Are We About To Witness MQB's First "Cascading Failure"?

by Derek Kreindler

Published: September 9th, 2013

are we about to witness mqb s first cascading failure

Reports out of the Berlin desk of Reuters suggest that VW could have a fairly large problem on their hands, one that TTAC discussed during heated battles over modular kit architectures – that of “cascading failures”.

Reports by German auto publication Auto Bild suggest that improperly installed HVAC draining tubes in the all new Mark VII VW Golf can leak water into the driver’s footwell. VW confirmed the problem to Reuters, and suggested that 46 individual cases are known to VW.

On the other hand, Auto Bild has suggested that the number could be as high as 300,000 cars, including the Seat Leon and Audi A3, due to the “cascading failure” phenomenon. The new Golf is built on Volkswagen’s MQB architecture, along with models like the Leon and A3, with the architecture having a high degree of common parts across Volkswagen’s entire range. While this allows for cost savings, manufacturing flexibility and shorter assembly times, it also increases the chances of significant failures, in the event of a bad batch of parts or a common engineering defect. The swift felling of hundreds of thousands of cars (or more) due to the failure of a single component is not necessarily new in the auto industry (we’ve seen mega recalls before) but it would be relatively new for it to affect a group of vehicles derived from a single common architecture.

If this is indeed related to a batch of faulty parts, then it would be evidence of a cascading failure. However, it could also be a procedural error committed by a worker, a poorly implemented assembly process or some combination of the above. This could be one of the more interesting stories of the year, as it may be one of the biggest examples of the downsides of the move to modular “kits”.

#AudiA3 #Industry #Kits #Manufacturing #ModularArchitecture #MQB #Volkswagen #VolkswagenGolf

Derek Kreindler

More by Derek Kreindler

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 39 comments

NoGoYo on Sep 09, 2013

GM cars had this problem a lot. As far as I know, it was endemic in L, J, and N-body cars, a fault with assembly robots burning holes in panels to let water in? Dunno if it's that on my car or rotted out cowl seals letting water in at the base of the windshield.

Like Reply
Th009 on Sep 10, 2013

A common architecture or platform does not increase the CHANCE of a failure occurring. In fact, it may reduce it as there are fewer separate different parts and configurations, and presumably the ones that are used can be more thoroughly evaluated and tested. What it does do is increase the IMPACT of a failure occurring, as there will be more individual vehicles with the same part and configuration. It's not quite the same thing ...

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Ravenuer My 2023 CRV EX, 6 mo old, 4800 miles: $0.
TheEndlessEnigma My '16 FiST: Oil changes, tires, valve cover gasket (at 112k miles), coolant flush, brakes.....and that's itMy '19 Grand Caravan: Oil changes, coolant flush
John Clyne I own a 1997 GMC Suburban that I bought second hand. It was never smoked in but had lost the new car smell when I got it four years after it was sold new. I own a 2005 Chevrolet Avalanche & that still has the new car smell. I like the smell. I could never afford a new car until the Avalanche. It might be my last new car? Why do they build cars with fire retardant materials in them. Smoking rates are falling & if someone continues to smoke in this day & age is a fool especially with all the information out there.
Theflyersfan Non-performance models, probably the Civic based on the fact the interior feels and looks better in the Honda. Both of them are going to drive like adequate appliances with small engines and CVTs and get decent mileage, so this is based on where my butt will rest and things my hands and fingers will touch.Toyota doesn't have an answer to the Civic Si so the Honda wins by default.CTR vs GR Corolla. One dealer by me is still tacking on $10,000 markups for the CTR and good luck with the GR Corolla and the "allocation" system. There's that one dealer in Missouri that I pasted their ad a while back wanting $125,000 for a mid-level GR. Nope. But cars.com is still showing markups. Both of these cars will have little depreciation for a while, so the markups equal instant loss. It looks like Cincinnati-area dealers are done with CTR markups. So this is a tough choice. I don't like the Corolla interior. It looks and feels inexpensive. I'm glad Honda toned down the exterior but the excessive wing still looks immature for such an expensive car that 20-somethings likely cannot afford. FWD vs AWD. With price being an object, and long-term maintenance a thing, I'd go with the Honda with a side eye at the Golf R as a mature choice. All with stick shifts.
ChristianWimmer Great first car for someone’s teenage daughter.