Piston Slap: Leaking Like A…Santa Fe?

Sajeev Mehta
by Sajeev Mehta
Luke writes:

I have an ’09 Hyundai Santa Fe, 3.3L, with 117,000 km (73,000 miles). It’s losing oil from a leaking timing chain cover gasket at a rate of one litre per 1,400 km or so. The repair is estimated to be around $1,500. We have this vehicle because we have three young children (ages 4, 2, and 6 months) and the Santa Fe is one of the few that fit three car seats across one row safely and easily, and was within our budget.

I’ve only owned the vehicle for a year. What do you think I should do? Pay for the repair, just keep adding oil, or look for a different vehicle?

Sajeev answers:

I was gonna suggest addressing the timing cover oil leak during a timing belt change, but that applies to the 2.7L Delta, not the (timing chain equipped) 3.3L Lambda. So much for two birds, one stone!

The $1,500 quote sounds a bit looney, until you see the work involved. Dropping the front subframe makes sense, considering the engine’s location in relation to those narrow frame rails.

Maybe someone will do it for less … but not much less!

I checked a few online valuation tools: your Santa Fe (good condition) is worth CAD $8,000-9,000 on a place like Craigslist Kijiji. Using Google’s currency calculator (more approximations) and even if you get a deeper discount, the repair’s gonna account for 15%-ish of market value. That’s a rather big piece of the pie! And I’m not feelin’ it, son.

It’s not like you’ve had this rig since new, so what else is around the corner? New tires or brakes? EGR issues?

I’d add oil until you find a medium brown metallic Crown Vic suitable replacement. Sure, I pontificate on Panther Love far too often, but they’ll fit your budget — and (probably) all three car seats.

[Image: Hyundai, Sajeev Mehta]

Send your queries to sajeev@thetruthaboutcars.com. Spare no details and ask for a speedy resolution if you’re in a hurry…but be realistic, and use your make/model specific forums instead of TTAC for more timely advice.

Sajeev Mehta
Sajeev Mehta

More by Sajeev Mehta

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 148 comments
  • HotPotato HotPotato on Feb 23, 2019

    I should say: a lot depends on how much you like the car. If you love it, you'll keep it even when you shouldn't. If you hate it, you'll trade it even when you shouldn't. And on how much you trust its future: e.g. in my experience German cars are durable but not reliable (they'll look and work like new as long as you keep spending dough replacing things), Japanese cars are reliable but not durable (they'll keep running fine but normal parking lot use will dimple the car like an asteroid belt and the exhaust system will rust to dust every couple of years), and Korean and American cars are neither (best if you like to lease or trade often). But I realize those are pretty gross generalizations, especially these days.

  • Lightspeed Lightspeed on Feb 24, 2019

    Trade it for whatever 4Runner you can afford

  • 1995 SC The sad thing is GM tends to kill cars when they get them right, so this was probably a pretty good car
  • Mason Had this identical car as a 17 year old in the late 90's. What a ball of fun, one of many I wish I still had.
  • FinnEss At my age, sedans are difficult to get into without much neck and hip adjustment.I apologize sincerely but that is just the way it is. A truck is my ride of choice.Pronto
  • Ajla The market for sedans is weaker than it once was but I think some of you are way overstating the situation and I disagree that the sales numbers show sedans are some niche thing that full line manufacturers should ignore. There are still a sizeable amount of sales. This isn't sports car volume. So far this year the Camry and Civic are selling in the top 10, with the Corolla in 11 and the Accord, Sentra, and Model 3 in the top 20. And sedan volume is off it's nadir from a few years ago with many showing decent growth over the last two years, growth that is outpacing utilities. Cancelling all sedans now seems more of an error than back when Ford did it.
  • Duties The U.S . would have enough energy to satisfy our needs and export energy if JoeBama hadn’t singlehandedly shut down U.S. energy exploration and production. Furthermore, at current rates of consumption, the U.S. has over two centuries of crude oil, https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/energy/exclusive-current-rates-consumption-us-has-more-two-centuries-oil-report.Imagine we lived in a world where all cars were EV's. And then along comes a new invention: the Internal Combustion Engine.Think how well they would sell. A vehicle HALF the weight, HALF the price that would cause only a quarter of the damage to the road. A vehicle that could be refueled in 1/10th the time, with a range of 4 times the distance in all weather conditions. One that does not rely on the environmentally damaging use of non-renewable rare earth elements to power it, and uses far less steel and other materials. A vehicle that could carry and tow far heavier loads. And is less likely to explode in your garage in the middle of the night and burn down your house with you in it. And ran on an energy source that is readily extracted with hundreds of years known supply.Just think how excited people would be for such technology. It would sell like hot cakes, with no tax credits! Whaddaya think? I'd buy one.
Next