Dodge Releases First of Umpteen ‘Last Call’ Challengers

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

You may have heard that this is the last model year for the Charger and Challenger as we know them today. As a send-off, Dodge is creating a yaffle of special editions based on past packages or trims – along with allocating the entire year’s run at once. The latter is surely causing dealer principals to talk into their morning hit of cocaine caffeine. 


Here’s the first – a Dodge Challenger Shakedown.



This is the first of seven special editions, to be precise, cars that won’t be available for ordering but instead slipped into the system like Willy Wonka’s golden tickets. Unlike those tix, however, Dodge is committing to publicly listing the dealers which have earned allocation for these cars, a move which will surely send collectors scrambling.


The ‘23 Dodge Challenger Shakedown recreates the Dodge Shakedown Challenger concept which was shown at the 2016 SEMA Show in Vegas. It follows the original’s black-and-red interior and exterior appearance, though ditching some colorways in favor of either Destroyer Grey or Pitch Black. To be specific, 500 of the former will appears as R/T Scat Packs with the latter as 500 R/T Scat Pack Widebody trims. They’re all Shakers, too. Cue up the Barrett-Jackson auction patter in a few years.

All the Shakedown models, wide and otherwise, will come with the R/T Plus Group, Tech Package which includes satnav, carbon/suede interior materials, and a Dynamics Package. The latter shows up in the form of red six-piston Brembo-branded brakes which are of use in a car this heavy. Typical badging alterations are present including different grille jewelry and the Shakedown stripe which traces an outline of the aforementioned Shaker hood as the stripe wends its way over the car. No power increases were announced for the 392 cubic-inch V8.


Half a dozen special-edition Challenger and Charger models will be revealed through September 21, 2022. The seventh and final 2023 Dodge model is planned to be shown at the 2022 SEMA Show in early November. Allocation, when it is finalized later this autumn, will be posted on DodgeGarage.com


[Images: Stellantis]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
6 of 19 comments
  • MaintenanceCosts MaintenanceCosts on Aug 26, 2022

    All the special editions in the world can't make these into good-looking cars.

    • See 3 previous
    • ToolGuy ToolGuy on Aug 29, 2022

      "It needed Jenny Craig and more glass"

      The car got heavier and outward visibility got worse after your test drive? That's weird.

      (Or were you just not paying attention before you signed the papers?)

  • Secret Hi5 Secret Hi5 on Aug 29, 2022

    "So, I walked into a Dodge dealership and asked for a Shakedown . . . "

  • Varezhka I have still yet to see a Malibu on the road that didn't have a rental sticker. So yeah, GM probably lost money on every one they sold but kept it to boost their CAFE numbers.I'm personally happy that I no longer have to dread being "upgraded" to a Maxima or a Malibu anymore. And thankfully Altima is also on its way out.
  • Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
  • GregLocock Car companies can only really sell cars that people who are new car buyers will pay a profitable price for. As it turns out fewer and fewer new car buyers want sedans. Large sedans can be nice to drive, certainly, but the number of new car buyers (the only ones that matter in this discussion) are prepared to sacrifice steering and handling for more obvious things like passenger and cargo space, or even some attempt at off roading. We know US new car buyers don't really care about handling because they fell for FWD in large cars.
  • Slavuta Why is everybody sweating? Like sedans? - go buy one. Better - 2. Let CRV/RAV rust on the dealer lot. I have 3 sedans on the driveway. My neighbor - 2. Neighbors on each of our other side - 8 SUVs.
  • Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.
Next