What's Wrong With This Picture: With Partners Like These Edition

by Edward Niedermeyer

Published: December 30th, 2010

what s wrong with this picture with partners like these edition

Does this new BAIC BC301Z remind you of anything? How about the Mercedes-Benz B-Class (with perhaps a touch of Opel Meriva in the headlights)? Sure, it’s about a foot shorter than the B-Class, and it uses old Mitsu motors, but the resemblance is tough to deny. Still, whether you see the connection or not, Daimler probably does. After all, BAIC is supposed to be Daimler’s Chinese-market partner. But with partners like BAIC, who needs competitors? [via AutoBild]

#3WTP #China #Design

Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 4 comments

MrWhopee on Dec 30, 2010

I don't understand why manufacturers blatantly copy other vehicles' styling like this. What's the point, really? Do they really think people will mistakenly buy their car while actually shopping for the donor vehicle? Average people might spot it on the road and mistakenly identify it as the donor vehicle ("Ooh, look, a Mercedes!), and the owner will get a slight boost of prestige from this, but as soon as they found out it's a cheap imitation they'll suffer a serious reputation drop ("wannabe but can't afford the real thing!") And what does it say to the manufacturers? The word unimaginative, uncreative, shameless, no morals, untrustworthy, etc. comes into mind. I wouldn't buy a toothpick from such a company, never mind a car. Even weirder is that the car isn't even a copy of the B-class underneath, but a different class of car altogether. I think it makes much more sense to copy the B-car's underpinnings (presumably would be better engineered than they could do on their own) and give it an original styling, than vice versa.

Like Reply
Tosh on Dec 30, 2010

Before we are outraged on Daimler's behalf, why don't we hear what Daimler has to say about the matter?

Like Reply

Recent Comments

TheEndlessEnigma I would mandate the elimination of all autonomous driving tech in automobiles. And specifically for GM....sorry....gm....I would mandate On Star be offered as an option only.Not quite the question you asked but.....you asked.
MaintenanceCosts There's not a lot of meat to this (or to an argument in the opposite direction) without some data comparing the respective frequency of "good" activations that prevent a collision and false alarms. The studies I see show between 25% and 40% reduction in rear-end crashes where AEB is installed, so we have one side of that equation, but there doesn't seem to be much if any data out there on the frequency of false activations, especially false activations that cause a collision.
Zerocred Automatic emergency braking scared the hell out of me. I was coming up on a line of stopped cars that the Jeep (Grand Cherokee) thought was too fast and it blared out an incredibly loud warbling sound while applying the brakes. I had the car under control and wasn’t in danger of hitting anything. It was one of those ‘wtf just happened’ moments.I like adaptive cruise control, the backup camera and the warning about approaching emergency vehicles. I’m ambivalent  about rear cross traffic alert and all the different tones if it thinks I’m too close to anything. I turned off lane keep assist, auto start-stop, emergency backup stop. The Jeep also has automatic parking (parallel and back in), which I’ve never used.
MaintenanceCosts Mandatory speed limiters.Flame away - I'm well aware this is the most unpopular opinion on the internet - but the overwhelming majority of the driving population has not proven itself even close to capable of managing unlimited vehicles, and it's time to start dealing with it.Three important mitigations have to be in place:(1) They give 10 mph grace on non-limited-access roads and 15-20 on limited-access roads. The goal is not exact compliance but stopping extreme speeding.(2) They work entirely locally, except for downloading speed limit data for large map segments (too large to identify with any precision where the driver is). Neither location nor speed data is ever uploaded.(3) They don't enforce on private property, only on public roadways. Race your track cars to your heart's content.
GIJOOOE Anyone who thinks that sleazbag used car dealers no longer exist in America has obviously never been in the military. Doesn’t matter what branch nor assigned duty station, just drive within a few miles of a military base and you’ll see more sleazbags selling used cars than you can imagine. So glad I never fell for their scams, but there are literally tens of thousands of soldiers/sailors/Marines/airmen who have been sold a pos car on a 25% interest rate.