Hyundai Group Riding High Amid Russian Economic Maelstrom

Cameron Aubernon
by Cameron Aubernon

As Russia continues to struggle with its economic health, Hyundai Group is doing its part to keep the nation’s auto sales afloat.

According to a representative, “Russia is one of the major and important markets for Hyundai (Group),” Ward’s Auto reports. The group’s Hyundai and Kia brands hold a combined 19.9 percent of the nation’s automotive market in Q1 2015, with Hyundai holding 10.4 percent and Kia 9.5 percent.

Despite the maelstrom sweeping through the market, Hyundai Group has managed to fare well against the economic storm compared to other automakers. Analysts and industry-watchers suggest this is due to factors such as proper product placement, a beneficial global strategy, and its ability to play the game driving Russia’s auto industry.

The group also took home the gold in deliveries over the recent quarter, moving a combined 75,871 vehicles out of the showroom. Local automaker AvtoVAZ pulled up in second with 68,554 in the same period, while Renault-Nissan took bronze with 65,657 combined deliveries. Meanwhile, BMW is reconsidering plans to build a factory in Russia, and General Motors is shutting down local production and withdrawing its Chevrolet and Opel brands from the market.

Within the group, the Kia Rio has done wonders for the bottom line, especially for the Kia brand. Produced locally at the Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Russia facility in St. Petersburg, the Rio accounted for 44 percent of overall production — 104,700 units — and 48 percent of all the brand’s sales in the market during 2014.

Though the country’s economic woes are expected to worsen in 2015, a Kia representative says market share for the brand is likely to continue trending upward, having gone from 7.1 percent in 2013 to 7.9 percent last year; current projections through February 2015 point to a 9.8-percent share by the end of the year. Hyundai remains mum on yearly forecasts, but believes it will continue to fare well, also, thanks in part to government incentives for both consumers and the industry as a whole.

[Photo credit: Kia]

Cameron Aubernon
Cameron Aubernon

Seattle-based writer, blogger, and photographer for many a publication. Born in Louisville. Raised in Kansas. Where I lay my head is home.

More by Cameron Aubernon

Comments
Join the conversation
10 of 11 comments
  • Sjalabais Sjalabais on May 14, 2015

    So how do they make money while others don't? Renault-Nissan has local factories, and I thought GM had, too? That partially offsets the trouble with the rouble, but why would just one conglomerate know how to navigate these seas?

    • See 4 previous
    • Sjalabais Sjalabais on May 15, 2015

      @ect It's probably just a Wikipedia article away, but with GM still making the Opel Kadett/Pontiac LeMans under the Daewoo brand in Aserbajdsjan, I just assumed they'd do something similar in Russia, too...

  • Onus Onus on May 15, 2015

    Hyundai and Kia are very aggressive on pricing here. I currently have the new Kia Rio ( Chinese model is the one sold here ) advertised for 535,000 руб. Whereas the the Hyundai Solaris ( accent ) looks to be for sale for 10,000 руб. less. If you compare this to lada and Renault / Nissan they cost about 100,000 more. But are still quite affordable. I could see a Russian having no problem spending slightly more for better perceived value. The ruble also had been gaining traction and it's value add risen quite dramatically. Just yesterday it dropped below 50 Rub per USD.

    • See 2 previous
    • Sjalabais Sjalabais on May 15, 2015

      @Onus I think the Niva would be the easiest to keep alive - and eventually to sell, too. 469's do not have the...eh...strong reputation of the competing Lada. But I love the Bukhanka's myself - they are still sold new as military vehicles in the Czech Republic; thus earning a valuable EU certificate. Pretty impressive offroad package. Are you an American in Russia? When will you go back?

  • Eric Or that one!!
  • YellowDuck I'd actually welcome an on-dash warning when I am 15 km/h over. Where I live the city has gone nuts installing 30 km/h zones (18 mph!) all over the damn place, sometimes accompanied by speed cameras. One week there was construction on my normal route, and the detour took me through a 30 km/h zone. Two days in a row I drove through there at what seemed like a responsible speed (under 50) because I didn't notice the sign. A week later, and a week + 1 day later, I received speeding tickets in the mail, totalling over $400. Maybe I'm getting old, but I wouldn't mind my car letting me know when I am making a mistake like that.
  • Carson D What supporters of this policy don't understand or pretend that they don't understand, is that the people who aren't elites who drive in the city do it because their livelihoods depend on it, or because they are taking a road trip to or from their overpriced cave, or because they are visiting family, and the family car is the most economical or only option. There are also middle-class people who come in on the weekend from the outer boroughs to shop in China Town, or to pick up elderly family members and drive them to their doctors. The people who will have their lives diminished by this are the sort of people who work for a living, care about their families, and support local businesses. I understand why the left hates them, since the bourgeoisie has always been the sworn enemy of the Marxist authoritarian.
  • YellowDuck Edits needed...first mention it was a Challenger...which didn't jive with the photos...
  • Srd275 let’s see the officials help cause congestion by not improving infrastructure (mass transit doesn’t. Move goods or services and does not move commuters that well). Then charge a toll for the gridlock they created. tar and feather the tax and spend officials????
Next