2023 Chevrolet Colorado Earns New Trim Plus Silverado’s Clothes – and Engine

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

Detroit’s truck makers love beating each other over the head. Witness the power wars happening at one end of the table, endless innovations in the cargo box at the other, plus the current obsession with off-road one-upmanship. And that’s even before all hands start cranking out electric trucks packing a bazillion horsepower.


The midsize segment is not immune. Chevrolet has introduced the ’23 Colorado, a truck with upgrades suitable for keeping up with (and passing) the Joneses. Oh – and they also pulled a trick taken from the Book of Detroit: Take the engine from a larger machine and stuff it up the nose of a smaller one.


Gone are the 3.6-liter V6 and small-displacement diesel engines. In their place is a turbocharged 2.7L available in three states of tune and lashed to an 8-speed automatic. Base and LT trims will get 237 horsepower and 259 lb-ft of torque, while the Z71 and new Trail Boss are the recipients of 310 hp/390 lb-ft (this is optional on WT and LT). Rounding out the trio is a further 40 lb-ft bump in torque for the almighty ZR2 off-roader. It’ll escape no one’s notice that GM doesn’t refer to this mill as a ‘four cylinder’ in any of its marketing bumfs for Colorado or Silverado.


Styling is tweaked up front to provide angrier headlamps and a face full of grille. Tail lights now mimic those found on big-bro Silverado, though the doors and cab itself look to largely mirror last year’s truck. To these jaundiced eyes, the ‘Colorado’ door script – called the paragraph by many in the biz – is positioned far too north on the metal surface and would be better served either closer to the rocker panels or not applied at all. 

Speaking of cab configurations, Colorado will now be available only as a Crew Cab with a 5’2” box; the Extended Cab configuration is gone and so is the Crew’s long box option. It’s very likely the EC’s take rate was low, while the need for a longer frame for a CC long box was probably nixed by nerdy accountants. Overall length doesn’t change much from the existing long box Crew, though its wheelbase is over 3 inches longer thanks to a front axle being pushed forward.

New cabins await those who climb aboard, binning an interior that was getting long in the tooth. An 11.3-inch touchscreen serves as the focal point, dishing up audio information plus a host of camera views. A suite of trailering tech is available, again taken from Silverado, and the truck maxes out at 7,700lbs towing capacity depending on spec. Displays for g-force and wheel slip are shown as part of a Baja readout, while the Overlanding readout jumps on current trends to offer altitude and GPS locations. Those round outboard vents evoke the Camaro, at least to this author’s myopic eyes.


The dandy ZR2 trim remains the big gun, with nearly 11 inches of ground clearance and nifty Multimatic DSSV shocks (now outboard on the rear) making it a great fit for off-road duty. Slotting in below this trim is a new Trail Boss, a truck that retains the ZR2’s wide stance but trades away the DSSVs for simpler suspenders. A new Desert Boss package (one too many bosses?) is available to layer on top of the ZR2 and brings beadlock-capable wheels and a roof-mounted light bar.

One notable new option is a cargo hold built into the tailgate, accessible once the ‘gate is lowered. Two tabs rotate out of the way permitting this cubby’s lid to swing open and reveal a 4-inch deep space great for small tools and a set of jumper cables. This truck-loving author will take all the covered storage he can get.


Production for the 2023 Chevrolet Colorado will kick off in the first half of 2023 at GM’s plant in Missouri. Pricing and additional details will be released closer to the start of production.

[Images: GM]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by   subscribing to our newsletter.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 27 comments
  • Eng_alvarado90 Eng_alvarado90 on Aug 10, 2022

    This is not something I'd take in a Cadillac but feels about right in a mid-sized pickup. Again if 8t works on the 1500s why not in the Colorado?


    No bot whatsoever, either you haven't logged in lately or have no clue

  • Johnster Johnster on Aug 19, 2022

    Not feelin' it. The traditional unreliability of turbo engines is a big turn-off, especially in a work truck that (I hope) you'd want to keep on the road for 200,000 miles or more without having major repairs.

    • Jeff S Jeff S on Aug 29, 2022

      Agree but the manufacturers don't want you to drive your truck 200k miles. Don't hate the new Colorado but if I were buying a midsize 4 door pickup it would be the Frontier with the V-6. Wasn't that enthused when the new Ranger only came with a turbo 4 but at least for now the Ranger offers an extended cab. I am happy with my Maverick and don't need or want a larger truck.


  • Varezhka I have still yet to see a Malibu on the road that didn't have a rental sticker. So yeah, GM probably lost money on every one they sold but kept it to boost their CAFE numbers.I'm personally happy that I no longer have to dread being "upgraded" to a Maxima or a Malibu anymore. And thankfully Altima is also on its way out.
  • Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
  • GregLocock Car companies can only really sell cars that people who are new car buyers will pay a profitable price for. As it turns out fewer and fewer new car buyers want sedans. Large sedans can be nice to drive, certainly, but the number of new car buyers (the only ones that matter in this discussion) are prepared to sacrifice steering and handling for more obvious things like passenger and cargo space, or even some attempt at off roading. We know US new car buyers don't really care about handling because they fell for FWD in large cars.
  • Slavuta Why is everybody sweating? Like sedans? - go buy one. Better - 2. Let CRV/RAV rust on the dealer lot. I have 3 sedans on the driveway. My neighbor - 2. Neighbors on each of our other side - 8 SUVs.
  • Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.
Next