AB 529: California's Red Light Revenue Raid

Highway Robbery Dot Net
by Highway Robbery Dot Net

Not satisfied with impoverishing residents and unwary visitors with $500 automated tickets for being a tenth of a second late at a light, California’s legislators are moving a new bill allowing cities to reduce many posted speed limits by 5 mph. The lower limits will, in turn, allow them to shorten yellow lights, which will produce more red light camera tickets (four of the sponsoring cities have red light cameras).


And how many more tickets you ask? The shortening permitted by a 5 mph decrease in the posted limit will increase the number of tickets by an estimated 50% at least. Worse, the shortening will increase severe accidents, by an estimated 30%. (If you are wondering why the accident rate increases less than does the number of violations, it is because most of the severe intersection accidents occur multiple seconds after the light has gone red, involving a driver who has failed to see the red light, at all, because he is impaired by a medical condition, liquor, or drugs.)

Assembly Bill 529, by Assemblymember Michael Gatto (Glendale), is moving through Sacramento fast, with a critical hearing scheduled soon [latest version and tracking here].

If this bill passes in California, other states will likely follow suit. If you are concerned, phone your state legislators, as soon as you see this. It takes no more than a couple minutes per call. And then if you have more time, phone your auto club and ask them to oppose this bill – or anything like it in your state.

The bill in detail:

Every seven to ten years the city traffic engineer goes out to the street and uses a radar gun to measure the speed of 100 cars. Then he discards the 15 fastest cars. The speed of the fastest car remaining is the “85th percentile speed.” (AB 529 does not change this part of the survey process.)

Under present law, the engineer then rounds the 85th percentile speed to the nearest 5 mph increment, which can be up or down depending upon what the 85th percentile was found to be. That 5 mph increment becomes the posted speed limit, unless the engineer is able to cite a dangerous road condition that would not be visible to a driver (Cal. Vehicle Code Sec. 627 uses the phrase “conditions not readily apparent to the driver”), such as a higher-than-average accident rate or a hidden driveway. If the street is a dangerous one, the engineer can lower the posted limit to the next-lower 5 mph increment. Thus, an 85th of 33 or 34, normally posted as 35, can be lowered to 30 if there is a hidden danger or a high accident rate.

If AB 529 passes, no longer will the engineer be required to round to the nearest 5 mph increment. He will be allowed to round down, anytime he wishes, even if the street is a safe one; He will not need to cite a dangerous condition as justification. Thus, the speed limit on any (and potentially every) street having an 85th of 33 or 34 could be lowered from 35 down to 30 – even where there is a very low incidence of accidents. The same would apply to every street having an 85th of 38 or 39; The speed limit could be lowered from 40 down to 35.

[Courtesy: An editor of highwayrobbery.net]

Highway Robbery Dot Net
Highway Robbery Dot Net

More by Highway Robbery Dot Net

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 23 comments
  • EyeMWing EyeMWing on Jun 21, 2011

    The solution here is to GET THE HELL ON THE GAS every time you see a not-a-cop with a radar gun. If we can just get 16% of motorists into that mindset, we're golden.

    • See 1 previous
    • EyeMWing EyeMWing on Jun 22, 2011

      @chris724 White or yellow pickup truck out in the open where they can get good look = not a cop. Anything else, particularly hidden behind an obstacle = cop. If you're close enough to see a radar gun, you're close enough to assess who's holding it.

  • Bryce Bryce on Jun 21, 2011

    California thats the place that put actors in charge What did you expect huh

  • 1995 SC On the plus side, I found a sedan I want to buy
  • Teddyc73 As I asked earlier under another article, when did "segment" or "class" become "space"? Does using that term make one feel more sophisticated? If GM's products in other segments...I mean "space" is more profitable then sedans then why shouldn't they discontinue it.
  • Robert Absolutely!!! I hate SUV's , I like the better gas milage and better ride and better handling!! Can't take a SUV 55mph into a highway exit ramp! I can in my Malibu and there's more than enough room for 5 and trunk is plenty big enough for me!
  • Teddyc73 Since when did automakers or car companies become "OEM". Probably about the same time "segment" or "class" became "space". I wish there were more sedans. I would like an American sedan. However, as others have stated, if they don't sell in large enough quantities to be profitable the automakers...I mean, "OEMs" aren't going to build them. It's simple business.
  • Varezhka I have still yet to see a Malibu on the road that didn't have a rental sticker. So yeah, GM probably lost money on every one they sold but kept it to boost their CAFE numbers.I'm personally happy that I no longer have to dread being "upgraded" to a Maxima or a Malibu anymore. And thankfully Altima is also on its way out.
Next