Junkyard Find: 1987 Saab 900S

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

About five years ago, the Saab 900 was a relatively common sight in American self-service wrecking yards, but now examples of this Saab 99 descendant are getting rare.

Here’s a non-turbo 900S that I spotted not long ago in a Denver yard.

Almost 200,000 miles, but this Swedish steel will go to The Crusher just 1,390 miles short of that milestone. A weekend road trip from Denver to Des Moines and back would have done the trick.

The interior has some sun-bleaching, but looks good for a 28-year-old car.

The naturally aspirated 16-valve four-cylinder engine in this car made 125 horsepower, which was pretty good for an engine based on the Triumph Slant-4, of TR7 fame.

Of course, Saab had made many improvements to the engine design since the British Leyland days.

How many of us have been burned by a junkyard radio that needs an unobtainable security code to function?

Not rusty, not smashed. Maybe this car developed some expensive mechanical problem (i.e., any mechanical problem) that wasn’t worth fixing, or maybe it was a trade-in that no dealer could sell.

Here’s the complete Saab lineup for 1987 or 1988, including the Viggen airplane (which went out of production a few years later).

Does Geely make jets? HELL NO.






Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 69 comments
  • Kmars2009 Kmars2009 on Nov 24, 2015

    SAAB began it's slow decline once GM took over in the 90's. Switching everything to GM platforms and parts resulted in simply a restyled Malibu...with equal poor GM quality. Then when times got tough, GM killed them off. Probably a good thing. Who wanted to pay a premium price for a redone Malibu? Certainly not a premium car shopper!

    • See 1 previous
    • Dave M. Dave M. on Nov 27, 2015

      @krhodes1 Great analysis and very true - much to my dismay, GM extended Saab's life for at least 10 years. You're right though - in all their internal troubles GM did starve Saab of new product...until it was too late. I love my '04 9-3 Aero convertible, but no way would I count on it as a daily driver. Parts and repairs are expensive with limited availability of parts and knowledgeable mechanics, but no worse than a typical European car. Here's a great read.... http://www.steadysaabin.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Who-killed-Saab-Automobile.pdf

  • Kmars2009 Kmars2009 on Nov 29, 2015

    I would rather SAAB die with some dignity, than part of the GM junkpile. They almost killed Suzuki too, fortunately, after GM ruined their reputation and sales here...they chose to back out. Saving their lives. Anyway...RIP SAAB!

  • Redapple2 Used to watch F 1 a great deal. Now? F1 Random thoughts:1 Silly rules bug me. Must use 2 types of tire. Cant refuel. Drag reduction can only be used in certain areas of the track and only if you are so close to the car in front.2 Passing is rare. Pole sitter wins a high % of the time.3 A new team can only start in F1 if they get the blessing of the overlords. Evil gm Vampire was barred. How about this. Anybody with a car that meets the construction rules can try. If your speed qualifies and you pay the entry fee. You re in. So is anybody else. 4 I tune in for Martin Brundle's grid walk. In my life, it s must see tv. But he is often bumped or cancelled. Grid walk takes place 1 out of 3 or 4 races.5 So, because of this utter bull sheet and other points, I ve migrated to IMSA and MotoGP. I might catch a summary on the youtube.
  • Redapple2 I retract my comments and apologize.
  • Flashindapan I always thought these look nice. I was working at a Land Rover dealership at the time the LR3 came out and we were all impressed how much better it was then the Discovery in just about every measurable way.
  • Bd2 If I were going to spend $ on a ticking time bomb, it wouldn't be for an LR4 (the least interesting of Land Rovers).
  • Spectator Wild to me the US sent like $100B overseas for other peoples wars while we clammer over .1% of that money being used to promote EVs in our country.
Next