Ford Brings Back Buyouts, Visteon Dumps Pensions on Public

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

It’s been a while since we’ve heard the word “buyout” echoing out of Detroit, as 2008 marked the year in which auto industry employees finally started to be fired like everyone else: without a hefty severance kiss-off. Ford, on the other hand, did not get a shot at free house-cleaning in bankruptcy court, so it’s bringing back buyouts. According to Market Watch, the Blue Oval is offering blue-collar employees a $50,000 lump sum payment and a $25,000 voucher for a new vehicle or another $20,000 lump sum, as well as six months of health insurance coverage. There’s even an extra $40k for workers of “a certain age.” But this being Detroit, employee benefits are either feast or famine. While Ford’s workers are being offered cash for their jobs, the former Ford parts division Visteon announced today that it is seeking to dump pensions for 21,000 retirees in bankruptcy, following Delphi into yet another stealthy yet popular form of indirect automaker bailout.

According to the Detroit News, the pension plans Visteon has asked a bankruptcy judge to drop have a combined shortfall of $544 million, and will result in at least $100m in benefit reductions. The Pension Benefit Guarantee Corporation has not yet approved the benefit dump, nor has Visteon’s bankruptcy judge, but the deal seems likely to go through. Visteon has already been allowed to drop health and life insurance benefits to 6,500 current and future retirees. By assuming these most recently-abandoned pensions, the PBGC would receive a $460 million general unsecured claim and 3.8 percent of Visteon’s new stock in bankruptcy.

But that’s small potatoes for a government safety net that is running a $21 billion deficit for 2008. That includes the assumption of $6.7 billion in Delphi benefits (covering some 70,000 individuals) that were abandoned by the GM spin-off earlier this year. Because both Visteon and Delphi were formerly divisions of Ford and GM respectively and are integral to the viability of their former parents, these pension dumpings are the ugliest, most stealthy elements of 2009’s auto industry bailout. No that you’ll ever see an OEM take responsibility for any of it. Shameful doesn’t even begin to describe it.

The image used in this story is from protests against Visteon UK’s equally shameful bankruptcy

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 8 comments
  • Accs Accs on Dec 21, 2009

    Can I ask a open ended question... Who would "want" to take a buyout from a automaker.. and actually spend 25g on THEIR product. Also.. so is this what happens when the white collared get their benefits and raises back?

  • Detlump Detlump on Dec 21, 2009

    Don't forget that buyouts are not tax exempt, so take that $50K and subtract taxes, you are around $35K. Tuition at a decent school, not UM, is around $500-700/credit hour. With other living expenses, that is not going to last long. The bailout should be conditional on honoring all employer obligations toward employees, union and non-union. Otherwise, it makes more sense to fold up these companies and just give the bailout money right to the employees. Or just nationalize them, clear out the board, and zero out the shareholders. Why pay out unemployment, at least have the workers do something rather than sit at home.

  • Lorenzo Why are all these devices being invented, that take the driving out of driving? Is it because there are too many people with driver's licenses who should be taking taxi's and public transportation?
  • Lorenzo HEH. Owning an EV startup is like the old joke: Want to become a millionaire? Start as a billionaire.I'll take the mansion, preferably in an urban area, with land for expansion. Then I'd turn it into a boutique hotel. Then I'd sell it and live in a beach house on a secluded cove.
  • Redapple2 $1800 destination charge$2400 freight. Ford. Rape is illegal. You may not bend me over the table.What is an A/C charge/fee? Is it what i think it is?
  • MrIcky The ranger raptor is just simply better if you actually want to go off road, and it's only 60% of the price.
  • FreedMike Just the thing for big city driving! It's easy to park, easy on gas, and there's nothing like unleashing the 700 hp beast in bumper to bumper traffic on the Dan Ryan. (Seriously, I'm finding it almost depressing to own a performance car in a place where you can use its' performance maybe 10% of the time.)
Next