Two New Models Coming to Save GM Korea: Report

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

The home of America’s smallest General Motors vehicles is bleeding sales and cash, forcing the automaker into harsh measures in an attempt to save its South Korean operation. Many fear last week’s plant closure announcement is just the beginning of an eventual exodus from the Korean market. There’s three remaining assembly plants, each sitting on shaky financial ground.

Today brings encouraging news, however. Two reports paint a picture of GM in triage mode, doing everything in its power to stem the bleeding — of both money and customers.

According to Reuters, a South Korean lawmaker claims GM International president Barry Engle promised members of parliament two new vehicles in a Tuesday morning meeting. South Korea owns a 17-percent stake in GM Korea, and it isn’t clear whether the product promise hinges on government support.

With 2,000 jobs already in jeopardy at GM’s soon-to-be shuttered Gunsan plant, and worker unrest growing, government intervention seems inescapable. On Monday, Reuters reports, South Korean President Moon Jae-in told his administration to assist in economic development efforts in the manufacturing region surrounding the plant.

Moon said the government will “aggressively” pursue these measures, which may include designating Gunsan as an “employment crisis area.” Such a label would allow for cheap business loans and support for laid-off workers.

On Tuesday morning, another Reuters report, citing four sources close to the matter, claimed GM plans to erase $2.2 billion in debt by converting it to equity. This would be done in exchange for “financial support” and tax benefits from Seoul. One source says GM wants $1 billion in support from South Korea, while another claims GM demanded its factory sites be labelled “foreign investment zones,” thus making them eligible for tax breaks for a period of seven years.

Though GM Korea’s domestic sales have fallen severely, it still exports vehicles to markets around the world, including North America. In his meeting with lawmakers, Engle said he’d like to see production continue at its current rate (roughly half a million vehicles per year). The Chevrolet Spark, Sonic, Trax, and Buick Encore all hail from South Korean plants.

[Image: General Motors]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
8 of 13 comments
  • Deanst Deanst on Feb 20, 2018

    When did sonic production move from the u.s.?

    • See 3 previous
    • Festiboi Festiboi on Feb 20, 2018

      The U.S. market Chevy Sonic is still assembled in Orion, Michigan. That’s one of the little car’s claims to fame. But overseas market Sonics, and the identical Holden Barinas, are built in Korea

  • TwoBelugas TwoBelugas on Feb 20, 2018

    I know some immigrants from Korea, and the ones that do have Hyundai or Kias, as soon as they have enough money they start buying Lexus's and MBs. Some of them go as far as not wanting Korean brand cars altogether. Let GM Korea fail, it's not like Koreans as a whole buy all that many non-Korean brand cars anyway even if the GM cars are made there.

    • See 1 previous
    • Hank Hank on Feb 20, 2018

      According to my tour guide in Seoul last summer, 85% of cars sold in S Korea are domestically produced. To abandon the factory is to abandon the market.

  • Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
  • GregLocock Car companies can only really sell cars that people who are new car buyers will pay a profitable price for. As it turns out fewer and fewer new car buyers want sedans. Large sedans can be nice to drive, certainly, but the number of new car buyers (the only ones that matter in this discussion) are prepared to sacrifice steering and handling for more obvious things like passenger and cargo space, or even some attempt at off roading. We know US new car buyers don't really care about handling because they fell for FWD in large cars.
  • Slavuta Why is everybody sweating? Like sedans? - go buy one. Better - 2. Let CRV/RAV rust on the dealer lot. I have 3 sedans on the driveway. My neighbor - 2. Neighbors on each of our other side - 8 SUVs.
  • Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.
  • Wjtinfwb Not proud of what Stellantis is rolling out?
Next