Generation Why: Lincoln Is About To Lose Them

Derek Kreindler
by Derek Kreindler

If it weren’t for a Manhattan nightclub shooting in 1999, there’s a very good chance that it would be Cadillac, not Lincoln, that would be undertaking a costly showroom upgrade program, a brand “reboot” to shed a mushy identity and a hail-mary attempt at saving the ailing luxury division.

The shooting I’m referring to, involving Sean “P.Diddy” Combs, Jennifer Lopez and rapper/ ba’al teshuva Shyne effectively ended Lincoln’s connection to the main cultural medium of the last two decades; hip-hop music. A former Ford PR exec explained that once upon a time, when shiny track suits were the height of fashion among urban musicians, Lincoln and P. Diddy were going to collaborate on a product placement/endorsement deal, that would see the car featured in rap videos, magazine photo shoots and song lyrics. It was a fairly sophisticated marketing strategy that would likely have changed Lincoln’s fortunes for the better. Unfortunately, the scandal surrounding the nightclub shooting, and the fact that Diddy’s company-car Navigator had a hidden stashbox for pistols and god knows what else, led Ford to cancel the deal. And guess who stepped in to fill the void?

Cadillac. Was the 1999 Navigator a better car than the barely disguised Denali-with-a-Caddy-crest that was the 1999 Escalade? Maybe so. It doesn’t really matter. From that point on, the Escalade was everywhere. it still is everywhere, from crappy reality shows to rap videos to car services to UN diplomat transportation. I’d go as far as to argue that it was not only a watershed moment in automotive trivia, but in our culture at large. It was the moment when the Saab 900s and Volkswagen Jettas pushed by Q-Tip and Biggie (as in, driven, not marketed) were inadequate. The Escalade was flashy, and it cost a lot of money. It was the moment when a whole generation of consumers suddenly became hopelessly aspirational, when Cadillac ceased to become a car a symbol of American luxury, but instead a symbol of vulgarity. The car of choice for Don Draper is now the car of choice for The Situation. The Escalades dominance was only cemented when Lincoln tried to challenge the Escalade EXT on its own turf with both the Blackwood and Mark LT pickups. They were about as well received as Planned Parenthood canvasser knocking on the door of the Santorum family home.

The Escalade may be today’s version of the Sixty Special, but today’s Lincoln is a shadow of its former self. When I reviewed the Navigator back in February, most of my cohort was amazed that the Navigator was still in production. When I had the Escalade a year early, I was bombarded with request for rides and pleas to chauffeur my friends to nightclubs on the weekend. Even my ex-girlfriend asked if I could take her for a drive. The fact that the Escalade is, at best, a long-in-the-tooth tarted up GM full-size SUV is irrelevant. It has more cachet with Generation Why than any Lincoln has had in decades.

The Lincoln brand itself isn’t entirely poison amongst young people. The 1963 Continental, which had a big role on shows like Entourage is frequently cited as one of the most beautiful cars that people my age can think of. The Town Car even has its own prestige among a certain crowd that is less comfortable with conspicuous consumption. Said one friend of mine “if you see a Phantom pull up, it’s usually driven by a guy wearing a scarf and sunglasses even though it’s night-time in August. If you see a Town Car idling at the curb, he’s either very important, on his way to the airport – or both.”

The problem is, there’s nothing in the lineup right now that is as remotely compelling as either of those cars. And while Generation Why may not have to money to buy a Lincoln just yet, their average consumer age is 60 years old, the highest in the industry. At 57, Cadillac isn’t far behind, but they’ve already got the brand equity built up to ensure that a Millennial will seriously consider an ATS once he’s on the partner track. But will they give Lincoln a second look?

In 24 hours, we’ll know whether Lincoln sinks or swims. All the boutique showrooms and smartphone-enabled service bays mean nothing if the new MKZ is not an absolute knockout. The car has glimmers of promise; despite the buff books oohing and aahing over the V6 option, the real “killer app” will be the hybrid. If it can match the Fusions 47/44 mpg rating, Lincoln will give consumers a compelling reason to purchase one based on green snobbery alone. The tech-laden interior and panoramic targa sunroof rumored to be coming should also provide more tangible novelty in a segment saturated with endless tech gadgets and marketing narrative fluff. These details matter more than rear-drive, direct injection or Nurburgring lap times. As much as Cadillac may tout these, the truth is that anyone buying an ATS will be doing so to impress other people, not for any sort of performance pedigree.

The MKZ’s entry-level price relative to its competitors means that Generation Why may have a real shot of affording these cars soon. But the car’s biggest obstacle won’t be the “wrong wheel drive” chassis or the lack of a European pedigree. It will be the 2013 Ford Fusion. If too many of them get wise to the fact that the MKZ is a more expensive version of the Fusion, a car that “looks like an Aston” has identical mechanical bits, a sharp interior with all the tech toys, then the 20 percent price premium for the Lincoln may no longer seen so appealing. Generation Why may be the most aspirational of all, but they’re the ones who became financially responsible for themselves during the height of the Great Recession, and they’re never above passing up good value. Lincoln may be a premium brand, but they’re not premium enough to justify the extra money. If that ends up being the case, can Lincoln even justify its own existence? Without the Town Car, or any statement of big, American luxury, their cars have turned into ill-defined, awkwardly priced pseudo-luxury vehicles that still have numerous redeeming qualities. That sounds a little too familiar.

