2019 Lexus ES: Luxo-Avalon Reveals Its Pricing

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Long regarded as the pinnacle of worry-free premium transport, the Lexus ES throws off its dowdy clothes for 2019 in favor of a new, sportier look. It’s a makeover shared with its platform-mate, the Toyota Avalon, and the two large sedans both call dibs on the same V6 engine, four-cylinder hybrid powertrain, and eight-speed and continuously variable automatics.

The mission of this ES is not just to compel existing owners to return to the dealer for another go-around. It wants fresh blood — hence the new sheetmetal and addition of an F Sport model. To help keep both sets of buyers in its good books, Lexus hasn’t gone wild with the pricing. One version actually sees a price decrease for 2019.

Base sticker for a 2019 ES 350 is $39,500, sans delivery, representing a $550 uptick over the 2018 model. For this price, buyers gain a 3.5-liter V6 generating 302 horsepower and 267 lb-ft of torque, harnessed through the eight-speed. That’s an increase of 34 hp and 19 lb-ft over the outgoing model. Lexus claims combined fuel economy rises 2 mpg (to 26 mpg), helped by the retirement of the previous-gen model’s six-speed automatic.

Should buyers be of the green persuasion, the hybrid ES 300h model drops in price by $510, stickering for $41,310. This variant also sees power and economy increases. Output from the 2.5-liter four-cylinder/electric motor combo rises to 215 hp, while combined fuel economy jumps 4 mpg ( to 44 mpg). While driving the model’s Avalon sibling in April, this combo proved decently powerful and gratifyingly smooth.

As sedan sales aren’t what they used to be, Lexus’ reworking of the ES went beyond simply smoothing out its conservative body. Buyers afraid of rear- or all-wheel drive can now spring for an F Sport model. This brings mildly more aggressive looks and Adaptive Variable Suspension (AVS) on board, complimenting the front-drive-only sedan’s new multi-link rear. Metallic cabin trim and other appearance flourishes hide the fact that the F Sport’s powertrain remains the same as the stock ES 350, though you’ll pick up a wider variety of drive modes.

As we all know, ES owners are known for wanting to fine-tune their steering feel, throttle response, damper stiffness, and shift points. The ES F Sport rings in at $44,035 before delivery.

The 2019 Lexus ES family arrives at dealers in September. Over the first half of 2018, ES sales fell 8.7 percent compared to last year, though it’s still — by far — the Lexus division’s best-selling passenger car. After reaching a post-recession high water mark of 72,508 U.S. sales in 2014, ES volume fell to 51,398 units in 2017.

[Image: Lexus]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 40 comments
  • Varezhka I have still yet to see a Malibu on the road that didn't have a rental sticker. So yeah, GM probably lost money on every one they sold but kept it to boost their CAFE numbers.I'm personally happy that I no longer have to dread being "upgraded" to a Maxima or a Malibu anymore. And thankfully Altima is also on its way out.
  • Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
  • GregLocock Car companies can only really sell cars that people who are new car buyers will pay a profitable price for. As it turns out fewer and fewer new car buyers want sedans. Large sedans can be nice to drive, certainly, but the number of new car buyers (the only ones that matter in this discussion) are prepared to sacrifice steering and handling for more obvious things like passenger and cargo space, or even some attempt at off roading. We know US new car buyers don't really care about handling because they fell for FWD in large cars.
  • Slavuta Why is everybody sweating? Like sedans? - go buy one. Better - 2. Let CRV/RAV rust on the dealer lot. I have 3 sedans on the driveway. My neighbor - 2. Neighbors on each of our other side - 8 SUVs.
  • Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.
Next