Piston Slap: The Cat's Meow for OEM or Aftermarket Parts?

Sajeev Mehta
by Sajeev Mehta

John writes:

I recently had a local shop confirm the need for O2 sensors in my Jaguar S-Type. With 97,000 miles on them, it seems very likely they need replacement, and the mechanic wants to install factory sensors at the cost of some $650 for the parts. I can purchase Denso or Bosch from the local parts store for less than $200. As these parts were originally designed to last at least 80,000 miles (Federal warranty requirement), I figure that replacements from any reputable source will last quite a long time.

What is your opinion as to brand specific parts versus more generic replacement parts?

I suspect the original supplier was actually Bosch anyway so in my mind they are the same.

Sajeev answers:

Your last sentence is my usual go-to statement, especially as cars depreciate to the age of any Jaguar S-Type. I still remember cringing when my trusted mechanic, some 15+ years ago, said my father’s Mark VIII’s (not the one I currently own) intermittent fuel smell was from leaky injectors. The replacement injectors cost $800, and they were a unique part number with no aftermarket alternative.

Perhaps that’s what he thought since it was the first Ford with that particular engine, but it was all bullshit: all Fords with that engine use the same 24 lb-hr injectors. I grabbed my Ford Motorsport catalog and ordered a set for $275-ish, delivered to the shop, and crossed my fingers for a seamless install. Thank goodness I was right.

Back to the “value” of factory vs. aftermarket parts on a heavily depreciated motor: it really depends. Factory body parts? Yes. In this case? No, get Bosch O2 sensors and pocket the extra cash.

Forget about the price, odds are they are the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) anyway. Sometimes you’ll even get a factory part when buying the “aftermarket” brand: happened to me when purchasing TRW control arms and several HVAC parts. And it’s nice to see those factory castings, part numbers or packaging when you’d never pay for them. It’s kinda like poppin’ tags, sort of.

When do you buy OEM bits, Best and Brightest?

[Image: Jaguar]

Send your queries to sajeev@thetruthaboutcars.com. Spare no details and ask for a speedy resolution if you’re in a hurry…but be realistic, and use your make/model specific forums instead of TTAC for more timely advice.

Sajeev Mehta
Sajeev Mehta

More by Sajeev Mehta

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 42 comments
  • Kyree Kyree on Mar 22, 2016

    Plus, it's Bosch. It's not some no-name outfit you've never heard of (which, itself, probably wouldn't be the end of the world). Buy them.

    • Jagboi Jagboi on Mar 22, 2016

      Never had a problem with NTK, I have with Bosch.

  • Gearhead77 Gearhead77 on Mar 22, 2016

    My Mazda 5 had quite a few suspension issues early on. I replaced all the Mazda stuff that had issues with non OEM stuff. No problems in the 25k since most of the work done, on PA's awful roads with mostly city driving. I've found that every so often, the OEM stuff is the best bet. The rear wiper on the Mazda 5 is a Mazda only part, all the aftermarket blades don't work well, leaving a large area uncleared. It's worth the $20 every two years for the properly functioning part.

  • Teddyc73 Oh look dull grey with black wheels. How original.
  • Teddyc73 "Matte paint looks good on this car." No it doesn't. It doesn't look good on any car. From the Nissan Versa I rented all the up to this monstrosity. This paint trend needs to die before out roads are awash with grey vehicles with black wheels. Why are people such lemmings lacking in individuality? Come on people, embrace color.
  • Flashindapan Will I miss the Malibu, no. Will I miss one less midsize sedan that’s comfortable, reliable and reasonably priced, yes.
  • Theflyersfan I used to love the 7-series. One of those aspirational luxury cars. And then I parked right next to one of the new ones just over the weekend. And that love went away. Honestly, if this is what the Chinese market thinks is luxury, let them have it. Because, and I'll be reserved here, this is one butt-ugly, mutha f'n, unholy trainwreck of a design. There has to be an excellent car under all of the grotesque and overdone bodywork. What were they thinking? Luxury is a feeling. It's the soft leather seats. It's the solid door thunk. It's groundbreaking engineering (that hopefully holds up.) It's a presence that oozes "I have arrived," not screaming "LOOK AT ME EVERYONE!!!" The latter is the yahoo who just won $1,000,000 off of a scratch-off and blows it on extra chrome and a dozen light bars on a new F150. It isn't six feet of screens, a dozen suspension settings that don't feel right, and no steering feel. It also isn't a design that is going to be so dated looking in five years that no one is going to want to touch it. Didn't BMW learn anything from the Bangle-butt backlash of 2002?
  • Theflyersfan Honda, Toyota, Nissan, Hyundai, and Kia still don't seem to have a problem moving sedans off of the lot. I also see more than a few new 3-series, C-classes and A4s as well showing the Germans can sell the expensive ones. Sales might be down compared to 10-15 years ago, but hundreds of thousands of sales in the US alone isn't anything to sneeze at. What we've had is the thinning of the herd. The crap sedans have exited stage left. And GM has let the Malibu sit and rot on the vine for so long that this was bound to happen. And it bears repeating - auto trends go in cycles. Many times the cars purchased by the next generation aren't the ones their parents and grandparents bought. Who's to say that in 10 years, CUVs are going to be seen at that generation's minivans and no one wants to touch them? The Japanese and Koreans will welcome those buyers back to their full lineups while GM, Ford, and whatever remains of what was Chrysler/Dodge will be back in front of Congress pleading poverty.
Next