Homeland Security Now Combating Street Takeovers

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Homeland Security was reportedly involved in stopping a street takeover in Conroe, Texas, after a prior event became violent when the police arrived. The takeover occurred in the wake of the Lone Star Throwdown, a truck-focused automotive meetup, with organizers complaining about the trend in the aftermath.


According to The Drive, news about the takeover started circulating even before the Lone Star Throwdown had concluded. A subset of attendees were planning to block off a stretch of road as people were leaving on February 25th and the organizers were worried that it would reflect badly on them. There were rumors that the contract for next year's show was at risk of being canceled as a result of bad actors. Noticing vendors from the show were complaining via social media, the Montgomery County Office of Homeland Security and Emergency Management arranged a meeting with promoters for March 6th.


From The Drive:


In the meantime, support for the show poured in from everywhere. Vendors and longtime fans of LST petitioned law enforcement to allow the 2025 show to go on as planned, giving specific details of how the event isn't the problem—the people involved in the takeover are. A podcast interview with showrunners Lonnie Ford, Todd Hendrex, and Jarrod Dunahoo was posted live early this week, discussing the situation.
"Nothing happened at the event," Hendrex said on the C10 Talk Podcast. "The event went smoothly. To sit here and say we had almost 30,000 spectators, that is crazy.
"We grow with the show and make changes as we go along. Nothing happened at the event," Hendrex continued. "The things that are out of our control, that are having our contract pulled from us is the after-meet, the after-parties, the takeovers — whatever you want to call them. I'm not saying it's wrong to go meet in the parking lot; we've all done it our whole life. But the body cam footage I was able to see from some of these officers made me mad."
The footage Hendrex is talking about allegedly shows people stealing mobility karts from a local Kroger, putting their hands on officers, and serious property destruction. Burnouts carried on past the pavement and through the businesses' landscaping, obliterating more grass and greenery than black tire rubber. There were also people urinating on patrol units and attempting to free an individual who was in custody from the back of the cop car.


One could argue that street takeovers and illicit behavior have long been an essential part of automotive culture throughout history. Drifting never would have become popular had Japanese fans not bothered to block access to ensure drivers could make clean attempts on public roads. American drag racing was likewise limited to the streets until someone realized there was money to be made in building private strips. But modern street takeovers are typically defined by pure spectacle and unbridled stupidity.


They can go beyond your typical automotive hooliganism by blocking off busy intersections in the middle of cities so attendees can perform donuts and burnouts. These are hardly structured events and often devolve into large numbers of people showing while violent confrontations between commuters and individuals trying to block the road take place in the background. Stunts may also incorporate people riding atop moving vehicles or seeing how close they can get to the action to take video. But these aren’t structured events even in the most abstract sense, with there being a surplus of video evidence showcasing serious injuries and vehicle collisions.


Worse still, things can continue to decline when police arrive. Drivers often attempt to flee and crowds sometimes attack squad cars until officers decide to retreat. Both have resulted in large numbers of people being struck by vehicles, including police cars, sometimes fatally.


Despite originally being a counterterrorism agency formed in the panic following the World Trade Center attacks on September 11th, 2001, Homeland Security has become a catch-all federal policing agency. These days it’s stated purpose “covers everything from counterterrorism to the Nation's maritime and border security, from protection of our national leaders to coordinating the federal government's response to natural disasters.”


While it’s inarguable that there have been street takeovers so egregious that they likely necessitated aggressive policing, the general response from authorities has been to pursue a zero tolerance policy. Lesser events set further away from the public are being treated with the same level of scrutiny as the worst examples. Now we have federal agencies getting involved.


Lone Star Throwdown reported a productive meeting with local Homeland Security agents and said they were able to secure their contract for 2025. However, the agreement came with the caveat that there will be absolutely no tolerance for hooliganism or illegal activities. It’s assumed there will be a heavier than usual police presence to ensure that remains the case.


Frankly the LST takeover was a middling example based off the available video evidence. It's probably not something you'd want to see a lot of in your own neighborhood and there was some isolated violence. But the automotive carnage (mostly burnouts) was primarily limited to nearby parking lot and the situation never saw the kind of mass insanity that one normally thinks of when they hear the term "street takeover."


