Ford Sticks With Geely On Volvo Deal. Needs Volvo As Customer And Supplier

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt

“Ford is trying to get the deal done with Zhejiang Geely Holding Group within the next several weeks,” a Ford spokesman said to Dow Jones Newswire. Ford is sticking with Geely, and is pouring cold water on rumors that Ford is entertaining other bids and bidders.

Sweden’s Dagens Industri had reported on Tuesday that Volvo’s CEO Stephen Odell had intimated that “Ford is open to talk with others. Those who say that the door is shut can go to Ford and talk with them whenever they like.” Looks like it’s wishful thinking. Sure, anybody can talk to Ford (if their call is taken.) But they will receive only one answer: “No.”

Ford executives, including Chief Financial Officer Lewis Booth, stressed that Ford has already spent a “considerable amount of time” working with Geely to make sure that Ford’s intellectual property is protected. And they don’t want to go through the whole ordeal again.

Bloomberg reported yesterday that Ford is close to an agreement to preserve trade secrets when Volvo is sold to Geely. “Almost all the outstanding issues have been resolved,” said Tim Burt, a Geely spokesman. “Geely will gain access to all technology throughout the current model range and for those already in development.”

Some technology will be held back, namely new environmental and safety gear.

Ford isn’t just interested to offload Volvo. Ford plans to sell engines to Volvo for as long as a decade, a profitable venture. Ford CFO Lewis Booth underlined their long term goals:

“We want to make sure that if we sell the business, we sell it as a going concern. We need to ensure they have technological support until they can develop it themselves or find it from someone else.”

Ford not only needs Volvo as a customer, they also need them as a supplier. Ford needs Volvo to stay healthy as a supplier of diesel engines for vehicles built in Europe, Booth said. And there could be more commonalities.

Ford’s product development chief Derrick Kuzak, wouldn’t comment when he was asked whether the new Focus introduced at NAIAS would also share the platform with future Volvos. Volvo’s current S40 shares some of the mechanics of the Focus MK 2. The new S40 was scheduled to be based on the platform of the just released Focus MK 3.

Bertel Schmitt
Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 10 comments
  • Master Baiter I told my wife that rather than buying my 13YO son a car when he turns 16, we'd be better off just having him take Lyft everywhere he needs to go. She laughed off the idea, but between the cost of insurance and an extra vehicle, I'd wager that Lyft would be a cheaper option, and safer for the kid as well.
  • Master Baiter Toyota and Honda have sufficient brand equity and manufacturing expertise that they could switch to producing EVs if and when they determine it's necessary based on market realities. If you know how to build cars, then designing one around an EV drive train is trivial for a company the size of Toyota or Honda. By waiting it out, these companies can take advantage of supply chains being developed around batteries and electric motors, while avoiding short term losses like Ford is experiencing. Regarding hybrids, personally I don't do enough city driving to warrant the expense and complexity of a system essentially designed to recover braking energy.
  • Urlik You missed the point. The Feds haven’t changed child labor laws so it is still illegal under Federal law. No state has changed their law so that it goes against a Federal child labor hazardous order like working in a slaughter house either.
  • Plaincraig 1975 Mercury Cougar with the 460 four barrel. My dad bought it new and removed all the pollution control stuff and did a lot of upgrades to the engine (450hp). I got to use it from 1986 to 1991 when I got my Eclipse GSX. The payments and insurance for a 3000GT were going to be too much. No tickets no accidents so far in my many years and miles.My sister learned on a 76 LTD with the 350 two barrel then a Ford Escort but she has tickets (speeding but she has contacts so they get dismissed or fine and no points) and accidents (none her fault)
  • Namesakeone If I were the parent of a teenage daughter, I would want her in an H1 Hummer. It would be big enough to protect her in a crash, too big for her to afford the fuel (and thus keep her home), big enough to intimidate her in a parallel-parking situation (and thus keep her home), and the transmission tunnel would prevent backseat sex.If I were the parent of a teenage son, I would want him to have, for his first wheeled transportation...a ride-on lawnmower. For obvious reasons.
Next