car makers that have these bizarre electronic shifters are asking for trouble.

  • Probert They already have hybrids, but these won't ever be them as they are built on the modular E-GMP skateboard.
  • Justin You guys still looking for that sportbak? I just saw one on the Facebook marketplace in Arizona
  • 28-Cars-Later I cannot remember what happens now, but there are whiteblocks in this period which develop a "tick" like sound which indicates they are toast (maybe head gasket?). Ten or so years ago I looked at an '03 or '04 S60 (I forget why) and I brought my Volvo indy along to tell me if it was worth my time - it ticked and that's when I learned this. This XC90 is probably worth about $300 as it sits, not kidding, and it will cost you conservatively $2500 for an engine swap (all the ones I see on car-part.com have north of 130K miles starting at $1,100 and that's not including freight to a shop, shop labor, other internals to do such as timing belt while engine out etc).
  • 28-Cars-Later Ford reported it lost $132,000 for each of its 10,000 electric vehicles sold in the first quarter of 2024, according to CNN. The sales were down 20 percent from the first quarter of 2023 and would “drag down earnings for the company overall.”The losses include “hundreds of millions being spent on research and development of the next generation of EVs for Ford. Those investments are years away from paying off.” [if they ever are recouped] Ford is the only major carmaker breaking out EV numbers by themselves. But other marques likely suffer similar losses. https://www.zerohedge.com/political/fords-120000-loss-vehicle-shows-california-ev-goals-are-impossible Given these facts, how did Tesla ever produce anything in volume let alone profit?
  • AZFelix Let's forego all of this dilly-dallying with autonomous cars and cut right to the chase and the only real solution.
Next