"I get that the outside community, when they look at it as a whole, [they believe] they're there because of us, which I get. But they're not," Hendrex said. "When I scoured through all of the videos, we only found three to four who had [event] registrations that were doing stupid stuff."


Navigating this aspect of car culture is going to be a difficult tightrope for everyone to walk. Event organizers and vendors need to look like they’re not throwing their customers under the bus while also appeasing local communities that are likely to look down on them. Meanwhile, the police need to find some way of preventing the worst kind of street takeovers without taking a scattershot approach that ropes in every person that squeals their tires. Automotive enthusiasts already have a contentious relationship with the police and the cops are going to need their help to discourage bad actors if there’s any chance of reducing the severity of takeover culture.


[Image: Eli Glover/YouTube]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 27 comments
  • Mike Bradley Mike Bradley on Mar 09, 2024

    The people living and working near a takeover don't have "fun." Frequent sale and installation of tires should be penalized by loss of license and registration. Some places buy and scrap old cars; police could store them instead to block the streets around a takeover. Rewards for photos of cars participating in takeovers. Drone photos of cars. SWAT teams seize cars, not regular police.

    • Jeff Jeff on Mar 10, 2024

      Agree people living and working near a takeover are not the ones having fun but they are the ones paying the taxes and having to put up with takeovers. Seems some on this site think this is acceptable but then they either don't live in an area that is being taken over or they are the ones doing the takeover. Probably the threat to take the cars involved and crush them would be enough to discourage many from participating especially after a few cars have been crushed. Maybe post a video of the vehicles confiscated and show them being crushed that would be a deterrent for many. Racing on an isolated road is one thing but taking over a main road and racing on a main road with traffic is another thing and should not be allowed. This is not Mad Max.

      If this is a peaceful blocking of a road for an event with permission of the local authorities and notifying those that live and work in the area then that is different. If that were the situation then local law enforcement should be present to make sure there is no threat or illegal activities. The alleged "take over" covered in this article appears to have started as a show with vendors with the intention of not breaking any laws but it got out of hand with theft and property damage. The only way I could see this event would be allowed to happen in the future would be to guarantee security to control those who get out of hand and break laws. Also rent some port o potties to make sure people don't do their business where they shouldn't.


  • MrIcky MrIcky on Mar 11, 2024

    The never ending cycle: Street Racing> Build or Open up a racetrack and invite people to do it legally> New Housing development says venue too loud and closes it> Street Racing.


    Just got my camping sorted for watching the Sun Valley Tour de Force. Rich people do it right. July 18-20, 2024

