Ford's BlueCruise Under Scrutiny After Fatal Crash
Tesla’s Autopilot and Full-Self Driving tech have been under scrutiny for a while now over their repeated failure to stop collisions and monitor driver behavior. Now, it’s Ford’s turn under the spotlight with its BlueCruise system. The NTSB said it wants to find out if the system was in use when a Mustang Mach-E was involved in a deadly crash in San Antonio, Texas.
The Mach-E ran into a Honda CR-V stopped in a travel lane on Interstate 10, killing its driver, a 56-year-old man. Ford said it reported the incident to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration as soon as it became aware of the crash and noted that it will cooperate fully with any investigation.
BlueCruise is advertised as a hands-free system, but it’s only Level 2 autonomy meaning the car can’t drive itself without an attentive human behind the wheel ready to take complete control at any time. The system works on limited-access highways, like Interstate 10, across North America, and owners pay a subscription fee for access to the feature.
This story comes shortly after the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety’s new research hit the streets, which found that many driver assistance functions, including BlueCruise, fail to adequately monitor driver behavior and give enough feedback when something goes wrong. A spokesperson for the IIHS said that while many drivers feel the features make their long drives easier, there’s very little evidence that they make the trip safer.
The IIHS rated BlueCruise Poor in the new tests, where it is joined by the Tesla Model 3, Mercedes-Benz C-Class, Genesis G90, and Volvo S90. Only the Lexus LS earned an Acceptable score in the updated tests.
[Image: Ford]
Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.
Chris grew up in, under, and around cars, but took the long way around to becoming an automotive writer. After a career in technology consulting and a trip through business school, Chris began writing about the automotive industry as a way to reconnect with his passion and get behind the wheel of a new car every week. He focuses on taking complex industry stories and making them digestible by any reader. Just don’t expect him to stay away from high-mileage Porsches.
More by Chris Teague
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- E I get that TTAC has a strong anti EV bias but this article is quite a reach. For GM and Ford to pressure their suppliers to cut costs is business as usual. It would be bigger news if they told suppliers not to worry about costs and to keep raising prices on parts.
- Master Baiter Consumers should have the right to purchase products from other countries if they are better or cheaper than domestic alternatives. However, retaining the capacity to manufacture goods is also in the national interest. I don't have the answer.
- Tom Frank …hit up a Ford or Lincoln dealer to have the vehicle software updated to the latest version…But isn’t the latest version the reason for the recall? I’d like last month’s software, please. That version worked.
- Pig_Iron Many, many moons ago in in my macro economics class, they preached to us from upon high that "free trade" is the only way to go. Period. End of discussion. So free trade spread across North America and deindustrialization swept the land. Employment in good paying jobs with saving wages, health benefits, and decent pensions evaporated in the rush to offshore. But not to worry they said, the "knowledge economy" would replace it. But the knowledge proved even easier to offshore. Don't worry they said we are now a "service economy". But those jobs turned out to be little more than wage slavery. But don't worry they said. there's actually a labor shortage, so we'll throw the borders wide open to undocumented fighting age male migrants and turn a blind eye to others exploited in the process. And on top of all that, China has declared "unrestricted warfare" on us. So, you ask me if protectionism is a valid strategy to combat a flood of products on a markedly tilted playing field? Three guesses, first two don't count. ✌
- THX1136 I don't view Chinese products as being all that much better. For me they are the new 'made in Japan' which, when I was a kid, was an indicator of poor quality, not exceptional as they became. Case in point, look at the cheap (meaning poorly made) items that make up over 60% (conservatively) of what's on the shelf at retailers such as Wally World. I would agree allowing them in without much todo would in theory push others to do better. I feel that is only sometimes the case. AND, it's an election year so there is tons o'posturing on both sides.
Comments
Join the conversation
For those that care to read the details of the crash NOT included in this article but published elsewhere- this happened at nearly 10pm when the CRV was stopped in the center lane of travel, lights off, with the driver remaining in the car. Not only is it not known if Blue Cruise was being used, it would have been a nightmare for most alert human drivers to mitigate that driving the 70+mph speed limit on many sections of I-10 in Texas, much less an AV system.
Tragic. Where in the name of all that is holy did anybody get the idea that self-driving cars were a good idea? I get the desire for lane-keeping, and use it myself, occasionally, but I don't even like to look across the car at my passenger while driving, let along relinquish complete control.