'Defeat Device' PowerPoint Presentation is Volkswagen's Latest Embarrassment

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

If you want your nefarious plan to stay on the down low, try not to make a PowerPoint presentation on it.

That’s an obvious takeaway from the New York Times report that details a bombshell discovery made by investigators probing documents and laptops related to Volkswagen’s diesel emissions scandal.

It’s already known that Audi designed the infamous “defeat device” at the heart of the scandal back in 1999, and that Volkswagen waited six years before deciding to use it.

But corporate culture being what it is, company representatives needed some pointers on the illicit technology. And thus, the incriminating PowerPoint was born.

The New York Times report, drawn from two sources who viewed the document, says the PowerPoint presentation was crafted by a senior technology executive in 2006, after the company made the decision to use the defeat device in its new “clean diesels”:

Just a few pages long, the 2006 presentation included a graph that explained the process for testing the amount of pollution spewing from a car. In a laboratory, regulators would try to replicate a variety of conditions on the road.

The pattern of those tests, the presentation said, was entirely predictable. And a piece of code embedded in the software that controlled the engine could recognize that pattern, activating equipment to reduce emissions just for testing purposes.

The technology was subsequently refined to recognize other signs of regulatory testing, according to hacker Felix Domke, who analyzed the software with the finest of combs.

Volkswagen and its executives failed to respond to requests for comment from the newspaper. The report doesn’t name the PowerPoint’s creator, and the question of who saw the presentation remains unanswered.

It’s possible some Volkswagen heads are still due for the chopping block, but the company has already paid an astronomical price for its consumer deception.

Besides sales that resemble a jetliner’s trajectory following a double bird strike, the company has carved out $18.2 billion from its struggling operation to fund last week’s settlement with U.S. consumers and regulators.

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
8 of 91 comments
  • VoGo VoGo on Apr 27, 2016

    The B&B loves to criticize the NYT, but you see, this is what they do. Actual journalism. Journalism may be a dying industry, but some of us still believe that an informed voter is essential for democracy.

    • See 5 previous
    • ToddAtlasF1 ToddAtlasF1 on Apr 29, 2016

      @Lou_BC Do you even know who Bernie Sanders is? Do you know who Vince Foster was? Do you know who Paula Jones, Juanita Broaddrick, and Kathleen Willey are? Do you know what Whitewater was? Do you know what Hillary Care was, or about Hillary's midas touch in the stock market? Do you know about the Clintons having to return the $200K in furniture they stole last time they vacated the White House, or the $80K in damages they had to reimburse the US for after they looted? Do you know about Hillary being fired from the Watergate commission, or about her laughing about a child rape victim she crucified on the stand years after the fact on tape? The media takes advantage of willful ignoramuses like you by reporting only what furthers their statist agenda. Your lack of character makes you easy prey for propagandists. You seem proud of how malleable you are for the people that will strip your rights. Pitiful.

  • Robert.Walter Robert.Walter on Apr 28, 2016

    Rogue engineers Piëch and Wintercorn, sitting in a tree, Set the tone years ago, For all we now see...

  • Zipper69 "At least Lincoln finally learned to do a better job of not appearing to have raided the Ford parts bin"But they differentiate by being bland and unadventurous and lacking a clear brand image.
  • Zipper69 "The worry is that vehicles could collect and share Americans' data with the Chinese government"Presumably, via your cellphone connection? Does the average Joe in the gig economy really have "data" that will change the balance of power?
  • Zipper69 Honda seem to have a comprehensive range of sedans that sell well.
  • Oberkanone How long do I have to stay in this job before I get a golden parachute?I'd lower the price of the V-Series models. Improve the quality of interiors across the entire line. I'd add a sedan larger then CT5. I'd require a financial review of Celestiq. If it's not a profit center it's gone. Styling updates in the vision of the XLR to existing models. 2+2 sports coupe woutd be added. Performance in the class of AMG GT and Porsche 911 at a price just under $100k. EV models would NOT be subsidized by ICE revenue.
  • NJRide Let Cadillac be Cadillac, but in the context of 2024. As a new XT5 owner (the Emerald Green got me to buy an old design) I would have happy preferred a Lyriq hybrid. Some who really like the Lyriq's package but don't want an EV will buy another model. Most will go elsewhere. I love the V6 and good but easy to use infotainment. But I know my next car will probably be more electrified w more tech.I don't think anyone is confusing my car for a Blazer but i agree the XT6 is too derivative. Frankly the Enclave looks more prestigious. The Escalade still has got it, though I would love to see the ESV make a comeback. I still think GM missed the boat by not making a Colorado based mini-Blazer and Escalade. I don't get the 2 sedans. I feel a slightly larger and more distinctly Cadillac sedan would sell better. They also need to advertise beyond the Lyriq. I don't feel other luxury players are exactly hitting it out of the park right now so a strengthened Cadillac could regain share.
Next