Here Are The North American Car and Truck/Utility of the Year Finalists, Let's Make a Bet

Aaron Cole
by Aaron Cole

The North American Car and Truck/Utility of the Year finalists were announced Tuesday and clearly the jurors read our September handicap — and completely mostly disregarded our odds.

According to jurors, the finalists for 2016 North American Car of the Year are the Honda Civic, Chevrolet Malibu and Mazda MX-5 Miata. The finalists for the 2016 Truck/Utility of the Year are the Volvo XC90, Nissan Titan XD and Honda Pilot. The winners will be announced at the North American International Auto Show in January.

Let’s review the finalists and definitively state in each capsule why that car will absolutely win:

Car of the Year

Honda Civic (1 to 3)

Clearly the winner here considering one of the nominees only seats two people and the other is something called a “Malibu.”

Have you seen the last generation Civic? The 2016 Honda Civic adds a turbonator and Apple technology over last year and that’s just the start.

Do you want more? How about a coupe or something sporty, you say? Honda has a Civic for that, smart guy, and you can fit people in the back. Try sticking your friends in the trunk of a Miata.

Jurors would be stupid not to pick the Honda Civic.

Chevrolet Malibu (1 to 3)

How many two-time car of the year champions can you name? I’ll tell you how many — one. The Chevrolet Malibu is the two-time car of the year champion you can name because that’s how many times it’ll be car of the year after 2016.

The 2008 winner is a heavyweight in this division because it’s so good that it practically makes the Impala redundant.

This year’s Malibu looks like a champ and is priced like one too. It starts at $22,500, which isn’t much more than the Honda Civic, but the Malibu is big enough to host Christmas dinner. You could probably fit the Mazda MX-5 in its trunk.

Jurors would be stupid not to pick the Chevrolet Malibu.

Mazda MX-5 Miata (1 to 3)

The MX-5 Miata is so good that it could be two cars and still sell.

Mazda’s two-seater convertible is the clear winner simply because it’s so simple. Notice how hard the Civic is trying on its styling? The MX-5 doesn’t need that. It very clearly has epic sports car proportions.

What is that roof line on the Malibu? You know what’s better than that roof line? How about 90,000 feet of sky. That’s better than your roof line, Jack.

Who cares that the power outlet is hidden in the floor? This is the North American car of the year — not appliance of the year.

Jurors would be stupid not to pick the Mazda MX-5 Miata.

Truck/Utility of the Year

Honda Pilot (1 to 3)

It says “Utility of the Year” on the award, right? What’s more utility than a Team Bus?

Honda’s new Pilot is so helpful and big you could fit the entire jury in there and still get more than 20 mpg.

Three-row SUVs win utility of the year all the time because everyone needs three-rows when you start having kids because each kid requires 250 pounds of crap. Can the XC90 seat 8? Probably not. The Titan XD can, but you’d have to stack them in the bed and that’s illegal, I think.

Jurors would be stupid not to pick the Honda Pilot.

Volvo XC90 (1 to 3)

The XC90 is basically from the future. It should be the 2016, 2017 and 2018 Utility of the Year because it’s that good. It drives itself, you know.

Have you seen the XC90’s Sensus infotainment system? I’m pretty sure it was in “Minority Report,” and it was just upgraded with Apple CarPlay because Volvo is magic.

It doesn’t swill dirty diesel fuel like the Titan XD (not in the States, anyway) and the XC90 doesn’t look like a bloated minivan like someone else I’ve seen recently.

Jurors would be stupid not to pick the Volvo XC90.

Nissan Titan XD (1 to 3)

A truck of the year is supposed to be a truck, right? Do you see any other trucks here besides the Nissan Titan XD?

The Nissan Titan XD is such a good truck that it made its own classification in trucks for itself. Didn’t think you needed a medium-duty diesel? Guess again.

Can that Honda Pilot rip a stump from the earth? Probably not. Would you get that Volvo XC90 in anything deeper than a backyard slip-n-slide? Nope.

The Nissan Titan XD is the truck of the year because it probably has a hairy chest.

Jurors would be stupid not to pick the Nissan Titan XD.

Aaron Cole
Aaron Cole

More by Aaron Cole

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 51 comments
  • Carlson Fan Carlson Fan on Dec 09, 2015

    Forget the Malibu, the 2nd Gen 2016 Chevy Volt should be car of the year. Nothing else even comes close.

    • Kyree Kyree on Dec 09, 2015

      Yeah, I don't know how that didn't get nominated. It might be because it's only being released in limited markets, for now. Either way, with the new Malibu, Cruze, Volt and Camaro, 2016 is a huge year for Chevrolet.

  • MeJ MeJ on Dec 09, 2015

    I'll throw in my vote. Car: Miata. The last of a dying breed. Small, tossable, affordable, dependable (I'm sure there are a few more '-ables', but I can't think of them off the top of my head.)and good looking. What's not to like? Truck: Titan. Why not? Preliminary reviews are good and it would be nice to see a different truck other than a Ford, GM, or Dodge, win.

    • VolandoBajo VolandoBajo on Dec 10, 2015

      Miata: another -able (at least in its first incarnation)...weak-sauce-able powertrain. IIRC, its zero-sixty times were in the double digits when it came out. Slower than my eighteen year old 4000 lb. Panther. And even if not, way too slow for a two seat sports car. Might have outrun a Sprite, but not much else from the golden era of British sports cars.

  • Redapple2 Gen 1 - 8/10 on cool scale.Gen 2 - 3/10.
  • SCE to AUX "...to help bolster job growth and the local economy"An easy win for the politicians - the details won't matter.
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh so now we will PAY them your tax money to build crappy cars in the states ..
  • SCE to AUX Yes, I'll miss it, and it doesn't make sense to kill off your 3rd-best seller. 2023 was its best year since 2018.
  • SCE to AUX This was the same car I had (05 xB, stick, "camouflage" color) for 7 years - great car.We called ours "The Lunchbox". I added aftermarket wheels, and the 3rd-party cruise control the dealers could install.It suffered only two failures: bad window switch in week 2 (dealer fixed in 1 hour), bad trailing O2 sensor (fixed myself for $70). Fuel economy was always 28-34 mpg.It was a potential death trap, and ride quality became unbearable after 2 hours. I once did a 10-hour round trip in it and could barely walk after.Traded it for a 2012 Leaf, which was a better car in some ways.
Next