Steal Me! I'm An F-250

by Bertel Schmitt

Published: July 9th, 2013

Prematurely pronounced dead, trucks are back in favor. They never went out of style with one eclectic clientele: Thieves. “Thieves continue to target large pickups and large SUVs at higher rates than other vehicles,” says the Highway Loss Data Institute (HLDI) that keeps track of these things. “No. 1 on this year’s list, the four-wheel-drive F-250 crew cab, has a claim frequency of 7 per 1,000 insured vehicle years, or nearly 6 times the average for all vehicles.”

The Ford F-250 has replaced the Cadillac Escalade, formerly the most loved by crooks. The HLDI cites “new antitheft technology on the Escalade, as well as its waning popularity,” as the two likely reasons.

“General Motors has put a lot of effort into new antitheft technology, so that may help explain the decline in the Escalade’s theft rate,” says HLDI Vice President Matt Moore. “On the other hand, sales of the Escalade have fallen in recent years, so there may be less of a market for stolen Escalades or Escalade parts.”

If you want to find your car where you left it, get a Toyota Sienna 4WD, or a Jeep Compass. Thieves hate them.

INSURANCE THEFT CLAIMS, 2010-12 PASSENGER VEHICLESVehicle size/typeClaim feq.Avg. loss pmt per claimOverall theft lossesHIGHEST CLAIM RATESFord F-250 crew 4WDvery large pickup7.0$7,060$50Chevrolet Silverado 1500 crewlarge pickup6.7$5,463$37Chevrolet Avalanche 1500very large SUV6.1$6,163$38GMC Sierra 1500 crewlarge pickup6.0$6,366$38Ford F-350 crew 4WDvery large pickup5.6$7,517$42Cadillac Escalade 4WDlarge luxury SUV5.5$6,508$36Chevrolet Suburban 1500very large SUV5.4$4,468$24GMC Sierra 1500 extended cablarge pickup4.7$5,908$28GMC Yukonlarge SUV4.5$6,276$28Chevrolet Tahoelarge SUV4.4$5,367$23LOWEST CLAIM RATESDodge Journey 4WDmidsize SUV0.4$5,016$2Volkswagen Tiguan 4WDsmall SUV0.4$10,352$4Audi A4 4-doormidsize luxury car0.4$13,803$5Acura RDXmidsize luxury SUV0.4$8,701$3Toyota Matrixsmall station wagon0.4$7,782$3Lexus HS 250 hybrid 4-doormidsize luxury car0.4$2,226$1Honda CR-Vsmall SUV0.4$4,630$2Hyundai Tucson 4WDsmall SUV0.4$4,134$2Toyota Sienna 4WDvery large minivan0.5$13,038$6Jeep Compass 4WDsmall SUV0.5$5,527$3AVERAGE ALL PASSENGER VEHICLES1.2$6,532$8Note: Claim frequencies are per 1,000 insured vehicle years; overall
losses are average payments per insured vehicle year.. Source:HLDI

#BertelSchmitt #F-250 #Ford #Stolen

Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments

Join the conversation

3 of 6 comments

CJinSD on Jul 09, 2013

Is there any correlation between theft rates and being too big to fit in 90% of garages?

1 Reply
Sigivald on Jul 09, 2013

From what I've learned since getting mine, the SuperDuty series are easy to break into, too - screwdriver to punch out the plastic latch surround and open the lock. I am considering a "Jimmy Jammer", as the most common remedy appears to be called.

Like Reply
- Sigivald on Jul 09, 2013
  
  (Likewise the F250 Crew 4WD and F350 Crew 4WD in those specific places probably closely map their sales popularity. I can't even remember the last time I saw a post-99 SuperDuty that wasn't 4WD, and I see a *lot* of Crew Cabs. Might be that the majority of the Extended and Standard cabs are low-spec work trucks [like mine] and thus not as juicy as a Crew with more seats to steal and fancier guts?)
  
  Like

Recent Comments

W Conrad I'm not afraid of them, but they aren't needed for everyone or everywhere. Long haul and highway driving sure, but in the city, nope.
Jalop1991 In a manner similar to PHEV being the correct answer, I declare RPVs to be the correct answer here.We're doing it with certain aircraft; why not with cars on the ground, using hardware and tools like Telsa's "FSD" or GM's "SuperCruise" as the base?Take the local Uber driver out of the car, and put him in a professional centralized environment from where he drives me around. The system and the individual car can have awareness as well as gates, but he's responsible for the driving.Put the tech into my car, and let me buy it as needed. I need someone else to drive me home; hit the button and voila, I've hired a driver for the moment. I don't want to drive 11 hours to my vacation spot; hire the remote pilot for that. When I get there, I have my car and he's still at his normal location, piloting cars for other people.The system would allow for driver rest period, like what's required for truckers, so I might end up with multiple people driving me to the coast. I don't care. And they don't have to be physically with me, therefore they can be way cheaper.Charge taxi-type per-mile rates. For long drives, offer per-trip rates. Offer subscriptions, including miles/hours. Whatever.(And for grins, dress the remote pilots all as Johnnie.)Start this out with big rigs. Take the trucker away from the long haul driving, and let him be there for emergencies and the short haul parts of the trip.And in a manner similar to PHEVs being discredited, I fully expect to be razzed for this brilliant idea (not unlike how Alan Kay wasn't recognized until many many years later for his Dynabook vision).
B-BodyBuick84 Not afraid of AV's as I highly doubt they will ever be %100 viable for our roads. Stop-and-go downtown city or rush hour highway traffic? I can see that, but otherwise there's simply too many variables. Bad weather conditions, faded road lines or markings, reflective surfaces with glare, etc. There's also the issue of cultural norms. About a decade ago there was actually an online test called 'The Morality Machine' one could do online where you were in control of an AV and choose what action to take when a crash was inevitable. I think something like 2.5 million people across the world participated? For example, do you hit and most likely kill the elderly couple strolling across the crosswalk or crash the vehicle into a cement barrier and almost certainly cause the death of the vehicle occupants? What if it's a parent and child? In N. America 98% of people choose to hit the elderly couple and save themselves while in Asia, the exact opposite happened where 98% choose to hit the parent and child. Why? Cultural differences. Asia puts a lot of emphasis on respecting their elderly while N. America has a culture of 'save/ protect the children'. Are these AV's going to respect that culture? Is a VW Jetta or Buick Envision AV going to have different programming depending on whether it's sold in Canada or Taiwan? how's that going to effect legislation and legal battles when a crash inevitibly does happen? These are the true barriers to mass AV adoption, and in the 10 years since that test came out, there has been zero answers or progress on this matter. So no, I'm not afraid of AV's simply because with the exception of a few specific situations, most avenues are going to prove to be a dead-end for automakers.
Mike Bradley Autonomous cars were developed in Silicon Valley. For new products there, the standard business plan is to put a barely-functioning product on the market right away and wait for the early-adopter customers to find the flaws. That's exactly what's happened. Detroit's plan is pretty much the opposite, but Detroit isn't developing this product. That's why dealers, for instance, haven't been trained in the cars.
Dartman https://apnews.com/article/artificial-intelligence-fighter-jets-air-force-6a1100c96a73ca9b7f41cbd6a2753fdaAutonomous/Ai is here now. The question is implementation and acceptance.