Mitsubishi Without A Midsize Sedan For America

Derek Kreindler
by Derek Kreindler

Calling out one’s prediction for Mitsubishi’s demise is an easy activity that requires one to put little at stake. With a stale product lineup, sagging sales and nothing on the horizon save for a B-Segment hatchback, Mitsubishi’s future looks bleak. But that’s not the main reason why I am pessimistic about the brand’s future in America.

The Mitsubishi Galant was precisely nobody’s favorite mid-size sedan, but it was better than nothing. And according to Automotive News, Mitsubishi’s product plans call for bubkis in the D-Segment, which is essentially a death wish in North America, where mid-size sedans are a crucial product.

Tellingly, Mitsubishi doesn’t have one because it lacks any kind of platform architecture to even build a new D-Segment car that would be competitive, an utterly damning indication of how ill-equipped the company is to be competitive on our shores. Even Suzuki had a passable mid-size car in its dying days, one that was quite good at that. For Mitsubishi to lack even a suitable architecture for a D-Segment car is a rather damning statement regarding their readiness to duke it out in an increasingly cutthroat global vehicle market.

Mitsubishi’s product plans appear to hinge on the new Mirage subcompact, a forthcoming Mirage sedan…and that’s it. A new Montero SUV may come here, and we may see a new Lancer within the next two years. The only bright spot is the Evo, which will continue to soldier along, praised by everyone and bought by no one.

Derek Kreindler
Derek Kreindler

More by Derek Kreindler

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 82 comments
  • Jeff S Jeff S on Aug 30, 2013

    When Chrysler cut their ties with Mitsubishi that was when Mitsubishi really declined. The local Dodge dealer where I live in the late 80's and early 90's advertised the Mitsubishi made vehicles for Dodge heavily. Mitsubishi Motors got their start in the US with the Dodge D-50 trucks, Dodge Colts, and Plymouth Arrows. The same was true with Isuzu as well and Mazda is not doing as well either, but Mazda is at least viable. Mitsubishi might not survive in the US market place regardless of what they do. Hyundai and Kia have taken their place and are knocking on Toyota and Honda's door.

  • PaulBAZ PaulBAZ on Sep 03, 2013

    Why would anybody want to buy such a poorly engineered car from Mitsubishi? They deliberately design in the need for special tools to remove components. Things like heater cores removal require the entire interior (2000 Galant) to be removed to get the part out. The dash board falls apart and then the dealer wants $1000 for the part. To get both these components replaced was $2300 from the dealer. Point is – When a Mitsubishi product has a KBB value of $4000 or less and needs this type of part replacement, the vehicle is beyond economical repair. Maybe most people have already figured this out and that is why Mitsubishi sales are in the toilet. Don’t buy any Mitsubishi product until they improve their engineering practices. The last person to leave please remember to turn out the lights. RIP Mitsubishi

  • Probert They already have hybrids, but these won't ever be them as they are built on the modular E-GMP skateboard.
  • Justin You guys still looking for that sportbak? I just saw one on the Facebook marketplace in Arizona
  • 28-Cars-Later I cannot remember what happens now, but there are whiteblocks in this period which develop a "tick" like sound which indicates they are toast (maybe head gasket?). Ten or so years ago I looked at an '03 or '04 S60 (I forget why) and I brought my Volvo indy along to tell me if it was worth my time - it ticked and that's when I learned this. This XC90 is probably worth about $300 as it sits, not kidding, and it will cost you conservatively $2500 for an engine swap (all the ones I see on car-part.com have north of 130K miles starting at $1,100 and that's not including freight to a shop, shop labor, other internals to do such as timing belt while engine out etc).
  • 28-Cars-Later Ford reported it lost $132,000 for each of its 10,000 electric vehicles sold in the first quarter of 2024, according to CNN. The sales were down 20 percent from the first quarter of 2023 and would “drag down earnings for the company overall.”The losses include “hundreds of millions being spent on research and development of the next generation of EVs for Ford. Those investments are years away from paying off.” [if they ever are recouped] Ford is the only major carmaker breaking out EV numbers by themselves. But other marques likely suffer similar losses. https://www.zerohedge.com/political/fords-120000-loss-vehicle-shows-california-ev-goals-are-impossible Given these facts, how did Tesla ever produce anything in volume let alone profit?
  • AZFelix Let's forego all of this dilly-dallying with autonomous cars and cut right to the chase and the only real solution.
Next