Texas Appeals Court Upholds License Scanners for Traffic Stops

The Newspaper
by The Newspaper

Police in Texas have the right to stop motorists if a license plate recognition camera system suspects the vehicle’s owner lacks automobile insurance. In an unpublished ruling last Wednesday, a three-judge panel of the Texas Court of Appeals refused the attempt by Kenneth Ray Short to have a March 2010 traffic stop declared illegal.


Officer Daniel McGrew’s patrol car had been equipped with an automated license plate recognition system (ALPR, also known as ANPR in the UK) that photographed and recorded the identity of every passing vehicle. When Short drove past, an instantaneous computerized database search returned a result that Short’s insurance coverage was “unconfirmed for 45 days or more and expired.” Sometimes, when the system returns just that the plate is “unconfirmed” it means the Department of Insurance database is unable to say whether or not the vehicle is insured, and it is the police department’s policy not to stop such vehicles. In this case, the system claimed Short’s car had not been insured since December 6, 2009, so McGrew conducted a traffic stop.

Short appealed, citing an appellate decision last year that found a traffic stop could not be based on a report that insurance information for a vehicle was unavailable. The three-judge panel disagreed with Short because the information returned was far more complete and Officer McGrew testified that he believed the system was “very accurate.”

“It is our opinion that the trial court could reasonably conclude that a reasonably objective officer could form a reasonable suspicion based on the evidence provided from the database inquiry in this case, and from that information, the officer could have formed a reasonable belief that the car Short was driving was not covered by an insurance policy,” Justice Hollis Horton wrote. “Because the trial court, on the facts before it, could reasonably choose to believe Officer McGrew’s testimony and decide to deny Short’s motion to suppress evidence, we overrule Short’s sole issue on appeal.”

Short was convicted of possessing less than three ounces of marijuana. The Texas Department of Insurance set up the TexasSure Vehicle Insurance Verification database in June 2008. Companies like InsureNet had hired lobbyists hoping to convince the legislature to use a version of the database to issue automated uninsured motorist tickets, generating millions in revenue.

A copy of the unpublished decision is available in a 115k PDF file at the source link below.

Source:

Short v. Texas (Court of Appeals, State of Texas, 8/10/2011)

[Courtesy: Thenewspaper.com]

The Newspaper
The Newspaper

More by The Newspaper

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 24 comments
  • Pch101 Pch101 on Aug 16, 2011

    Now that I've read the ruling, I have to yet again question the accuracy of The Newspaper's work. Contrary to what the headline says, the issue in the case was not about electronic scanners. The issue was one of whether a stop was permitted when a database comes back with inconclusive, as opposed to definitive, results. In this case, a database check stated that the insurance status of the vehicle was "unconfirmed." The issue here was one of whether an "unconfirmed" finding from a database was a strong enough result in order to justify a stop, which would then allow further investigation. Apparently, it is.

  • CarPerson CarPerson on Aug 16, 2011

    I did a "ride-along" with a city police officer a few years back. His right hand almost never left the computer, keying in license numbers almost the whole shift. He caught a few expired plates but didn't want to disrupt traffic to swing around and stop the offender. He did, however, make a mental note of the vehicle and the neighborhood it was coming out of...

  • Jalop1991 ES500eToo close to Fiat there, guy.
  • Astigmatism I consider myself a car guy, and I couldn’t pick the XT4/XT5/XT6 out of a lineup. Hell, until I read this article I didn’t realize there were three of them.I was interested in the CT4-V Blackwing when I was car shopping last summer, but the $62K MSRP turned into $90K+ list prices from dealers. Hell no I’m not paying optioned-up M3 Comp money for a slower car with that interior.
  • 3-On-The-Tree Keep the 6.2L V8 as the standard engine and get rid of the other V6 turbo engine options. Cadillac needs to get back to their V8 roots.
  • Turbo Is Black Magic I would probably bet billions on a $350,000 halo car… but insist on bucking all buying trends and build a sedan with an ugly rear and awkward proportions.What do the peasants know anyway.Also more letters and numbers for car names, probably spend another $300 million to buy the YKK trademark… I know most of the common folk associated those 3 magic letters with a zipper they broke last week…. But close your eyes and picture a generic midsize CUV… now say YKK… get it?!Also move headquarters locations again. Kensington PA comes to mind… it can only go up!
  • Coo65757652 A reminder to those of you who expect more from GM: "We are in the business of making money, not cars"(1964: CFO of GM).
Next