FoMoCo, Lincoln Dealers Face Off Over Buyouts And Upgrades

by Edward Niedermeyer

Published: October 25th, 2010

fomoco lincoln dealers face off over buyouts and upgrades

With Mercury going the way of Olds and Pontiac, Ford has made much of its intentions to turn its struggling Lincoln brand around. Ford has promised a $2b investment in Lincoln’s product line, and is pushing for the closure of 200 or so Lincoln dealers in order to concentrate the brand’s weak sales at its most successful dealers. But that’s not all. Ford is requiring the surviving Lincoln dealerships to invest heavily, as much as $2m per store, to stay on board the Lincoln Revival Express. But, according to Automotive News [sub], the Lincoln dealers are starting to wonder if they’re being asked for too much. One dealer tells the industry paper

They told us there would be no new products for about 24 months. I don’t know how the stand-alone Lincoln dealers are going to make it, especially those dealers who have to spend $2 million on their upgrades.Ford has offered several Lincoln stores between $300k and $1.5m to give up ideally-located franchises that they refused to upgrade, but it seems that few dealers are simply rolling over. In fact, the dealer who was offered $1.5m rejected Ford’s offer, calling it “very low” for his profitable franchise. And that’s the polite response. A dealer who was offered less tells AN“Insulted” isn’t a harmful enough word to describe it. It’s asinine. I’m getting my numbers together and going back. I’m not going to accept this.Ford, for its part, says the “status quo is not an option,” a position that puts the factory and dealers in place for a nice round of brutal negotiations. And since Ford lacks to the tools to force its entire network to update, it will either have to pay up or live with at least a few remnants of the status quo. And as long as Lincoln’s products remain largely status quo, that’s probably the way it should be.

#Branding #Cull #DealerNews #Dealership #Sales #Upgrade

Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments

Join the conversation

4 of 10 comments

BklynPete on Oct 25, 2010

Basho. Here's what history can tell us. The last time Ford only had two brands -- and it happened to be these two brands -- was in the mid-Thirties. They took Lincoln downscale with the Zephyr. They had to compete with Packard's110/120, Cadillac's Sixty (source of LaSalle's demise), the mainstream Chryslers were separated from the Imperials, etc. Priced just a bit above Buicks, these were the "near-luxury" cars of their day and kept some brands alive. While the Zephyr proved to be a dog that couldn't hunt, it morphed into the beautiful and luxurious Continental. The masses ended up with Mercury as the aspirational step-up brand from Ford. So what's the takeaway? Does Ford start the same thing all over again, or just be Ford?

Like Reply
- PrincipalDan on Oct 25, 2010
  
  My biggest problem with your argument (which is historically accurate BTW) is that now you can get all the bells and whistles on a Ford that you can get on a Lincoln. So now what's the distinction? The Lincoln name doesn't carry cachet anymore. Back in the day, Mercury's had features that could not be ordered on a Ford, but not all the options you could get on a Lincoln. That was truly a stair-step model.
  
  Like
BklynPete on Oct 25, 2010

The one other point I forget to add was last week's Curbside Classic, the 1961 Ford Thunderbird. OK, it's been 50 years, but doesn't its success (and that of more recent niche stuff like the Shelby, Ford GT, etc.) prove the public may be willing to pay premium prices for a superior product with the Ford brand name on it?

Like Reply
- BklynPete on Oct 26, 2010
  
  Educator(of teachers)Dan: There's definitely no need for a Mercury (sorry Jerry Flint, may you R.I.P.) and if I read you correctly, none for Lincoln either. And with each passing day, I'm inclined to agree with "One Ford."
  
  Like

Recent Comments

GregLocock Car companies can only really sell cars that people who are new car buyers will pay a profitable price for. As it turns out fewer and fewer new car buyers want sedans. Large sedans can be nice to drive, certainly, but the number of new car buyers (the only ones that matter in this discussion) are prepared to sacrifice steering and handling for more obvious things like passenger and cargo space, or even some attempt at off roading. We know US new car buyers don't really care about handling because they fell for FWD in large cars.
Slavuta Why is everybody sweating? Like sedans? - go buy one. Better - 2. Let CRV/RAV rust on the dealer lot. I have 3 sedans on the driveway. My neighbor - 2. Neighbors on each of our other side - 8 SUVs.
Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.
Wjtinfwb Not proud of what Stellantis is rolling out?
Wjtinfwb Absolutely. But not incredibly high-tech, AWD, mega performance sedans with amazing styling and outrageous price tags. GM needs a new Impala and LeSabre. 6 passenger, comfortable, conservative, dead nuts reliable and inexpensive enough for a family guy making 70k a year or less to be able to afford. Ford should bring back the Fusion, modernized, maybe a bit bigger and give us that Hybrid option again. An updated Taurus, harkening back to the Gen 1 and updated version that easily hold 6, offer a huge trunk, elevated handling and ride and modest power that offers great fuel economy. Like the GM have a version that a working mom can afford. The last decade car makers have focused on building cars that American's want, but eliminated what they need. When a Ford Escape of Chevy Blazer can be optioned up to 50k, you've lost the plot.