Cadillac Celestiq Restoring Brand's Moxie

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Cadillac has been meticulously stoking the fires of the hype train of the Celestiq to ensure the model has a full head of steam before its debut on July 22nd. The forthcoming flagship model is rumored to become the most expensive product in the luxury brand’s 120-year history and will bring back a level of opulence not seen on American cars since the golden era of the 1950s.

Frankly, it sounds like General Motors may be setting expectations a little high — especially since the last handful of Cadillacs haven’t exactly been able to check the luxury box with the kind of gusto necessary for a nameplate that’s supposed to specialize in providing exactly that. The brand’s best offerings now tend to be focused more on performance than comfort and are accompanied by sporting names that include terms like “Blackwing” and “V.” But that may soon change if the latest teasers of the Cadillac Celestiq are anything to go buy, as the company seems to be returning to its roots.

As an American, it’s not really my place to decide what constitutes good taste. We’re the guys that decided oversized tailfins were the pinnacle of automotive fashion and continued incorporating aeronautical designs into cars until jet aircraft became commonplace and the trend became played out. We like excess, going for broke, mixing concepts, and the kind of outside-the-box thinking that can easily result in abominations when it fails to produce an instant classic. We’re mongrels, often ignoring what others think should be to explore what could be.

In that sense, the Celestiq seems to be decidedly American. Cadillac seems to have thrown in everything but the kitchen sink into the long and impressively low-slung fastback. And who cares whether or not it looks good when there’s so much here to distract you?

Clearly designed to best models like the Tesla Model S and forthcoming Mercedes-Benz EQS, the Celestiq’s interior shares more than a few design cues from both. However, the automaker seems to have continued working on the space until it felt confident it had something better to offer. Cadillac isn’t offering interior features and materials on par with high-end rivals, it’s promising to deliver an interior space that would make super-premium brands like Bugatti envious. Cars will be bespoke, with oodles of customization designed to cater to a clientele with particularly deep pockets.

However, Americans also love a bargain and unless the Celestiq offers Rolls-Royce levels of opulence, it’s unlikely to be a stellar value. Rumor has it that the car will start at an eye-watering $300,000, with each being made to order for individual clients and (at least partially) hand-built at GM’s tech center in Warren, Michigan.

Cadillac is trying to recapture the magic that allowed its namesake to become a proxy for describing engineering excellence in all fields. Considering how good the latest round of teasers look, it may even be putting itself in a good position to accomplish that goal. However, there are a few things working against the brand. For starters, the Lyric EV which foreshadowed the Celestiq has become better known for being an adequate EV with a pleasing design rather than the undeniable champion of the battery-electric crossover segment.

Range is another issue. Cadillac has said that the Celestiq’s range will be “at least” 300 miles per charge, whereas Tesla has examples of the Model S that can surpass 400 miles on a good day. Now, GM could elect to increase that number using a larger battery pack. But we’ve heard the model is already using the 100 kWh pack found on the Lyric — so we’re not expecting it to exceed 312 miles between charging breaks until something larger is available.

Flop or float, it’s going to be very interesting to see the vehicle’s official debut later this month. Cadillac is really going out on a limb to deliver something it believes will be truly special as it preps itself for going entirely electric. Whether that means the brand will begin delivering the kind of ultra-luxury vehicles it was famous for in the 1930s (which sold rather poorly during the Great Depression), replicates the understated beauty and swift technological development of the 1940s, or leans into the over-the-top styling witnessed in the 1950s remains to be seen. But it’s going big with this one and its success (or lack thereof) is likely to influence the marque’s direction for the next few years.

[Images: General Motors]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 46 comments
  • SPPPP SPPPP on Jul 14, 2022

    Cadillac will be stuck in a nightmarish no-man's-land for the next 10 years (if it survives that long). They have improved their gas cars quite a bit in the last 10 years ... but now they are supposed to discontinue them all because they all burn gas. Cadillac said they should be out of gas engines entirely by 2030. Likewise the gas-burning SUVs (the real cash cow) have no EV equivalent yet. Cadillac couldn't manage to sell many examples of a stylish plug-in hybrid at $80k (the CT6). They are not likely to sell many $300k EVs, in my opinion. So where are the EVs?

  • Zerofoo Zerofoo on Jul 15, 2022

    I don’t care how badly GM manages their shareholder’s business so long as we don’t have to bail them out again. I’m sure all 20 of their customers will love these things.

  • MRF 95 T-Bird Whenever I travel and I’m in my rental car I first peruse the FM radio to look for interesting programming. It used to be before the past few decades of media consolidation that if you traveled to an area the local radio stations had a distinct sound and flavor. Now it’s the homogenized stuff from the corporate behemoths. Classic rock, modern “bro dude” country, pop hits of today, oldies etc. Much of it tolerable but pedestrian. The college radio stations and NPR affiliates are comfortable standbys. But what struck me recently is how much more religious programming there was on the FM stations, stuff that used to be relegated to the AM band. You have the fire and brimstone preachers, obviously with a far right political bend. Others geared towards the Latin community. Then there is the happy talk “family radio” “Jesus loves you” as well as the ones featuring the insipid contemporary Christian music. Artists such as Michael W. Smith who is one of the most influential artists in the genre. I find myself yelling at the dashboard “Where’s the freakin Staple singers? The Edwin Hawkins singers? Gospel Aretha? Gospel Elvis? Early Sam Cooke? Jesus era Dylan?” When I’m in my own vehicle I stick with the local college radio station that plays a diverse mix of music from Americana to rock and folk. I’ll also listen to Sirius/XM: Deep tracks, Little Steven’s underground as well as Willie’s Roadhouse and Outlaw country.
  • The Comedian I owned an assembled-in-Brazil ‘03 Golf GTI from new until ‘09 (traded in on a C30 R-Design).First few years were relatively trouble free, but the last few years are what drove me to buy a scan tool (back when they were expensive) and carry tools and spare parts at all times.Constant electrical problems (sensors & coil packs), ugly shedding “soft” plastic trim, glovebox door fell off, fuel filters oddly lasted only about a year at a time, one-then-the-other window detached from the lift mechanism and crashed inside the door, and the final reason I traded it was the transmission went south.20 years on? This thing should only be owned by someone with good shoes, lots of tools, a lift and a masochistic streak.
  • Terry I like the bigger size and hefty weight of the CX90 and I almost never use even the backseat. The average family is less than 4 people.The vehicle crash safety couldn't be better. The only complaints are the clumsy clutch transmission and the turbocharger.
  • MaintenanceCosts Plug in iPhone with 200 GB of music, choose the desired genre playlist, and hit shuffle.
  • MaintenanceCosts Golf with a good body and a dying engine. Somewhere out there there is a dubber who desperately wants to swap a junkyard VR6 into this and STANCE BRO it.
Next