Piston Slap: The Fuel Hating Tranny

by Sajeev Mehta

Updated: May 16th, 2014 Published: February 20th, 2013

Eric writes:

My question is for Sanjeev Mehta. I purchased a 2010 4 cylinder automatic Toyota Camry LE new and have been using it as my daily driver since. My commute is almost all city driving, so I noticed a quirk about the car right away.

During deceleration, the transmission seems to starve the engine almost to stalling, followed by a downshift and repeated until a stop is reached. This makes for a very jerky process for people like me that like to lightly brake for longer distances before stopping. I asked the dealership about it, they told me it was normal and it will go away after ”learning” my driving habits. Two years later, it still is around. From cruising the web and Edmunds, it seems all of the Camrys with the 6 speed auto suffer from this problem. My question is, why does this happen, why on earth would Toyota put this in their cars, and why has every professional review I’ve read of the car not highlight this problem? Is there anything I can do to alleviate this persistent problem? I had the dealership apply a TSB Toyota released for this issue a year ago, but it has not helped at all.

Sanjeev answers:

Do other TTAC writers have the same common/uncommon name mix up problem too? What say you, Jake Baruth, Stephan Lang and Derrick Kriendler? But, I know, I know…not everything is about me. So let’s do this thang.

After a bit of Googling, perhaps your dealer applied T-SB-0287-10:

“To improve the shifting performance and smoothness during acceleration, the Engine Control Module (ECM, SAE term: Powertrain Control Module/PCM) and Transaxle Control Module (TCM) calibration has been revised.”

But this link points to something more relevant, and interesting. Many (all?) electronically fuel injected vehicles cut fuel to the engine when “extended braking” in this manner. They’ve done it since the dawn of EEC-IV fuel injection on my super-precious Ford Fox bodies, that’s for sure. But ye olde Foxes (5.0V8, 4-speed auto) don’t bog very much at all as they slow down to idle. So what’s the problem?

When you slow down through 6 forward gears, the motor bogs down far more often than older vehicles with only 3 or 4 cogs to swap. When you combine this EFI program with the lack of low-end torque in modern engines (relative to the low revving engines from yesteryear) and the torque converter’s stall speed (and the computer programming added to it) you have a recipe for a boggy, clumsy downshift. In these “extended braking” situations, that is.

Simply(?) put, there are computer programs designed for maximum fuel efficiency, too many downshifting gears, computer controlled spinning fans (torque converter) and a relative lack of balls in rev-happy modern engines to ensure smooth downshifting. You’re gonna have to live with it.

Or change the way you brake. Or get a ~~Lincoln Town Car~~ stick shift.

Send your queries to sajeev@thetruthaboutcars.com. Spare no details and ask for a speedy resolution if you’re in a hurry.

#6-speed #Braking #Camry #Downshifting #EEC-IV #EngineComputer #FuelEconomy #FuelShutOff

Sajeev Mehta

More by Sajeev Mehta

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 54 comments

Tbone33 on Feb 20, 2013

The problem with torque converters is that they rob horsepower/MPGs and aren't crisp in their shifts, problems that multi-clutch automatics remedy. The problem with multi-clutch transmissions is that they don't offer the smoothness that torque converters provide. As is often the case with new technology we have gone from one extreme to the other. Mazda presently has the best solution in their SkyActiv transmission, as they have married a multi-clutch tranny with a torque converter that is only used at low speed. Eventually someone will develop a more elegant solution with fewer moving parts. Then we'll have something 90% as good as a manual.

Like Reply
Cabriolet on Feb 20, 2013

Jeff Waingrom Your TDI has a built in electric heater. Just turn the temp dial to full heat and the electric heater will be turned on. Diesel,s take a long time to warm up if possable drive in a lower gear to keep the engine speed up or install an engine heater. Works great on cold days. Have a DSG transmission in my 2011 GTI and i love it. Only way i know it is shifting is to look at the tech. Slowing up for a red light is very smooth. If you have any trouble in up shifting or down shifting contact your VW dealer. They have some TSB's to cover that. I always drove a stick shift all my life but i can not shift as fast as the DSG. And the best part is i get better gas mileage with the DSG then driving a stick. Enjoy

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Varezhka I have still yet to see a Malibu on the road that didn't have a rental sticker. So yeah, GM probably lost money on every one they sold but kept it to boost their CAFE numbers.I'm personally happy that I no longer have to dread being "upgraded" to a Maxima or a Malibu anymore. And thankfully Altima is also on its way out.
Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
GregLocock Car companies can only really sell cars that people who are new car buyers will pay a profitable price for. As it turns out fewer and fewer new car buyers want sedans. Large sedans can be nice to drive, certainly, but the number of new car buyers (the only ones that matter in this discussion) are prepared to sacrifice steering and handling for more obvious things like passenger and cargo space, or even some attempt at off roading. We know US new car buyers don't really care about handling because they fell for FWD in large cars.
Slavuta Why is everybody sweating? Like sedans? - go buy one. Better - 2. Let CRV/RAV rust on the dealer lot. I have 3 sedans on the driveway. My neighbor - 2. Neighbors on each of our other side - 8 SUVs.
Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.