Adventures in Marketing: Lincoln Hires a New Ad Agency

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

Another day, another chance for this author to write about the Lincoln brand. This time, we learn of the company looking outside the WPP ad agency for help marketing its new Lincolns.

The Glass House is not ditching its longtime partner. Instead, it’s turning to the Wasserman Media Group and their Laundry Service ad shop based in New York to handle social media for a new campaign for the redesigned 2018 Lincoln Navigator SUV.

According to the industry website Ad Age, WPP established Hudson Rouge in 2012 to handle the Lincoln luxury brand. A Lincoln spokesperson confirmed with Ad Age that Hudson Rouge—known for Lincoln’s Matthew McConaughey ads— will continue to work with Lincoln, including on the Navigator campaign.

Laundry Service’s content-creation role on the campaign is significant, according to people familiar with the matter. Ford has worked with WPP since the mid-1940s, so any amount of advertising work shoveled elsewhere is worth noting.

As we know, hiring a new ad company is not the only change at Lincoln. After 10 years of trying to make the MKNothing naming scheme work, the brand is starting to move back into the realm of good sense by deploying real names for most of its new or restyled product.

Ford, as a whole, spent upwards of $2.3 billion on marketing in America last year, with receipts of over $4 billion for advertising expenditures around the globe. That puts the Blue Oval in the top 10 of the nation’s largest advertisers.

You’ll recall that recently-minted CEO Jim Hackett wants to trim spending, announcing plans to slash $14 billion in costs over the next five years. Kumar Galhotra, president of the Lincoln brand, was recently tapped as the company’s global chief marketing officer, though he also retained his role at Lincoln. Until this shuffle, global marketing was overseen by Stephen Odell, who announced his retirement after a 37-year career at Ford.

It doesn’t sound as if the Matthew McConaughey ads are going away, given that the new ad agency is – for now – only responsible for a small portion of the content for a single model in the Lincoln lineup. Love ‘em or hate ‘em – the McConaughey ads at least have people talking.

So long as Lincoln keeps getting parodied on YouTube, the company should continue with the McConaughey content. Imitation is, after all, the sincerest form of flattery.

[Image: Lincoln Motor Company/ YouTube]

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 8 comments
  • Gasser Gasser on Nov 30, 2017

    Social media campaign? The demographic that Lincoln serves can barely handle email. Big news: kids on instagram and Facebook can barely afford a beater, no less a Lincoln. Every Lincoln I see here in L.A. Is driven by someone older than me and I'm 70!!! I'll give you a tip: put the Lincoln ads on the Obit page.

  • 87 Morgan 87 Morgan on Dec 01, 2017

    If only GM would follow suit. I find their ads to be the most uninspired of them all.

  • Varezhka I have still yet to see a Malibu on the road that didn't have a rental sticker. So yeah, GM probably lost money on every one they sold but kept it to boost their CAFE numbers.I'm personally happy that I no longer have to dread being "upgraded" to a Maxima or a Malibu anymore. And thankfully Altima is also on its way out.
  • Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
  • GregLocock Car companies can only really sell cars that people who are new car buyers will pay a profitable price for. As it turns out fewer and fewer new car buyers want sedans. Large sedans can be nice to drive, certainly, but the number of new car buyers (the only ones that matter in this discussion) are prepared to sacrifice steering and handling for more obvious things like passenger and cargo space, or even some attempt at off roading. We know US new car buyers don't really care about handling because they fell for FWD in large cars.
  • Slavuta Why is everybody sweating? Like sedans? - go buy one. Better - 2. Let CRV/RAV rust on the dealer lot. I have 3 sedans on the driveway. My neighbor - 2. Neighbors on each of our other side - 8 SUVs.
  • Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.
Next