  • Bouzouki Cadillac (aka GM!!) made so many mistakes over the past 40 years, right up to today, one could make a MBA course of it. Others have alluded to them, there is not enough room for me to recite them in a flowing, cohesive manner.Cadillac today is literally a tarted-up Chevrolet. They are nice cars, and the "aura" of the Cadillac name still works on several (mostly female) consumers who are not car enthusiasts.The CT4 and CT5 offer superlative ride and handling, and even performance--but, it is wrapped in sheet metal that (at least I think) looks awful, with (still) sub-par interiors. They are niche cars. They are the last gasp of the Alpha platform--which I have been told by people close to it, was meant to be a Pontiac "BMW 3-series". The bankruptcy killed Pontiac, but the Alpha had been mostly engineered, so it was "Cadillac-ized" with the new "edgy" CTS styling.Most Cadillacs sold are crossovers. The most profitable "Cadillac" is the Escalade (note that GM never jack up the name on THAT!).The question posed here is rather irrelevant. NO ONE has "a blank check", because GM (any company or corporation) does not have bottomless resources.Better styling, and superlative "performance" (by that, I mean being among the best in noise, harshness, handling, performance, reliablity, quality) would cost a lot of money.Post-bankruptcy GM actually tried. No one here mentioned GM's effort to do just that: the "Omega" platform, aka CT6.The (horribly misnamed) CT6 was actually a credible Mercedes/Lexus competitor. I'm sure it cost GM a fortune to develop (the platform was unique, not shared with any other car. The top-of-the-line ORIGINAL Blackwing V8 was also unique, expensive, and ultimately...very few were sold. All of this is a LOT of money).I used to know the sales numbers, and my sense was the CT6 sold about HALF the units GM projected. More importantly, it sold about half to two thirds the volume of the S-Class (which cost a lot more in 201x)Many of your fixed cost are predicated on volume. One way to improve your business case (if the right people want to get the Green Light) is to inflate your projected volumes. This lowers the unit cost for seats, mufflers, control arms, etc, and makes the vehicle more profitable--on paper.Suppliers tool up to make the number of parts the carmaker projects. However, if the volume is less than expected, the automaker has to make up the difference.So, unfortunately, not only was the CT6 an expensive car to build, but Cadillac's weak "brand equity" limited how much GM could charge (and these were still pricey cars in 2016-18, a "base" car was ).Other than the name, the "Omega" could have marked the starting point for Cadillac to once again be the standard of the world. Other than the awful name (Fleetwood, Elegante, Paramount, even ParAMOUR would be better), and offering the basest car with a FOUR cylinder turbo on the base car (incredibly moronic!), it was very good car and a CREDIBLE Mercedes S-Class/Lexus LS400 alternative. While I cannot know if the novel aluminum body was worth the cost (very expensive and complex to build), the bragging rights were legit--a LARGE car that was lighter, but had good body rigidity. No surprise, the interior was not the best, but the gap with the big boys was as close as GM has done in the luxury sphere.Mary Barra decided that profits today and tomorrow were more important than gambling on profits in 2025 and later. Having sunk a TON of money, and even done a mid-cycle enhancement, complete with the new Blackwing engine (which copied BMW with the twin turbos nestled in the "V"!), in fall 2018 GM announced it was discontinuing the car, and closing the assembly plant it was built in. (And so you know, building different platforms on the same line is very challenging and considerably less efficient in terms of capital and labor costs than the same platform, or better yet, the same model).So now, GM is anticipating that, as the car market "goes electric" (if you can call it that--more like the Federal Government and EU and even China PUSHING electric cars), they can make electric Cadillacs that are "prestige". The Cadillac Celestique is the opening salvo--$340,000. We will see how it works out.
  • Lynn Joiner Lynn JoinerJust put 2,000 miles on a Chevy Malibu rental from Budget, touring around AZ, UT, CO for a month. Ran fine, no problems at all, little 1.7L 4-cylinder just sipped fuel, and the trunk held our large suitcases easily. Yeah, I hated looking up at all the huge FWD trucks blowing by, but the Malibu easily kept up on the 80 mph Interstate in Utah. I expect a new one would be about a third the cost of the big guys. It won't tow your horse trailer, but it'll get you to the store. Why kill it?
  • Lynn Joiner Just put 2,000 miles on a Chevy Malibu rental from Budget, touring around AZ, UT, CO for a month. Ran fine, no problems at all, little 1.7L 4-cylinder just sipped fuel, and the trunk held our large suitcases easily. Yeah, I hated looking up at all the huge FWD trucks blowing by, but the Malibu easily kept up on the 80 mph Interstate in Utah. I expect a new one would be about a third the cost of the big guys. It won't tow your horse trailer, but it'll get you to the store. Why kill it?
  • Ollicat I am only speaking from my own perspective so no need to bash me if you disagree. I already know half or more of you will disagree with me. But I think the traditional upscale Cadillac buyer has traditionally been more conservative in their political position. My suggestion is to make Cadillac separate from GM and make them into a COMPANY, not just cars. And made the company different from all other car companies by promoting conservative causes and messaging. They need to build up a whole aura about the company and appeal to a large group of people that are really kind of sick of the left and sending their money that direction. But yes, I also agree about many of your suggestions above about the cars too. No EVs. But at this point, what has Cadillac got to lose by separating from GM completely and appealing to people with money who want to show everyone that they aren't buying the leftist Kook-Aid.
  • Jkross22 Cadillac's brand is damaged for the mass market. Why would someone pay top dollar for what they know is a tarted up Chevy? That's how non-car people see this.
Next