PSA CEO Varin Says French Carmaker to Deepen Ties With Dongfeng in China. GM's Girsky Unconcerned

TTAC Staff
by TTAC Staff

PSA/Peugeot-Citroen is negotiating with China’s Dongfeng Motor to expand their partnership in the world’s largest car market. PSA CEO Philippe Varin told reporters attending the opening of a new factory in Shenzhen, China, on Saturday that the French company is seriously considering selling equity to Dongfeng to fund expansion outside of Europe. The sale could diminish the holdings of the Peugeot family, which holds slightly more than a quarter of PSA shares, below a controlling stake in the French automaker. Earlier this year, Reuters had reported that the Peugeots were willing to relinquish control so that GM could take a larger stake in PSA, though General Motors has since indicated that they don’t plan to increase their holdings in PSA.

PSA now has three factories in China under a joint venture with Dongfeng and Varin was in China for the launch of their fourth Chinese facility, a joint venture with the Chang’An Automobile Group in the southern Chinese city of Shenzhen where PSA will locally assemble the luxury DS series. Including the new factory PSA will have capacity to build almost a million cars a year in China, more than double last year’s sales of 442,000 units in the country.

Responding to the news about a financial tie-up between PSA and Dongfeng, General Motors’ vice chairman Steven Girsky said that the deal involving Dongfeng taking an equity stake in PSA would not affect GM’s partnership with PSA. “We’re not PSA’s only partner so I don’t think it would complicate our situation any more than it would complicate some of their other partners,” Girsky said in New York on Friday. GM bought a 7% stake in PSAas part of its plan to right its European operations.

Girsky said that the affect of the PSA-Dongfeng capital relationship on GM’s own tie-up with PSA would ultimately depend on how much influence the Chinese automaker had on the partnership and on where the vehicles jointly made by PSA and Dongfeng would be sold.

The GM vice chairman reaffirmed GM’s position that right now it will keep it’s investment in PSA at 7% of the equity of the French company. “We bought our 7 percent in the first place not because we wanted significant influence in PSA, but because we wanted to help them with their capital raise at the time,” he said.

Girsky said that the priority of the alliance with PSA is fixing GM’s European operations not finance. GM and PSA have previously announced that they will be jointly developing a minvan platform and it’s been reported that GM would like PSA and Opel to be somewhat integrated.

TTAC Staff
TTAC Staff

More by TTAC Staff

Comments
Join the conversation
 2 comments
  • Corey Lewis Corey Lewis on Sep 30, 2013

    ”We bought our 7 percent in the first place not because we wanted significant influence in PSA, but because we wanted to help them with their capital raise at the time,” he said. Aww, so benevolent. Honestly from a current perspective, I don't think there's much GM could glean from PSA anyway.

  • Spike_in_Brisbane Spike_in_Brisbane on Oct 01, 2013

    If only this could mean a continuation of the Citroen C5 or DS5 with Hydractive suspension and that awesome twin turbo V6 diesel.

  • John Clyne I own a 1997 GMC Suburban that I bought second hand. It was never smoked in but had lost the new car smell when I got it four years after it was sold new. I own a 2005 Chevrolet Avalanche & that still has the new car smell. I like the smell. I could never afford a new car until the Avalanche. It might be my last new car? Why do they build cars with fire retardant materials in them. Smoking rates are falling & if someone continues to smoke in this day & age is a fool especially with all the information out there.
  • Theflyersfan Non-performance models, probably the Civic based on the fact the interior feels and looks better in the Honda. Both of them are going to drive like adequate appliances with small engines and CVTs and get decent mileage, so this is based on where my butt will rest and things my hands and fingers will touch.Toyota doesn't have an answer to the Civic Si so the Honda wins by default.CTR vs GR Corolla. One dealer by me is still tacking on $10,000 markups for the CTR and good luck with the GR Corolla and the "allocation" system. There's that one dealer in Missouri that I pasted their ad a while back wanting $125,000 for a mid-level GR. Nope. But cars.com is still showing markups. Both of these cars will have little depreciation for a while, so the markups equal instant loss. It looks like Cincinnati-area dealers are done with CTR markups. So this is a tough choice. I don't like the Corolla interior. It looks and feels inexpensive. I'm glad Honda toned down the exterior but the excessive wing still looks immature for such an expensive car that 20-somethings likely cannot afford. FWD vs AWD. With price being an object, and long-term maintenance a thing, I'd go with the Honda with a side eye at the Golf R as a mature choice. All with stick shifts.
  • ChristianWimmer Great first car for someone’s teenage daughter.
  • SCE to AUX Imagine the challenge of trying to sell the Ariya or the tired Leaf.
  • Offbeat Oddity I would have to test them out, but the Corolla might actually have a slight edge. I'd prefer the 2.0 in both cars, but to get one in a Civic with a decent amount of equipment, I'd be stuck with the Sport where the fuel economy suffers vs. the Corolla. If the Civic EX had a 2.0, it would be a much tougher decision.
Next