Derek Kreindler
Derek Kreindler

More by Derek Kreindler

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 98 comments
  • Ponchoman49 Ponchoman49 on May 15, 2012

    Lincoln should just rename the last letter of all there cars. The MKS should really be the MKT where T is for Taurus The MKZ should really be the MKF where F is for Fusion The MKX should really be the MKE where E is for Edge Last but not least the MKT should be the MKM where M is for mistake

  • Ghandouram Ghandouram on May 27, 2012

    Lincoln is the sick man of luxury brands...sad but true. The essence of the problem is that Ford bean counters are trying to run a luxury brand with a common cars maker mentality. I look at the Lincoln MKZ and see the Cadillac Cimarron fiasco all over again! Lincoln needs to be a brash, in your face LUXURY brand...not an outlet of spruced up Flexes, Fusions ans Tauruses! All Lincoln cars lack presence on the showroom floor. Something they had had with the Town Car.if I were given free reign to to run Lincoln, I would temporarily shut down, do something about the hideous front end styling , and eliminate the cheap looking long front overhangs . Sleek ,unique styling to recapture the presence of ,say, the 1963 Continintal...bring back the old , established nameplates...enough of the MK blah blah blah. Sorry if this will offend anyone....but I'm not a diplomat, not when it comes to one of my favorite nameplates. Thank you very much.

  • Jalop1991 In a manner similar to PHEV being the correct answer, I declare RPVs to be the correct answer here.We're doing it with certain aircraft; why not with cars on the ground, using hardware and tools like Telsa's "FSD" or GM's "SuperCruise" as the base?Take the local Uber driver out of the car, and put him in a professional centralized environment from where he drives me around. The system and the individual car can have awareness as well as gates, but he's responsible for the driving.Put the tech into my car, and let me buy it as needed. I need someone else to drive me home; hit the button and voila, I've hired a driver for the moment. I don't want to drive 11 hours to my vacation spot; hire the remote pilot for that. When I get there, I have my car and he's still at his normal location, piloting cars for other people.The system would allow for driver rest period, like what's required for truckers, so I might end up with multiple people driving me to the coast. I don't care. And they don't have to be physically with me, therefore they can be way cheaper.Charge taxi-type per-mile rates. For long drives, offer per-trip rates. Offer subscriptions, including miles/hours. Whatever.(And for grins, dress the remote pilots all as Johnnie.)Start this out with big rigs. Take the trucker away from the long haul driving, and let him be there for emergencies and the short haul parts of the trip.And in a manner similar to PHEVs being discredited, I fully expect to be razzed for this brilliant idea (not unlike how Alan Kay wasn't recognized until many many years later for his Dynabook vision).
  • B-BodyBuick84 Not afraid of AV's as I highly doubt they will ever be %100 viable for our roads. Stop-and-go downtown city or rush hour highway traffic? I can see that, but otherwise there's simply too many variables. Bad weather conditions, faded road lines or markings, reflective surfaces with glare, etc. There's also the issue of cultural norms. About a decade ago there was actually an online test called 'The Morality Machine' one could do online where you were in control of an AV and choose what action to take when a crash was inevitable. I think something like 2.5 million people across the world participated? For example, do you hit and most likely kill the elderly couple strolling across the crosswalk or crash the vehicle into a cement barrier and almost certainly cause the death of the vehicle occupants? What if it's a parent and child? In N. America 98% of people choose to hit the elderly couple and save themselves while in Asia, the exact opposite happened where 98% choose to hit the parent and child. Why? Cultural differences. Asia puts a lot of emphasis on respecting their elderly while N. America has a culture of 'save/ protect the children'. Are these AV's going to respect that culture? Is a VW Jetta or Buick Envision AV going to have different programming depending on whether it's sold in Canada or Taiwan? how's that going to effect legislation and legal battles when a crash inevitibly does happen? These are the true barriers to mass AV adoption, and in the 10 years since that test came out, there has been zero answers or progress on this matter. So no, I'm not afraid of AV's simply because with the exception of a few specific situations, most avenues are going to prove to be a dead-end for automakers.
  • Mike Bradley Autonomous cars were developed in Silicon Valley. For new products there, the standard business plan is to put a barely-functioning product on the market right away and wait for the early-adopter customers to find the flaws. That's exactly what's happened. Detroit's plan is pretty much the opposite, but Detroit isn't developing this product. That's why dealers, for instance, haven't been trained in the cars.
  • Dartman https://apnews.com/article/artificial-intelligence-fighter-jets-air-force-6a1100c96a73ca9b7f41cbd6a2753fdaAutonomous/Ai is here now. The question is implementation and acceptance.
  • FreedMike If Dodge were smart - and I don't think they are - they'd spend their money refreshing and reworking the Durango (which I think is entering model year 3,221), versus going down the same "stuff 'em full of motor and give 'em cool new paint options" path. That's the approach they used with the Charger and Challenger, and both those models are dead. The Durango is still a strong product in a strong market; why not keep it fresher?
Next