Not So Fast With That Lawsuit, Guys: Volkswagen

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

An anticipated multi-billion dollar lawsuit from disgruntled Volkswagen shareholders is without merit, the embattled German automaker said on March 2.

A document made public by Volkswagen states that the suit, which alleges a violation of disclosure obligations under capital markets law, is doomed to fail following an examination by legal experts from both inside and outside of the company.

News of the shareholder lawsuit emerged in mid-January after Volkswagen stocks tumbled precipitously in the wake of the diesel emissions scandal that engulfed the automaker last September. Reportedly, thousands of investors were lined up to demand a pound — or several — of Volkswagen’s warm, soft flesh.

The document asserts that while Volkswagen feels it is in the clear (on this charge, at least), an outside law firm will tackle the thorny legal matter of the emissions defeat device installed in its diesel vehicles for the past several years. It also included another official apology, something that has now become standard daily practice in Wolfsburg:

The Company emphasizes that this examination does not replace the independent investigation for the complete clarification of the diesel matter which is being conducted by the law firm Jones Day and is ongoing. The Company is making this public announcement to correct the selective and incomplete publication of documents in the media about the diesel matter and to avoid having partial excerpts of its statement of defense published in the media. Notwithstanding this, Volkswagen deeply regrets the incidents related to the diesel issue.

In order for Volkswagen to be be liable for financial losses under such a lawsuit, the company would have to have had prior knowledge of facts that were relevant to the stock price.

Volkswagen claims they were as shocked as anyone when word reached them of the Environmental Protection Agency’s allegations of violation of federal emissions laws on Sept. 18, 2015.

Until that point, Volkswagen argues “there were no indications whatsoever of information with relevance for the stock price,” given that they were already anticipating a recall of a half-million vehicles and significantly lower associated fines.

As the controversy continues its slow plod forward — and its sales continue their fast slide downward — Volkswagen says they’ll release the preliminary findings of their own investigation in the second half of April.

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 16 comments
  • Voyager Voyager on Mar 03, 2016

    Hmm, the day before yesterday the BBC reported that CEO Winterkorn knew about the fraudulent software long before he said he did.

    • Voyager Voyager on Mar 03, 2016

      VW traces the scandal back to 2005, when it decided to launch diesel engines in the US. http://www.autocar.co.uk/car-news/industry/vw-emissions-scandal-vw-knew-defeat-device-may-2014 VW says that after internal and external legal examinations it “confirms its belief that its management board duly fulfilled its disclosure obligation under German capital markets law”. As such, VW believes that lawsuits from shareholders to be “without merit, since any ad hoc disclosure obligation requires that the persons responsible for the fulfillment of this obligation obtain knowledge of facts relevant for the stock price and can assess the economic effects of those facts”. That sounds like erecting a building using materials of which the real estate co. knows that they will not pass examination by authorities, and selling it off to investors. I would not go as far as stating that VW's arguments sound very much like the typical German excuse, used after WW2, "Wir haben es nicht gewusst"... (while they in fact did). But it is painfully close. If German prosecutors don't intend to go after VW managers like Winterkorn, the American Justice Dept. should.

  • Sobro Sobro on Mar 03, 2016

    It's the Sergeant Schultz defense. Fitting.

  • NJRide Let Cadillac be Cadillac, but in the context of 2024. As a new XT5 owner (the Emerald Green got me to buy an old design) I would have happy preferred a Lyriq hybrid. Some who really like the Lyriq's package but don't want an EV will buy another model. Most will go elsewhere. I love the V6 and good but easy to use infotainment. But I know my next car will probably be more electrified w more tech.I don't think anyone is confusing my car for a Blazer but i agree the XT6 is too derivative. Frankly the Enclave looks more prestigious. The Escalade still has got it, though I would love to see the ESV make a comeback. I still think GM missed the boat by not making a Colorado based mini-Blazer and Escalade. I don't get the 2 sedans. I feel a slightly larger and more distinctly Cadillac sedan would sell better. They also need to advertise beyond the Lyriq. I don't feel other luxury players are exactly hitting it out of the park right now so a strengthened Cadillac could regain share.
  • CM Korecko Cadillacs traditionally have been opulent, brash and leaders in the field; the "Standard of the World".That said, here's how to fix the brand:[list=1][*]Forget German luxury cars ever existed.[/*][*]Get rid of the astromech droid names and bring back Seville, Deville, Eldorado, Fleetwood and Brougham.[/*][*]End the electric crap altogether and make huge, gas guzzling land yachts for the significant portion of the population that would fight for a chance to buy one.[/*][*]Stop making sports cars and make true luxury cars for those of us who don't give a damn about the environment and are willing to swim upstream to get what we really want.[/*][*]Stop messing around with technology and make well-made and luxurious interiors.[/*][*]Watch sales skyrocket as a truly different product distinguishes itself to the delight of the target market and the damnation of the Sierra Club. Hell, there is no such thing as bad publicity and the "bad guy" image would actually have a lot of appeal.[/*][/list=1]
  • FreedMike Not surprisingly, I have some ideas. What Cadillac needs, I think, is a statement. They don’t really have an identity. They’re trying a statement car with the Celestiq, and while that’s the right idea, it has the wrong styling and a really wrong price tag. So, here’s a first step: instead of a sedan, do a huge, fast, capable and ridiculously smooth and quiet electric touring coupe. If you want an example of what I’m thinking of, check out the magnificent Rolls-Royce Spectre. But this Cadillac coupe would be uniquely American, it’d be named “Eldorado,” and it’d be a lot cheaper than the $450,000 Spectre – call it a buck twenty-five, with a range of bespoke options for prospective buyers that would make each one somewhat unique. Make it 220 inches long, on the same platform as the Celestiq, give it retro ‘60s styling (or you could do a ‘50s or ‘70s throwback, I suppose), and at least 700 horsepower, standard. Why electric? It’s the ultimate throwback to ‘60s powertrains: effortlessly fast, smooth, and quiet, but with a ton more horsepower. It’s the perfect drivetrain for a dignified touring coupe. In fact, I’d skip any mention of environmental responsibility in this car’s marketing – sell it on how it drives, period.  How many would they sell? Not many. But the point of the exercise is to do something that will turn heads and show people what this brand can do.  Second step: give the lineup a mix of electric and gas models, and make Cadillac gas engines bespoke to the brand. If they need to use generic GM engine designs, fine – take those engines and massage them thoroughly into something special to Cadillac, with specific tuning and output. No Cadillac should leave the factory with an engine straight out of a Malibu or a four-banger Silverado. Third step: a complete line-wide interior redo. Stop the cheapness that’s all over the current sedans and crossovers. Just stop it. Use the Lyriq as a blueprint – it’s a big improvement over the current crop and a good first step. I’d also say Cadillac has a good blend of screen-controlled and switch-controlled user interfaces; don’t give into the haptic-touch and wall-to-wall screen thing. (On the subject of Caddy interiors – as much as I bag on the Celestiq, check out the interior on that thing. Wow.)Fourth step: Blackwing All The Things – some gas, others electric. And keep the electric/gas mix so buyers have a choice.Fifth step: be patient. That’s not easy, but if they’re doing a brand reset, it’ll take time. 
  • NJRide So if GM was serious about selling this why no updates for so long? Or make something truly unique instead of something that looked like a downmarket Altima?
  • Kmars2009 I rented one last fall while visiting Ohio. Not a bad car...but not a great car either. I think it needs a new version. But CUVs are King... unfortunately!
Next