Volvo Revives Subscription Scheme for California

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Volvo Cars is reintroducing its subscription model in California, despite having previously gotten in trouble for violating the state's franchise laws. While the automotive industry has attempted to hype the premise for years, vehicle subscription services haven't gotten much love from consumers and tend to exist in a legal gray zone that makes regulators uneasy. We even bashed them years ago for being one of the most expensive ways to get into an automobile, with only a modicum of features to help rationalize the added expenditure.


Early versions of subscription plans functioned like a lease, allowing customers to pay a premium to swap between models. It was effectively like having a permanent rental vehicle that the manufacturer would be willing to exchange once certain conditions were met. Often presented as a luxury service, the logistics of managing such an endeavor turned out to be a real problem for most brands. A lot of these services weren’t profitable and customers were already scrunching their faces at the premise of opting into a more expensive lease with some curious perks about limited vehicle swapping.


This encouraged most manufacturers to abandon their subscription schemes within the last four years. Despite often being touted as luxury experiences (e.g. “Book by Cadillac” and the “Mercedes-Benz Collection”), there simply wasn’t enough interest for the concept to stick around. While German brands have attempted to pivot toward “selling” individual features via subscription – effectively charging customers to rent hardware that’s already been equipped to their vehicles – almost everyone else just trashed the idea.


Volvo is the exception – not that it hasn’t faced challenges of its own.


In 2019, the California New Car Dealers Association complained to the state’s New Motor Vehicle Board that “ Care by Volvo” basically allowed the automaker to circumvent dealerships by allowing customers to order cars directly online. Later that year, the Department of Motor Vehicles launched an investigation and determined that Volvo was deceptively masking leases as subscription services by 2020. The DMV basically said Volvo had to stop what it was doing and had failed to provide adequate information for both dealers and customers.


However, Automotive News recently quoted corporate leadership as saying it’s wholly committed to its subscription program and has even found its way back into California.


"Giving customers the freedom to move in a personal, sustainable and safe way is our mission," Volvo Car’s outgoing CEO (for our market) Anders Gustafsson told the outlet. "Working with our retailer partners to offer the flexibility to do so is one way we are fulfilling our mission."


The rebooted program emerged immediately after the company started taking heat from state regulators and is more in line with what German manufacturers were offering when subscription schemes first started being floated as an idea. It ups the number of eligible models and allows retailers to offer in-stock vehicles to participating customers.


From AN:


"It became clear to us that we needed to provide more differentiation between our current subscription and a lease," Care by Volvo U.S. former chief Peter Wexler told Automotive News following the revamp. "The most natural way to do that was to introduce more flexible terms."
The revised California subscription service is similar to Volvo's program in New York: Customers can choose a vehicle from retailer stock and must secure their own insurance coverage.
Brian Maas, president of the California New Car Dealers Association, said the new Care by Volvo is "significantly different than the earlier iteration, which was found to violate California law by our DMV."
Volvo retailers are the contact point for subscription consumers and are free to price the vehicles, Maas told Automotive News. Also, Volvo won't offer a competing lease product.


"This program was designed to help us capture a new audience and introduce them to the safety, sustainability and technology benefits of driving a new Volvo car," Gustafsson said. "The flexibility and all-inclusive offer conquests customers from other brands, but our vehicles are helping keep them with us."


Volvo has said that the scheme is profitable but has decided against sharing the take rate or how much money it has raked in thus far. While that could mean there’s something to hide, it would be strange for Volvo to stick with the plan if it were an utter failure. Based on how other subscription plans have performed, it doesn’t seem like there’s a lot of hope for Care by Volvo. But the brand’s leadership has said it’s 100 percent committed to it – likely due to the claim that it's bringing in a lot of younger customers that have never tried a Volvo product before.


[Image: meowKa/Shutterstock]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 12 comments
  • ToolGuy ToolGuy on Jan 30, 2023

    "circumvent(ing) dealerships" should be illegal.

    Does "circumventing" mean spending my money there?

  • Chris P Bacon Chris P Bacon on Jan 31, 2023

    Unfortunately the Care by Volvo website doesn't give any pricing information. Only a "Request Information" link that I'm sure feeds you to the nearest dealer and removes any pricing transparency. It might be something I'd be interested in because of the insurance. Anything that lower the cost of having a teen driver in the house is welcome.

  • C-b65792653 I'm starting to wonder about Elon....again!!I see a parallel with Henry Ford who was the wealthiest industrialist at one time. Henry went off on a tangent with the peace ship for WWI, Ford TriMotor, invasive social engineering, etc. Once the economy went bad, the focus fell back to cars. Elon became one of the wealthiest industrialist in the 21st century. Then he went off with the space venture, boring holes in the ground venture, "X" (formerly Twitter), etc, etc, etc. Once Tesla hit a plateau and he realized his EVs were a commodity, he too is focused on his primary money making machine. Yet, I feel Elon is over reacting. Down sizing is the nature of the beast in the auto industry; you can't get around that. But hacking the Super Charger division is like cutting off your own leg. IIRC, GM and Ford were scheduled to sign on to the exclusive Tesla charging format. That would have doubled or tripled his charging opportunity. I wonder what those at the Renaissance Center and the Glass House are thinking now. As alluded to, there's blood in the water and other charging companies will fill the void. I believe other nations have standardized EV charging (EU & China). Elon had the chance to have his charging system as the default in North America. Now, he's dropped the ball. He's lost considerable influence on what the standardized format will eventually be. Tremendous opportunity lost. 🚗🚗🚗
  • Tassos I never used winter tires, and the last two decades I am driving almost only rear wheel drive cars, half of them in MI. I always bought all season tires for them, but the diff between touring and non touring flavors never came up. Does it make even the smallest bit of difference? (I will not read the lengthy article because I believe it does not).
  • Lou_BC ???
  • Lou_BC Mustang sedan? 4 doors? A quarterhorse?Ford nomenclature will become:F Series - Pickups Raptor - performance division Bronco - 4x4 SUV/CUVExplorer - police fleetsMustang- cars
  • Ede65792611 Got one. It was my Dad's and now has 132K on it. I pay my Mercedes guy zillions of dollars to keep it going. But, I do, and he does and it's an excellent vehicle. I've put in the full Android panel for BT handsfree and streaming with a backup cam.
Next